Laparoscopic marsupialization of pelvic lymphoceles following radical prostatectomy

Authors

  • Volkan Izol Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey
  • Fatih Gokalp Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey
  • Onur Karsli Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey
  • Eyup Kaplan Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey
  • Mutlu Deger Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey
  • Atilla I. Aridogan Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey
  • Zuhtu M. Tansug Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20182213

Keywords:

Laparoscopy, Lymphocele, Prostatectomy

Abstract

Background: In this study, we evaluated our laparoscopic marsupialization experiences in patients who had radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer and had lymphocele after the surgery.

Methods: Between October 2011 and December 2013, radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection were performed on 138 patients with prostate cancer diagnoses. Pelvic lymphocele was detected in 12 patients by ultrasonographic examination. Symptomatic patients to whom we applied drainage under ultrasonography and during whose follow-up lymphocele pouch was detected were hospitalized for laparoscopic marsupialization.

Results: The 5 prostatectomy patients had a mean age of 67.9±15 (52-72) years. The time needed for lymphocele development was, on average, 63±12 (51-79) days and the mean lymphocele size was 8.6±1.2 (8-9) cm. Surgery was performed in the supine position with a transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. The average operating time was 80±20 (60-100) minutes. Patients had no collection in their ultrasonographic control examinations performed after 2 and 6 weeks and they have been followed-up for an average time of 20 months without problems.

Conclusions: Although a limited number of patients were included in this study, the experience gained in urological laparoscopic operations indicates that laparoscopic marsupialization is an effective method that can be safely applied to treat lymphoceles requiring surgery.

References

Pepper RJ, Pati J, Kaisary AV. The incidence and treatment of lymphoceles after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2005;95:772-5.

Stolzenburg JU, Wasserscheid J, Rabenalt R, Do M, Schwalenberg T, McNeill A et al. Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration. World J Urol. 2008;26:581-6.

Khoder WY, Trottmann M, Buchner A, Stuber A, Hoffmann S, Stief CG et al. Risk factors for pelvic lymphoceles post-radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol. 2011;18:638-43.

Zargar-Shoshtari MA, Soleimani M, Salimi H, Mehravaran K. Symptomatic lymphocele after kidney transplantation: a single-center experience. Urol J. 2008;5(1):34-6.

Musch M, Klevecka V, Roggenbuck U, Kroepfl D. Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy in 1,380 patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1993 and 2006. J Urol 2008;179:923 -9.

Kim JK, Jeong YY, Kim YH, Kim YC, Kang HK, Choi HS. Postoperative pelvic lymphocele: treatment with simple percutaneous catheter drainage. Radiology. 1999;212:390-4.

Varga Z, Hegele A, Olbert P, Hoffmann R, Schrader AJ. Laparoscopic peritoneal drainage of symptomatic lymphoceles after pelvic lymph node dissection using methylene blue instillation. Urol Int. 2006;76:335-8.

Lattouf J, Beri A, Jeschke S, Sega W, Leeb K, Janetschek G. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: Description of the surgical technique and initial results. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1347-57.

Khoder WY, Trottmann M, Seitz M, Buchner A, Stuber A, Hoffmann S et al. Management of pelvic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy: a multicentre community based study. Eur J Med Res. 2011;16(6):280-4.

Augustin H, Hammerer P, Graefen M, Palisaar J, Noldus J, Fernandez S et al. Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002. Eur Urol. 2003;43:113-5.

Yamamoto R, Saitoh T, Kusaka T, Todo Y, Takeda M, Okamoto K et al. Prevention of lymphocyst formation following systematic lymphadenectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;30:397-400.

Gill IS, Hodge EE, Munch LC, Goldfarb DA, Novick AC, Lucas BA. Transperitoneal marsupialization of lymphoceles: a comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. J Urol. 1995;153:706-711.

Simforoosh N1, Nasseh H, Masoudi P, Aslzare M, Ghahestani SM, Eshratkhah R et al. Clipless laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection using bipolar electrocoagulation for sealing lymphatic vessels: initial series. Urol J. 2012;9(2):480-5.

Goralski P, Domagala P, Wszola M, Kieszek R, Drozdowski J, Diuwe P et al. Assesment of risk factors of a lymphocele following kidney transplantation. MEDtube Sci. 2014;2:40-4.

Iselin cE, Rochat cH, Morel P, Merlini M. Laparoscopic drainage of postoperative pelvic lymphocele. Br J Surg. 1994;81:274-5.

Fallick Ml, Long JP. Laparoscopic marsupialization of lymphocele after laparoscopic lymph node dissection. J Endourol. 1996;10:533-4.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles