DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20184628

Evaluation of combined use of modified Alvarado score and Ultrasound in predicting acute appendicitis: a prospective study

Nirajan Kansakar, P. N. Agarwal, Rajdeep Singh, Anurag Mishra, Jyoti Kumar, N. S. Hadke, Srushti Sheth

Abstract


Background: Appendicitis is notorious in its ability to simulate other conditions and accurate diagnosis is imperative for preventing complications of appendicitis on one hand and avoiding negative appendectomy on other. Despite extraordinary advances in modern radiography imaging and diagnostic laboratory investigations, the accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains an enigmatic challenge.

Methods: We evaluated 32 patients with features suggestive of acute appendicitis between September 2013 to March 2015. It was a cross-sectional observational study that included modified Alvarado score (MAS) and ultrasound (USG) in predicting appendicitis and correlated both these individually as well as combined, with histopathological findings. Statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test with Yates correction, Fischer’s exact test and unpaired Students’ t test.

Results: Ultrasound was found to be more sensitive (74.19%) and accurate (75.0%) as compared to MAS (41.94% and 43.75% respectively). The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) were similar in both the parameters (100% each). Also, when both the MAS and Ultrasound were combined in predicting acute appendicitis, the sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy increased to 80.64%, 14.29% and 81.25% respectively with specificity and PPV being the same as when MAS and USG were considered individually.

Conclusions: It is advised that both modified Alvarado score and ultrasound whenever available should be used to predict acute appendicitis to increase the number of positive cases and reduce negative appendectomy and hence reduce the morbidity and mortality.


Keywords


Appendicitis, Appendectomy, Modified Alvarado score, Ultrasound

Full Text:

PDF

References


Stephens PL, Mazzucco JJ. Comparison of ultrasound and the Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conn Med. 1999;63:137-40.

Fitz RH. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix with special reference to it’s early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med Sci. 1886;92:321-46.

Jaffe BM, Berger DH. The Appendix. In: Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Pollock RE. Schwartz's Principle of Surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005:1119-38.

Chan I, Bicknell SG, Graham M. Utility and diagnostic accuracy of sonography in detecting appendicitis in a community hospital. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1809-12.

Flum DR, McClure TD, Morris A, Koepsell T. Misdiagnosis of appendicitis and the use of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:933.

Olsen JB, Myren CJ, Haahr PE. Randomized study of the value of laparoscopy before appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1993;80:922-3.

Teicher I, Landa B, Cohen M, Cabnick LS, Wise L. Scoring system to aid in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Ann Surg. 1983;198:753-9.

Kalan M, Rich AJ, Talbot D, Cunliffe WJ. Evaluation of the modified Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994;76:418-9.

Alvarado A. A practical score for early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15:557-64.

Horzic M, Salamon A, Koplijar M. Analysis of scores in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women. Coll Antropol. 2005;11:4.

Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg. 2002;137:799-804.

Balthazar EJ. Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CT. Radiol. 1991;180:21-4.

Rao PM, Boland GWL. Imaging of acute right lower abdominal quadrant pain. Clin Radiol. 1998;53:639-49.

Horzic M, Salamon A, Koplijar M. Analysis of scores in diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women. Coll Antropol. 2005;29:133-8.

Nautiyal H, Ahmad S, Keshwani NK, Awasthi DN. Combined use of modified Alvarado score and USG in decreasing negative appendicectomy rate. Indian J Surg. 2010;72:42-8.

Preeyacha P, Ying J, Linam LE, Brody AS, Babcock DS. Sonography in the evaluation of acute appendicitis: are negative sonographic findings good enough?. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1749-55.

Rodriguez DP, Vargas S, Callahan MJ, Zurakowski D, Taylor GA. Appendicitis in young children: imaging experience and clinical outcomes. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1158-64.

Macklin CP, Radcliffe GS, Merei JM, Stringer MD. A prospective evaluation of the modified Alvarado score for acute appendicitis in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997;79:203-5.

Old JL, Dusing RW, Yap W, Dirks J. Imaging for suspected appendicitis. Am Fam Physician. 2005;71:71-8.

Taylor GA. Suspected appendicitis in children: in search of the single best diagnostic test. Radiol. 2004;231:293-5.

Jess P, Bjerregaard B, Brynitz, S, Christensen HJ, Kalaja E, Kristenssen LJ. Acute appendicitis prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications. Am J Surg. 1981;141:232-4.

Dunn EL, Moore EE, Elderling SC, Murphy JR. The unnecessary laparotomy for appendicitis: can it be decreased? Am Surg. 1982;48:320-3.

Chang FC, Hogle HH, Welling DA. The fate of the negative appendix. Am J Surg. 1974;126:752-4.

Nasiri S, Mohebbi F, Sodagari N, Hedayat A. Diagnostic values of ultrasound and the modified Alvarado scoring system in acute appendicitis. Int J Emerg Med. 2012;5:26.

Singh K, Gupta S, Pargal P. Application of Alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. JK Sci. 2008;10:84-6.

Gallego MG, Fadrique B, Nieto MA. Evaluation of ultrasonography and clinical diagnostic scoring in suspected appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1998;85:37-40.

Kurane SB, Sangolli MS, Gogate SA. A one-year prospective study to compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis, in adults. Indian J Surg. 2008;70:125-9.