Comparison of early postoperative outcome of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia mesh repair

Authors

  • Pulkit Garg Department of Surgery, Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Sreekar Agumbe Pai Department of Surgery, Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Hosamath Vijaykumar Department of Surgery, Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20183007

Keywords:

Inguinal hernia, Laparoscopic hernioplasty, Open hernioplasty

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic hernia has all the benefits of a tension free repair. The aim of this study was to compare the early postoperative outcome of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia mesh repair.

Methods: This is a prospective study conducted at Ramaiah hospital Bangalore from June 2016 to July 2017. 70 cases of inguinal were included in the study hernia diagnosed clinically and radiologically who fulfilled the inclusion & the exclusion criteria. The principal operative techniques were laparoscopic hernioplasty (LH) and open inguinal mesh hernioplasty (OH).

Results: 35 patients each were allotted to two group (LH and OH). The mean age was 50.53. LH group had significantly less postoperative pain than the OH group on 12, 24 and 72 hrs (P <0.05). Although the vas pain scores of LH group were also comparatively lower on postoperative day 14, these differences were not statistically significant. Than mean operative time was significantly higher for LH group (131.86 vs 80.29 min) although in bilateral cases the difference was considerably less but was still significant (138 vs 107 min). The mean hospital stay after surgery was less for LH group (2.68 vs 3.25 days) but was not statistically significant. (p = 0.073). Chronic pain persisted for 2 patients (5.7%) in OH group whereas none had chronic pain in LH group.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic hernioplasty is equivalent to open repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia, with less post-operative pain, lower risk of wound infection, shorter duration of hospital stay, and less incidence of chronic pain however requires a long learning curve and is more expensive.

References

Malangoni MA, Gagliani RJ. Hernias. In: Townsend CM Jr, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, editors. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice. 19th Ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier;2012:1114-1140.

Sherman V, Macho JR, Brunicardi FC. Inguinal Hernias, Schwartz's Principles of Surgery, 10th Ed. McGraw-Hill Education/Medical; 2015:1495-1518.

Mirza AA, Augustine AJ, Shibumon M. Surgical Outcomes Open versus Laparoscopic Repair for Inguinal Hernia. IOSR-JDMS. 2014;13(4):46-9.

Anadol ZA, Ersoy E, Taneri F, Taken E. Outcome and cost comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair versus open Lichtenstein hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2004;14:159-63.

Pahwa HS, Kumar A, Agarwal P, Agarwal AA. Current trends in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: A review. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(9):789-92.

Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanagh DO, Hurley M. Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):3059-64.

Shah NR, Mikami DJ, Cook C, Manilchuk A, Hodges C, Memark VR et al. A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul 1;25(7):2330-7.

Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanagh DO, Hurley M. Laparoscopic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of quality-of-life outcomes. World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):3059-64.

Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: Risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006;367:1618-25.

Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs. Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(2):188-99.

McCormack K, Scott N, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant A. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD001785.

Scheuermann U, Niebisch S, Lyros O, Jansen-Winkeln B, Gockel I. Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surg. 2017;10(17):55.

Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13:343-403.

Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, et al. Update with level 1 studies of the European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2014;18:151-63.

Jain SK, Gupta A. Laparoscopic vs. open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review of literature. Asian J Med Sci. 2014;5(3).

Bowling K, El-Badawy S, Massri E, Rait J, Atkinson J, Leong S et al. Laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: Patient reported outcomes in the elderly from a single centre-A prospective cohort study. Annal Med Surg. 2017 Oct;22:12-5.

Sudarshan PB, Sundaravadanan BS, Kaarthik VP. Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of unilateral inguinal hernia: a comparative study. Int Surg J. 2017 Mar;4(3):921-5.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles