Anatomical and clinical evaluation of perforator-based flaps of lower limb

Mohit Jain; R. K. Basant; Shivam Madeshiya; D. Kumar; Vikas Dwivedi; Nandan Rai

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20185505

Authors

Mohit Jain Department of Surgery, MLN Medical College, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
R. K. Basant Department of Surgery, District hospital, Behraich, Uttar Pradesh, India
Shivam Madeshiya Department of Surgery, MLN Medical College, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
D. Kumar Department of Surgery, MLN Medical College, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Vikas Dwivedi Department of Surgery, MLN Medical College, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
Nandan Rai Department of Surgery, MLN Medical College, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20185505

Keywords:

Delayed healing, Flap reconstruction

Abstract

Background: Wound of lower leg have a poor and delayed healing due to paucity of blood supply. Coverage of defects of leg and foot has always posed a problem for reconstructive surgeon. The objective of this study was to evaluate anatomical basis of various perforator-based flaps in lower limb and their clinical outcome and usefulness.

Methods: All patients with post traumatic defects with exposed bones/tendons in the leg and ankle region presenting in MLN Medical college, Allahabad from August 2011 to July 2012 were included in the study.

Results: A total 12 patients were included in study. Majority of cases are of compound fracture following accidents involving lower one third of leg. Majority of flaps were based on peroneal artery (5) and posterior tibial artery (5), only 2 flaps were based on anterior tibial artery. Maximum flap length was 21cm and maximum flap rotation was 180º. Complications occurred more in cases having maximum rotation. Result were good in 11 patients and satisfactory in 1 patient with coverage of the defect leading to healing of the wound. More time gap between injury and flap reconstruction leads to more complications and longer hospital stay. Graft site complication occur in 5 cases include partial flap necrosis, infection and venous congestion. There was no complication at the donor site.

Conclusions: Perforator based flaps can be used for all large lower leg defects provided there is correct measurement and anatomical knowledge of various perforators, with good functional and cosmetic results.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Cannon Bi, Constable J.D, Furlaw L.T, Hayhurst J.W, McCarthy J.G. and McCraw J.B. Reconstructive surgery of the lower extremity. In: converse J.M. eds. Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, 2nd ed. Philadelphia; W.B: Saunders; 1977: 3521.

Stark, R.B. Plastic surgery. NY; Hoeber Medical Division: Harper and Row; 1962: 271.

Ponten B. The fasciocutaneous flap: its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Brit J Plastic Surg. 1981;34(2):215-20.

Wee JT. Reconstruction of the lower leg and foot with the reverse-pedicled anterior tibial flap: preliminary report of a new fasciocutaneous flap. J Plastic, Reconstructive Aesthetic Surg. 1986;39(3):327-37.

Amarante J, Costa H, Reis J, Soares R. A new distally based fasciocutaneous flap of the leg. Brit J Plastic Surg. 1986;39(3):338-40.

Carriquiry C, Aparecida MC, Vasconez LO. An anatomic study of the septocutaneous vessels of the leg. Plastic Reconstructive Surg. 1985;76(3):354-63.

Haertsch P. The surgical plane in the leg. Brit J Plastic Surg. 1981;34(4):464-9.

Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. A classification of fascio-cutaneous flaps according to their patterns of vascularisation. Brit J Plastic Surg. 1984;37(1):80-7.

Donski PK, Fogdestam I. Distally based fasciocutaneous flap from the sural region. Scandinavian J Plastic Reconstructive Surg. 1983;17(3):191-6.

D'arpa S, Cordova A, Pignatti M, Moschella F. Freestyle pedicled perforator flaps: safety, prevention of complications, and management based on 85 consecutive cases. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery. 2011;128(4):892-906.