DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20183730

Peritoneal closure or non-closure in open appendectomy: a reality or a myth

T. R. V. Wilkinson, Mahendra K. Chauhan, Isha Trivedi

Abstract


Background: The objective of this study is to analyze the difference of outcome and complications in peritoneal closure versus non-closure in open appendicectomy.

Methods: This was the prospective comparative study. 126 patients with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis undergoing open appendicectomy divided in two groups non-randomly. Group A: Open appendicectomy with closure of peritoneum (n=59) and Group B: Open appendicectomy with non-closure of peritoneum (n=67). Intra operative time and post-operative period for pain and complications like wound infections, hernia and duration of hospital stay were analyzed. Patients were shown ‘visual analogue scale’ on a daily basis and those who reported unbearable pain given additional analgesia.

Results: Operative time, number of doses of analgesic required, wound infections and duration of hospital stay in both groups were compared. Difference in operative time between both the groups was found to be statistically significant (p< 0.0001).

Conclusions: Non-closure of peritoneum in open appendicectomy is associated with lesser operative time, and shorter duration of hospital stay. Hence, it can be safely recommended.


Keywords


Appendicectomy, Operative time, Peritoneal closure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Farooq MS, Ayyaz MA, Khan WH. Non-closure of peritoneum leads to reduced used of analgesics and less post-operative pain as compared to the closure of peritoneum in appendectomy. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2013;7(2):506-9.

Anderson REB. Metanalysis of clinical and laboratory diagnosis of appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2004;91:28-37.

Julie A, Walter E, Frank E. Risk factors for adverse outcome after surgical treatment of appendicitis in adults. Ann Surg. 2003;238:59-66.

Pal K, Khan A. Appendicitis a continuing challenge. Pak Med Assoc. 1998;48:189-92.

Jehangir SK, Hassan H, Khan JA. Investigations for acute appendicitis: can we rely on them. Pak J Surg. 2002;18:27-30.

Kadanali S, Erten O, Kücüközkan T. Pelvic and periaortic pertioneal closure or non-closure at lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer: effects on morbidity and adhesion formation. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1996;22:282-5.

Doherty GM, Boey JH. Peritoneal cavity. In: Way LW, Doherty GM, eds. Current surgical diagnosis and treatment. 11th ed. USA: McGraw Hill; 2002:517-532.

Weerawetat W, Buranawanich S, Kanawong M. Closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at caesarean delivery: 16 years study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004;87:1007.

Cheong Y, Bajekal N, Li T. Peritoneal closure- to close or not to close. Human Reprod. 2001;16:1548-52.

Williams DC. The peritoneum, A plea for change in attitude towards this membrane. Br J Surg. 1955;42:401-5.

Waters WB, Buck RC, Scanning electron microscopy of mesothelial regeneration in the rat. Lab Invest 1972; 26: 604-9.

Irion O, Frank L, Beguin F. Non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial. B J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103;690-4.

Galindo Gallego M, Fadrique B, Nieto MA, Calleja S, Fernández‐Aceñero MJ, Ais G, et al. Evaluation of ultrasonography and clinical diagnostic scoring in suspected appendicitis. British J Surg. 1998 Jan 1;85(1):37-40.

Martin LC, Puente I. Open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy: a prospective randomized comparision. Ann Surg. 1995;222(3):256-62.

Pietrantoni M, Parsons MJ, O’Brien WG, Collins F, Knuppel RA, Spellacy WN. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at caesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:293-6.

Hull DB, Varner MW. A randomized study of closure of the peritoneum at caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:818-20.

Nagele F, Karas H, Spitzer D, Standach A, Kurasegh S, Beck A, et al. Closure or non-closure of the visceral peritoneum at caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996:714:1366-70.

Grundsell HS, Diaa EFR, Kumar RM. Randomized study of non-closure of peritoneum in lower segment caesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77;90:110-5.

Rafique Z, Shibli KU, Russel IF, Lindow Sw. A randomized controlled trial of the closure or non- closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: effect on post operative pain. BJOG. 2002;109:694-8.

Demirel Y, Gursoy S, Duran B, Erden O, Cetin M, Balta O, et al. Closure or non-closure of the peritoneum at gynaecological operations. Effect on post-operative pain. Saudi Med J. 2005;26:964-8.

CORONIS Trial collaborative group. The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical technique : a randomised fractional, factorial trail. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2007;7:24.

Hojberg KE, Aagaard J, Laursen H, Diab L, Secher NL. Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:741-5.

Ellis H, Heddle R. Does the peritoneum needs to be closed at laparotomy? Br J Surg. 1977 Oct;64(10):733-6.

Dorfman S, Rincon A, Shortt H. Cholecystectomy via kocher incision without peritoneal closure. Invest Clin. 1997:38(1):3-7.