DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20182930

Delayed complications after open inguinal hernia repair: a comparison of two techniques

Vashisht Dikshit, Digvijay Jadhav, Iqbal Ali, Pratham Mody, Neha Srivastava

Abstract


Background: The open preperitoneal repair offers the benefits of placing the mesh in the preferred position while avoiding the disadvantages of laparoscopic repair.

Methods: A total of 60 patients with bilateral inguinal hernias were randomized to undergo either the standard Lichtenstein meshplasty or the modified iliopubic tract repair in a teaching hospital. Outcomes measured were chronic inguinal pain, groin numbness, and recurrence.

Results: Delayed complications like chronic inguinal pain and numbness were not seen in the iliopubic tract group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). One patient in the Lichtenstein repair group had recurrence of hernia. There were no recurrences in the iliopubic tract repair group. This difference again, was not statistically significant (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The iliopubic tract repair offers an excellent alternative to the Lichtenstein meshplasty, and is associated with lower incidence of delayed neurological complications, recurrence rates on par with the gold standard Lichtenstein meshplasty.


Keywords


Chronic pain, Hernia, Hernioplasty, Mesh, Recurrence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Paajanen H, Varjo R. Ten-year audit of Lichtenstein hernioplasty under local anaesthesia performed by surgical residents. BMC Surg. 2010;10:24.

Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Keemers-Gels M, Rosman C, Strobbe L. Pain after open preperitoneal repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2007 Sep;31(9):1751-7.

Beets GL, Oosterhuis KJ, Go PM, Baeten CG, Kootstra G. Longterm followup (12–15 years) of a randomized controlled trial comparing Bassini-Stetten, Shouldice, and high ligation with narrowing of the internal ring for primary inguinal hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:352-7.

Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, Poucher J, Hennet H, Habib E, et al. Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicenter controlled trial in 1578 patients. Annals Surg. 1995 Dec;222(6):719.

Kingsnorth AN, Gray MR, Nott DM. Prospective randomized trial comparing the Shouldice technique and plication darn for inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1068-70.

Nilsson E, Kald A, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Fordell R, Haapaniemi S, et al. Hernia surgery in a defined population: A prospective three-year audit. Eur J Surg. 1997;163:823-9.

Willaert W, De Bacquer D, Rogiers X, Troisi R, Berrevoet F. Open preperitoneal techniques versus lichtenstein repair for elective inguinal hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 2011;7: CD008034.

Sajid MS, Craciunas L, Singh KK, Sains P, Baig MK. Open transinguinal preperitoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a targeted systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2013 Sep;1(2):127-37.

Ray R, Kar M, Mukhopadhyay M. Transinguinal preperitoneal technique of inguinal hernioplasty - a better alternative to lichtenstein procedure. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 May;8(5):NC01-3.

Koning GG, Keus F, Koeslag L, Cheung CL, Avçi M, van Laarhoven CJ, et al. Randomized clinical trial of chronic pain after the transinguinal preperitoneal technique compared with Lichtenstein's method for inguinal hernia repair. British J Surg. 2012;99(10):1365-73.

Liu Z, Sun M, Zhang L, Wu W, Wang W, Li X, et al. Comparison of open preperitoneal repair and Lichtenstein herniorraphy on the surgical treatment of inguinal hernia. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;52(9):682-5.

Koning GG, Wetterslev J, van Laarhoven CJHM, Keus F. The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein's technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized clinical trials. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(1): e52599.

Johansson B, Hallerbäck B, Glise H, Anesten B, Smedberg S, Román J. Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair. Annals Surg. 1999;230(2):225.

Devlin HB, Russell IT, Muller D, Sahay AK, Tiwari PN. Short-stay surgery for inguinal hernia. Clinical outcome of the Shouldice operation. Lancet 1977;1(8016): 847-9.

Amato B, Moja L, Panico S, Persico G, Rispoli C, Rocco N, et al. Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2012; 4: CD001543.

Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H. Groin hernia repair in young males: mesh or sutured repair? Hernia. 2010; 14(5): 467-9.

Lichtenstein IL, Schulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM et al. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am. J. Surg. 1989;157;188-93.

Sanjay P, Watt DG, Ogston SA, Alijani A, Windsor JA. Meta-analysis of Prolene Hernia System mesh versus Lichtenstein mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Surg. 2012; 10(5): 283-9.

McCormack K, Scott N, Go P, Ross S, Grant A, Trialists CtEH. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2008; (4).