DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20191281

Role of digital photography in evaluation of gallbladder specimens following laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstone disease: a prospective observational study

Vidyasagar ., Manjunath Maruti Pol, Sunil Chumber, Yashwant Singh Rathor

Abstract


Background: Digital photography helps in accurate documentation of macroscopic features of specimens and preventing inaccuracies in description of macroscopic features. Some studies recommend a digital color print be sent with each specimen to histopathology laboratory. The aim of the study was to assess the necessity of histopathological examination of resected specimen of gallbladder with no features suspicious of carcinoma gall bladder on clinicoradiological study.

Methods: It is a prospective observational study conducted in the Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, between 2014 and 2016. Patients between 18 to 60 years of age with gall stone disease with no features suspicious of carcinoma gall bladder on clinicoradiological study were recruited in the study. Post-cholecystectomy gallbladder specimens were considered as subjects of study. Specimen were photographed and sent for histopathological examination. Macroscopic features on digital photography were compared with histopathological findings.

Results: About, 39/100 (39%) gallbladder specimens showed abnormal findings on digital photography; 30/39 (77%) had ulcerations, 5/39 (13%) had polypoidal lesions and 4/39 (10%) had diffuse wall thickening. 1/39 (2.6%) specimens with abnormal finding on digital photography was found to be malignant on histopathological examination. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of digital photography was 100%, 67.7%, 100% and 3.03% respectively.

Conclusions: Digital photography can prove to be a good tool in documenting macroscopic features of gallbladder specimens. Digital photography is associated with high sensitivity and negative predictive value; however, larger sample size is required to establish its significant correlation.


Keywords


Digital photography, Cholecystectomy, Carcinoma gall bladder

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lillemoe KD. Sleisenger and Fordtran's, Tumors of the gallbladder, bile ducts, and ampulla, Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Saunders; 2006: 1487–1502.

Duffy A, Capanu M, Abou-Alfa GK, Huitzil D, Jarnagin W, Fong Y, et al. Gallbladder Cancer (GBC): 10-year Experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC). J Surg Oncol. 2008;98(7):485-9

Leong FJ, Leong AS. Digital photography in anatomical pathology. J Postgrad Med. 2004;50:62-9.

Dix FP, Bruce IA, Krypcyzk A, Ravi S. A selective approach to histopathology of the Gallbladder Is Justifiable. Surgeon. 2003;1(4):233-5.

Bazoua G, Hamza N, Lazim T. Do We Need Histology for a Normal-looking Gallbladder? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2007;14(6):564-8.

Mittal R, Jesudason MR, Nayak S. Selective histopathology in cholecystectomy of gallstone disease. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2010;29(5):211.

Leong FJ, Leong AS. Digital imaging in pathology: theoretical and practical considerations, and applications. Pathology, 2004;36:234-41.

Cruz D, Seixas M. A surgical pathology system for gross specimen examination. Procedings of the AMIA Symposium. 1999: 236-240

Stromberg. Fundamental Principles of Descriptive Anatomic Pathology (How to Describe and Interpret What You See), in Charles Louis Davis Foundation for the Advancement of Veterinary and Comparative Pathology, 2007.

Gabril MY, Yousef GM. Informatics for practicing anatomical pathologists: marking a new era in pathology practice. Modern Pathology. 2010;23:349-58.

Parwani AV. Digital Imaging, in Pathology Informatics: Theory & Practice. Am Society Clin Pathol. 2012: 231-256.

Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N, Kitagawa Y, Katohno Y, Sasaya T, Takara D, et al. Unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005; 12:391–8.

Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, Sen B. Incidental carcinoma gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2041–6.

Kraas E, Frauenschuh D, Farke S. Intraoperative suspicion of gallbladder carcinoma in laparoscopic surgery: what to do? Dig Surg. 2002;19:489–93.

Samad A. Gallbladder carcinoma in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis. J Pak Med Assoc 2005;55:497–9.

Histopathology and cytopathology of limited or no clinical value. Report of working group of The Royal College of Pathologists, 2nd edition London: Royal College of Pathologists, 2005.

Darmas B. Is There Any Justification for the Routine Histological Examination of Straightforward Cholecystectomy Specimens? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(3):238–41.

Taylor HW. ‘Routine’ pathological examination of the gallbladder is a futile exercise. Br J Surg. 1998;85:208.

You DD. What is an adequate extent of resection for T1 gallbladder cancers? Ann Surg. 2008;247:835–8.

Lai CH. Gallbladder cancer - a comprehensive review. Surgeon. 2008;6:101–10.