DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20183209

Outcome of surgeries for non-traumatic hollow viscous perforations

Hota P. K., Mahesh S. V., Reddy Dilip Kumar

Abstract


Background: Patients with non-traumatic hollow viscous perforations present challenge to the surgeons and outcome depends upon location and surgeon skills. Present study was to investigate the outcome of surgeries for non-traumatic hollow viscous perforations.

Methods: This is a prospective observational study carried out in surgical wards in Mamata General Hospital between October 2015 and September 2017 over a period of 02 years. Evaluation of all the patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria with respect to history, physical findings, operative findings and postoperative complications in line with the predetermined objectives was done. Various treatment modalities available and their outcome were also evaluated.

Results: Benign causes of gastrointestinal perforation constituted majority of non-traumatic gastrointestinal perforations. Peptic ulcer perforation (68%) was the major cause of gastrointestinal perforation. Most common site for non-traumatic gastrointestinal perforations was duodenum (48%). Simple closure with omental patch was the operative procedure done for all cases of peptic ulcer perforation and appendicectomy for appendicular perforation. Ileal perforations secondary to typhoid perforation were treated with resection and end-to-end anastomoses in the present study. Colonic perforation was managed with Hartmann’s procedure. Most common complication was SSI (34%). Mortality was 8% and was due to septicemia.

Conclusions: Aggressive resuscitation and early meticulous surgery is required to decrease morbidity and mortality in hollow viscous perforation cases.

 


Keywords


Hollow viscous perforations, Non-traumatic, Outcome, Surgeries

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lau WY, Leow CK. History of perforated duodenal and gastric ulcers. World J Surg. 1997;21:890-6.

Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Perforated peptic ulcer disease: A review of history and treatment. Dig Surg. 2010;27:161-9.

Prabhu V, Shivani A. An overview of history, pathogenesis and treatment of perforated peptic ulcer disease with evaluation of prognostic scoring in adults. Annals Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(1):22-9.

Watts G. Nobel prize is awarded to doctors who discovered H. pylori. BMJ. 2005;331:795.

Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht IV/florence consensus report. Gut. 2012;61:646-64.

Loria FL. Historical aspects of penetrating wounds of the abdomen. Int Abstr Surg. 1948;89:521.

Bhogal RH, Athwal R, Durkin D, Deakin M, Cheruvu CN. Comparison between open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease. World J Surg. 2008;32:2371-4.

Pal DK. Evaluation of best surgical procedures in typhoid perforation: an experience of 60 cases. Trop Doc. 1998;28(1):16-8.

Singh BU, Dinesh J, Jagdish S et al. Comparative study of operative procedures in typhoid perforation IJS. 2003;65(2):172-7.

Malik P, Yadav BL, Haldeniya K et al. A 3 Year Prospective Study of 1400 Cases of Perforation Peritonitis: Asia’s Largest Single Centre Study. Global J Med Res. 2014;14(3): 48-54.

Kemparaj T, Khadri S. Gastrointestinal perforations - our experience. Internet J Surg. 2012;28(2).

Vyas AK, Tanwani R, Raghuvanshi RS, Khantal N. A Prospective Study of Perforation Peritonitis in a Tertiary Health Care Centre of Central India. Ann Int Med Dental Res. 2017;3(2):SG67-SG69.

Ghosh PS, Mukherjee R, Sarkar S, Halder SK, Dhar D. Epidemiology of secondary peritonitis: analysis of 545 cases. Int J Sci Stud. 2016;3(12):83-8.

Jhobta RS, Attri AK, Kaushik R, Sharma R, Jhobta A. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis in India-review of 504 consecutive cases. World J Emergency Surg. 2006;1:26.

Shrestha K, Paudel BR, Shah LL. Spectrum of perforation peritonitis -260 cases experience. Postgraduate Med J NAMS. 2010;10(2):29-32.

Rao KS, Waddi S. Study of 100 Cases of outcome of peritonitis patients due to intestinal perforation depending on various clinical and biochemical para meters. J Med Res Pract. 2016;1(6):4-6.