Study on clinical profile and management of abdominal tumours in children

Authors

  • Varsha S. Kane Department of General Surgery, Ashwini Rural Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Kumbhari, Solapur, Maharashtra, India
  • Babu P. Ubale Department of General Surgery, Ashwini Rural Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Kumbhari, Solapur, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20190026

Keywords:

Abdominal mass, Children, Ultrasonography, Wilm’s tumour

Abstract

Background: The discovery of an abdominal mass in a child usually presents a challenging problem in the diagnosis and treatment to the paediatrician, surgeon and urologist. Because of the heterogenicity of the lesion knowledge of differential of a mass in abdomen is essential for the logical evaluation of a child.

Methods: The present study comprises of 25 children who presented with an intra-abdominal mass were included. The medical causes of the abdominal masses i.e. hepatosplenomegaly and leukemias were excluded. All patients admitted were routine investigated and whichever necessary. After the diagnosis, surgery was done wherever indicated and post-operatively the diagnosis was confirmed after the histopathological report.

Results: All the cases presented with mass in abdomen while the other presentations were pain in abdomen (36%), fever (20%) and haematuria and vomiting (16% each). It was found that 64% of the masses were urological in origin while 36% of the masses were non-urological in origin. 21 (84%) patients underwent surgery, 10 (40%) patients took chemotherapy, 9 (36%) patients took radiotherapy.

Conclusions: Routine investigations were only helpful in diagnosing the infection in infecting cases. Most reliable specific investigation was intravenous pyelography. It was found that majority of the abdominal masses in children were arising from urinary system. Correlation between pre-operative and post-operative diagnosis was found almost consistent.

References

Oldham KT, Colombani PM, Foglia RP, eds. Surgery of infants and children. Scientific Principles and Practice. Lippincott: Raven; 1997:537.

Young G, Toretsky JA, Campbell AB, Eskenazi AE. Recognition of common childhood malignancies. Am Family Physician. 2000;61(7):2144-54.

Kasper TE, Osborne Jr RW, Semerdjian HS, Miller HC. Urologic abdominal masses in infants and children. J Urol. 1976;116(5):629-33.

Vyas JJ, Deshpande RK, Sharma S, Desai PB. Multiple primary cancers in Indian population: metachronous and synchronous lesions. J Surg Oncol. 1983;23(4):239-49.

Emanuel B, White H. Intravenous pyelography in the deferential diagnosis of renal masses in the neonatal period. Clin Pediatr. 1968;7(9):529-38.

Wilson DA. Ultrasound screening for abdominal masses in the neonatal period. Am J Dis Children. 1982;136(2):147-51.

Labrosse EH. Biochemical diagnosis of neuroblastoma: use of a urine spot test. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research. Birmingham: Am Assoc Cancer Res. 1968;9:39.

Raffensperger JG. Eikenella corrodens infections in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1986 Jul 1;21(7):644-6.

Slim MS, Dabbous I, Frayha F, Issa P. Malignant abdominal neoplasms in childhood. Am J Surg. 1969;118(1):75-82.

Wedge JJ, Grosfeld JL, Smith JP. Abdominal masses in the newborn: 63 cases. J Urol. 1971;106(5):770-5.

Parrott TS, Woodard JR. Reflux in opposite ureter after successful correction of unilateral vesicoureteral reflux. Urol. 1976;7(3):276-8.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles