DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20191877

A comparative study of outcome of pyeloplasty in stented and non-stented children

Ashok Kumar Laddha, Eeshansh Khare, Brijesh Kumar Lahoti

Abstract


Background: It is a matter of debate whether to use a stent (double J) or not during pyeloplasty in patients of pelvic ureteric junction obstruction (PUJ obstruction). This study was conducted to assess which technique- stented or non-stented is better for paediatric patients with PUJ obstruction.

Methods: 45 paediatric patients aged 0-12 years were included in this prospective comparative simple randomized sample study during the period of June 2015 to August 2017 in paediatric surgery division of department of surgery in M.Y. Hospital, Indore. All patients except one underwent open A-H dismembered pyeloplasty. The parameters used for comparison were renal parenchymal diameter, renal pelvis AP diameter, GFR (by DTPA scan) and rate of complications. Minimum follow up period was 3 months.

Results: The M:F ratio was 2:1. Stented children had significant improvement in renal parenchymal diameter (i.e. increase) and GFR (of affected kidney) after pyeloplasty, whereas non-stented children too had improvement in renal parenchymal diameter and GFR (affected kidney) but was not significant. The percentage of postoperative complications were more in non-stented group as compared to stented group.

Conclusions: In all paediatric cases with PUJO undergoing A-H pyeloplasty, both stenting and non-stenting have similar results and to place a double J stent should depend on choice of surgeon.


Keywords


PUJO, A-H pyeloplasty, Double J stent, Renal parenchymal diameter, Renal pelvis AP diameter, GFR

Full Text:

PDF

References


Park JM, Bloom DA. The pathophysiology of UPJ obstruction. Current concepts. Urol Clin North Am. 1998;25(2):161-9.

Platt JF. Urinary obstruction. Radiol Clin North Am. 1996;34(6):1113-29.

Woo HH, Farnsworth RH. Dismembered pyeloplasty in infants under the age of 12 months. Br J Urol. 1996;77:449–51.

Baniel J, Livne PM, Savir A, Gillon G, Servadio C. Dismembered pyeloplasty in children with and without stents. Eur Urol. 1996;30:400–2.

Liss ZJ, Olsen TM, Roelof BA, Steinhardt GF. Duration of urinary leakageafter open non-stented dismembered pyeloplasty in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:613–6.

Hendren WH, Radhakrishnan J, Middleton AW Jr. Pediatric pyleoplasty. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15:133–44.

Homsy Y, Simard J, Debs C, Laberge I, Perreault G. Pyeloplasty: to divert or not to divert? Urology. 1980;16:577–83.

Wollin M, Duffy PG, Diamond DA, Aguirre J, Ratta BS, Ransley PG. Priorities in urinary diversion following pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1989;142:576–8.

Guys JM, Borella F, Monfort G. Ureteropelvic junction obstructions: prenatal diagnosis and neonatal surgery in 47 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 1988;23:156–8.

Ahmed S, Crankson S. Non-intubated pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 1997;12:389–92.

Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed preoperativelyand treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol. 1949;21:209–14.

Hussain S, Frank JD. Complications and length of hospital stay following stented and unstented paediatric pyeloplasties. Br J Urol. 1994;73:87–9.

Arda IS, Oguzkurt P, Sevmis S. Transanastomotic stents for dismemberedpyeloplasty in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002;18:115–8.

Sutherland RW, Chung SK, Roth DR, Gonzales ET. Pediatric pyeloplasty:outcome analysis based on patient age and surgical technique. Urology. 1997;50:963–6.

Persky L, Tynberg P. Unsplinted, unstinted, pyeloplasty. Urology. 1973;1:32–5.

Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Farhat WA, Bägli DJ, Khoury AE, PippiSalle JL. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties. J Urol. 2008;180:1693–8.

Zaidi Z, Mouriquand PD. The use of a multipurpose stent in children. Br J Urol. 1997;80:802–5.

Elmalik K, Chowdhury MM, Capps SN. Ureteric stents in pyeloplasty: a help or a hindrance? J Pediatr Urol. 2008;4:275–9.

McMullin N, Khor T, King P. Internal ureteric stenting following pyeloplasty reduces length of hospital stay in children. Br J Urol. 1993;72:370–2.

Ninan GK, Sinha C, Patel R, Marri R. Dismembered pyeloplasty using double ‘J’ stent in infants and children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25:191–4.

Smith KE, Holmes N, Lieb JI, Mandell J, Baskin LS, Kogan BA, et al. Stented versus nonstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a modern series and review of the literature. J Urol. 2002;168:1127–30.

Sibley GN, Graham MD, Smith ML, Doyle PT. Improving splintage techniques in pyeloplasty. Br J Urol. 1987;60:489–91.

Özdemir T, Arikan A. One day hospitalization after open, double-J stented pyeloplasty. World J Pediatr. 2010;6:271–3.

Nguyen DH, Aliabadi H, Ercole CJ, Gonzalez R. Nonintubated Anderson–Hynes repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 60 patients. J Urol. 1989;142:704–6.

Bayne AP, Lee KA, Nelson ED, Cisek LJ, Gonzales ET Jr, Roth DR. The impact of surgical approach and urinary diversion on patient outcomes in pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2011;186:1693–8.

Sarin YK, Gupta R, Nagdeve N. Pediatric pyeloplasty: intubated vs nonintubated. Indian J Urol. 2006;22:35–8.

Meisheri IV, Kamat TA, Maheshwari M. Pelveureteric junction obstruction stented versus unstented pyeloplasty. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2004;9:184–8.

Paick SH, Park HK, Oh SJ, Kim HH. Characteristics of bacterial colonization and urinary tract infection after indwelling of double-J ureteral stent. Urology 2003; 62:214–21 7.

Ben-Meir D, Golan S, Ehrlich Y, Livne PM. Characteristics and clinical significance of bacterial colonization of ureteral double-J stents in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2009;5:355–8.

Babu R, Sai V. Pelvis/cortex ratio: an early marker of success following pyeloplasty in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6:473–6.

Lee YS, Lee CN, Kim MU, Jang WS, Lee H, Im YJ, et al. The risk factors and clinical significance of acute postoperative complications after unstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a single surgeon’s experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(7):1166-70.

Romao RL, Farhat WA, Pippi Salle JL, Braga LH, Figueroa V, Bägli DJ, et al. Early postoperative ultrasound after open pyeloplasty in children withprenatal hydronephrosis helps identify low risk of recurrent obstruction. J Urol. 2012;188:2347–3.

Neste MG, du Cret RP, Finlay DE, Sane S, Gonzalez R, Boudreau RJ, et al. Postoperative diuresis renography and ultrasound in patients undergoing pyeloplasty. Predictors of surgical outcome. Clin Nucl Med. 1993;18:872–6.

Amling CL, O’Hara SM, Wiener JS, Schaeffer CS, King LR. Renal ultrasound changes after pyeloplasty in children with ureteropelvicjunction obstruction: long-term outcome in 47 renal units. J Urol. 1996;156:2020–4.

Pohl HG, Rushton HG, Park JS, Belman AB, Majd M. Early dieresis renogram findings predict success following pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2001;165:2311–5.

Psooy K, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Long-term follow up of pediatric dismembered pyeloplasty: how long is long enough? J Urol. 2003;169:1809–12.

Siddique M, Pansota MS, Saleem MS, Attique-ur-Rehman. Outcome of pyeloplasty in children. Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26(1):71-5.