DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20182775

A systemic analysis of patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair (2011-2017)

Esha A. Choudhry, Jenish Y. Sheth, Jitendra R. Darshan

Abstract


Background: The use of prosthetic mesh for reinforcing a hernia repair is considered most valid. Controversy exists regarding the use of the type of meshplasty. An insufficient evidence exists as to which type of mesh and mesh position (onlay, inlay, sublay (retrorectus) or preperitoneal) should be used. The effectiveness these methods have been systematically analysed in order to accelerate functional recovery and shorten hospitalization in patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair (VHR).

Methods: This was a Prospective randomized single blinded comparative study conducted in the Department of Surgery at SMIMER hospital, Surat for patients presenting with the complaint of anterior abdominal wall hernia over a duration of 6 years (September 2011 - September 2017) with an average follow up period of 12 months, including 318 adult patients. All patients were preoperatively assessed clinically and by ultrasonography to confirm the diagnosis and randomized for open VHR after obtaining a well-informed written consent and satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. 67% Patients (213/318) underwent retrorectus Meshplasty and were categorized into group A. The rest underwent Onlay (16.3% - 52/318)/Inlay (4.7% - 15/318)/Preperitoneal Meshplasty (11.9%-38/318) and were collectively (33% (105/318)) categorized into group B. Both Groups were Compared in terms differences in intra operative timing, intra operative complications, immediate post-operative outcome, early and delayed post- operative complications including readmission and recurrence rates.

Results: Authors observed significantly lesser post-operative pain, higher well being, reduced wound complications and recurrence rate in group A. Mean duration of surgery was insignificantly higher for retrorectus meshplasty.

Conclusions: Despite each method having its own advantages and disadvantages, retrorectus mesh repair was found superior because the mesh is placed with significant overlap under the muscular abdominal wall.


Keywords


Inlay, Onlay, Retrorectus, Sublay, Ventral Hernia Repair

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jack A. Maingot’s Abdominal operations. Edited by Zinner Michael J. and Schwartz Seymour I, Ellis Harold, 10th Edition, Appelton Century Crofts, 1997; 479-580.

Schumpelick V, Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Stumpf M. Retromuscular mesh repair for ventral incision hernia in Germany. Chirurg. 2002;73(9):888-94.

Elsesy A, Balba MA, Badr M, Latif MA. Retormascular preperitoneal versus traditional onlay mesh repair intreatment of incisional hernias. Menoufiya Med J. 2008;21:209-20.

Gleysteen JJ. Mesh-reinforced ventral hernia repair: preference for 2 techniques. Archives of Surgery. 2009;144(8):740-5.

Vidović D, Jurišić D, Franjić BD, Glavan E, Ledinsky M, Bekavac-Bešlin M. Factors affecting recurrence after incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2006;10(4):322-5.

Szczerba SR, Dumanian GA. Definitive surgical treatment of infected or exposed ventral hernia mesh. Ann Surg. 2003;237(3):437.

Jezupors A, Mihelsons M. The analysis of infection after polypropylene mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia. World J Surg. 2006;30(12):2270-78.

Kharde K, Dogra BB, Panchabhai S, Rana KV, Sridharan S, Kalyan S. A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair. Med J Dr. DY Patil Vidyapeeth. 2013;6(3):258-62.

Baracs J, Sajjadi GS, Kelemen D, Horvath OP, Vereczkei A. Open treatment of abdominal wall hernias: mesh repair is superior to suture repair and onlay mesh is better than sublay mesh-five-year multicentric, prospective, randomised clinical trial. Surgery Curr Res. 2016;6(270):2161-76.

Rajsiddharth B, Venkanna M, Kumar GA, Patlolla SR, Sriramoju S, Reddy BS. Comparative Study of Onlay and Pre-Peritoneal Mesh Repair in the Management of Ventral Hernias. Int J Sci Stud. 2015;3(7):121-8.

Shell DH, De La Torre J, Andrades P, Vasconez LO. Open repair of ventral incisional hernias. Surg Clin. 2008;88(1):61-83.

Csáky G, Bezsilla J, Botos A, Sikorszki L. Early results of various reconstructions of abdominal incisional hernias with Prolene mesh. Mag Seb. 2000;53(5):199-203.

den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW. Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. The Cochrane Library. 2008.

Israelsson LA, Smedberg S, Montgomery A, Nordin P, Spangen L. Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002. Hernia. 2006;10(3):258-61.

Langer C, Liersch T, Kley C, Flosman M, Süss M. Twenty-five years of experience in incisional hernia surgery. A comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia repairs. Chirurg.2003;74: 638-45.

de Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst BL, de Jong D, van der Wilt GJ, et al. Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques. Hernia. 2004;8(1):56-9.

Venclauskas L, Šilanskaitė J, Kanišauskaitė J, Kiudelis M. Long-term results of incisional hernia treatment. Medicina. 2007;43(11):855-60.

Vestweber KH, Lepique F, Haaf F, Horatz M, Rink A. Mesh plasties in abdominal wall recurrence hernia results. Central J Surg. 1997;122(10):885-8.

Godara R, Garg P, Raj H, Singla SL. Comparative Evaluation of sublay versus only Meshplasty in ventral hernias. Internet J Surge. 2006;8:30-2.