Tumescent non-tumescent technique for split thickness skin graft harvesting

Authors

  • M. K. Rajendran Department of Plastic Surgery, Government Mohan Kumaramangalam Medical College Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20185038

Keywords:

Adrenaline, Healing rate of donor site, Plastic surgery fellow, Tumescent technique

Abstract

Background: Split-thickness skin graft failures can be attributed to flaws in the recipient bed which has to be well prepared. Tissues with limited blood supply such as bone, tendons, cartilage or sites with necrotic tissue or infection do not accept skin grafts. Adrenaline is used to harvest skin grafts due to its vasoconstriction effect which limits blood loss. The aim of our study was to determine skin graft take after tumescent technique compared to a non-tumescent technique for harvesting.

Methods: Two treatment groups of patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned. Forty patients underwent split-thickness skin graft harvesting with tumescent technique and forty patients underwent non-tumescent split-thickness skin graft harvesting. The recipient site was opened in both groups on the fifth day after surgery and take rate assessed. The donor site was assessed on day ten and if not healed, followed up for three weeks.

Results: There was a statistically significant association between skin graft take rate and skin grafting technique (p=0.011). The mean graft take rate was 2.5% higher in the tumescent group compared to the non-tumescent group (96.3% compared to 94%). On day 10, there was no difference in percentage healing of donor sites between the tumescent and non-tumescent groups, p=0.562.

Conclusions: Tumescent technique significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss. It is safe, inexpensive and easy to use. The subdermal adrenaline/saline injection creates a smooth, dense surface which assists debridement and donor harvesting.

References

Budny PG, Regan PJ, Roberts AH. The estimation of blood loss during burn surgery. Burns. 1993:19(20):134-7.

Steadman PB, Pegg SP. A quantitative assessment of blood loss in burn wound excision and grafting. Burns. 1992:18(6):490-1.

Moran KT, O'Reilly TJ, Furman W, Munster AM. A new algorithm for calculation of blood loss in excisional burn surgery. Am Surg. 1988;54(4):207-8.

Housinger TA, Lang D, Warden GD. A prospective study of blood loss with excisional therapy in pediatric burn patients. J Trauma. 1993;34(2):262-3.

Abbott AM, Miller BT, Tuttle TM. Outcomes after tumescent technique versus electrocautery mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8):2607-11.

Rosenberg JL, Zawacki BE. Reduction of blood loss using tourniquets and compression dressings in excising limb burns. J Trauma. 1986;26(1):47-50.

Marano MA, O'Sullivan G, Madden M, Finkelstein J, Goodwin CW. Tourniquet technique for reduced blood loss and wound assessment during excision of burn wounds of the extremity. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;171(3):249-50.

Snelling CF, Shaw K. The effect of topical epinephrine hydrochloride in saline on blood loss following tangential excision of the burn wound. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(6):830-6.

Barret JP, Dziewulski P, Wolf SE, Desai MH, Nichols RJ 2nd, Herndon DN. Effect of topical and subcutaneous epinephrine in combination with topical thrombin in blood loss during immediate near total burn wound excision In pediatric burn patients. Burns. 1999;25(6):509-13.

Brezel BS, McGeever KE, Stein JM. Epinephrine versus thrombin for split-thickness donor site hemostasis. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1987;8(2):132-4.

Ofodile FA, Sadana MK. The role of topical thrombin in skin grafting. J Natl Med Assoc. 1991:83(5):416-8.

Gomez M, Logsetty S, Fish JS. Reduced blood loss during burn surgery. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2001:22(2):111-7.

Janezic T, Prezelj B, Brcić A, Arnez Z, Zaletelj-Kragelj L. Intraoperative blood loss after tangential excision of burn wounds treated by subeschar infiltration of epinephrine. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1997;31(3):245-50.

Sheridan RL, Szyfelbein SK. Staged high dose epinephrine clysis is safe and effective in extensive tangential burn excisions in children. Burns. 1999:25(8):745-8.

Robertson RD, Bond P, Wallace B, Shewmake K, Cone J. The tumescent technique to significantly reduce blood loss during burn surgery. Burns. 2001:27(8):835-8.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles