DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20183212

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study of 120 cases

Jenish Yogeshkumar Sheth, Foram Arvindbhai Modh

Abstract


Background: Inguinal hernias have been treated traditionally with open methods of hernioplasty. But the trends have changed in last 2 decades with the introduction of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and total extra preperitoneal (TEP) surgery.

Methods: The study was prospective type conducted from January 2010 to April 2018. 130 patients, who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. 60 patients for TAPP and 60 patients for TEP. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative and follow up data was analysed.

Results: From 130 patients,10 patient underwent open hernia repair due to anaesthetics reason. 93.3% primary hernias and 6.7% recurrent hernias. 50% was repaired by TEP and 50% by TAPP. Mean time taken for surgeries was 60-90 min. The intraoperative, postoperative complications rates were 1.2% and 7.4% respectively. Mean hospital stay was 1-5 days.

Conclusions: laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair could be contemplated safely both via totally extra peritoneal as well as transperitoneal route even in our setup of developing country with modifications.


Keywords


Hernioplasty, Inguinal hernia, Transabdominal preperitoneal, Total extra preperitoneal surgery

Full Text:

PDF

References


McCormack K, Wake BL, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(14):1-203.

Schultz LS, Graber JN, Pietrafitta JJ, Hickock DF. Early results with laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy are promising. Clin Laser Mon. 1990;8(7):103-5.

Ger R. Laparoscopic hernia operation (in German). Chirurg. 1991;62(4):266-70.

Misra MC, Bansal VK, Kumar S, Prashant B, Bhattacharjee HK. Total extra-peritoneal repair of groin hernia: prospective evaluation at a tertiary care center. Hernia. 2008;12(1):65-71.

Filipi CJ, Gaston-Johansson F, McBride PJ, Murayama K, Gerhardt J,

Palanivelu C. Laparoscopic trans abdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty. Chapter 70. 1st ed;1137, 1140, 1154.

Grant AM. Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data. Hernia. 2002;6(1):2-10.

McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S Grant AM. EU hernia trialists collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD001785.

Fitzgibbons Jr RJ, Camps J, Cornet DA, Nguyen NX, Litke BS, Annibali R, Salerno GM. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 1995;221(1):3-13.

ACS Surgery principles & practice hernia repair chapter 28/ part 1 / types of inguinal hernia repair.

Fitzgibbons RJ, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs JO, Dunlop DD, Reda DJ, McCarthy M, et al. Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;295(3):285-92.

McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM; EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD001785.

Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P, Kunelius P, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(3):518-22.

Butters M, Redecke J, Koninger J. Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. Br J Surg. 2007;94(5):562-5.

Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(2):188-99.

Eker HH, Langeveld HR, Klitsie PJ, van't Riet M, Stassen LP, Weidema WF. Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Surg. 2012;147(3):256-60.