Evaluation of possum scoring system in patients undergoing laparotomy

Authors

  • Manoharan G. V. Department of General Surgery, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Vijayalakshmi G. Department of General Surgery, ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, KK Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20190394

Keywords:

Morbidity, Mortality, Outcome predictors, POSSUM, Scoring system

Abstract

Background: Prediction of complications is an essential part of risk management in surgery. Knowing which patient is at risk of developing complications contributes to the quality of surgical care and cost reduction in surgery. Among the variety of scoring systems used to identify the “high risk” patient POSSUM scoring is the most widely used.

Methods: Patients undergoing laparotomy were selected serially and their physiological severity score on admission and operative severity scored at the end of 30days and compared with the POSSUM predicted score.

Results: In the elective surgery group, patients with morbidity correlated with high POSSUM scores but due to low overall morbidity conclusions could not be drawn while in the emergency group predicted morbidity correlated well with observed results. The low overall mortality in the study group precluded meaningful analysis.

Conclusions: POSSUM scoring system has an undeniable advantage in this set up for better patient counseling, improving the surgical outcomes in both emergency and elective wards and for better management of limited resources and manpower.

References

Bosscha K, Reijnders K, Hulstaert PF, Algra A, Van der Werken C. Prognostic scoring systems to predict outcome in peritonitis and intra‐abdominal sepsis. Brit J Surg. 1997;84(11):1532-4.

Prytherch DR, Sutton GL, Boyle JR. Portsmouth POSSUM models for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Brit J Surg. 2001;88(7):958-63.

Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters MP. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Brit J Surg. 1991;78(3):355-60.

Copeland GP. The POSSUM system of surgical audit. Arch Surg. 2002;137(1):15-9.

Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters MP. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Brit J Surg. 1991;78(3):355-60.

Afridi SP, Malik F, Ur-Rahman S, Shamim S, Samo KA. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis in Pakistan: 300 cases Eastern experience. World J Emerg Surg. 2008;3(1):31.

Kitara DL, Kakande I, Mugisa BD. POSSUM scoring system in patients undergoing laparotomy in Mulago Hospital. East Central African J Surg. 2007;12(2):133-42.

Jhobta RS, Attri AK, Kaushik R, Sharma R, Jhobta A. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis in India-review of 504 consecutive cases. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1(1):26.

Ramachandra ML, Jagadesh B, Chandra SB. Clinical study and management of secondary peritonitis due to perforated hollow viscous. Arch Med Sci. 2007;3(1):61-8.

Malangoni MA, Inui T. Peritonitis-the western experience. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1(1):25.

Dorairajan LN, Gupta S, Deo SV, Chumber S, Sharma LK. Peritonitis in India--a decade's experience. Trop Gastroenterol: Official J Digestive Dis Foundation. 1995;16(1):33-8.

Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM, Senapati A, Poloniecki JD, Stamatakis JD, et al. Development of a dedicated risk‐adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Brit J Surg. 2004;91(9):1174-82.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles