DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181458

A study of surgical approach to typhoid ileal perforation at a tertiary care hospital of South Gujarat, India

Archana A. Nema, Jitendra R. Darshan

Abstract


Background: Even with variety of procedures, typhoid (enteric) perforation still has a high rate of morbidity and mortality. The aim of the present study is to study clinical presentations, to evaluate management pattern of typhoid ileal perforation, to determine mortality and morbidity of perforation and to study the re-exploration rate and causes of re-exploration and its effect on mortality and morbidity

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Departments of Surgery at Surat Municipal Institute of Medical Education and Research, Surat during June 2008 till October 2010. A total 45 patients with typhoid ileal perforation were included in the study. Among them, 32 cases (71%) undergone the simple primary closure of the perforation and peritoneal lavage after refreshing the edge, 7 cases (16%) undergone exploratory laparotomy with proximal loop ileostomy with primary closure and 6 (13%) were operated by exploratory laparotomy with resection anastomosis.

Results: Mean duration of the stay for patient undergone PC+PL was 10.20 days and for ileostomy it was 18.4 days and for RA + PL it was 18.6 days. Total 37 incidence of complications were found in 45 cases. Among them wound infection was presented in 16 (43%) and burst abdomen presented in 2 (5%) cases. Fecal fistulae, post-operative collection and pneumonitis were present in 4 (11%) cases each.

Conclusion: The overall mortality was found nearly 4 percent in our study. The typhoid ileal perforation should be always treated surgically. There are many operative techniques to deal with, but no one is full proof.


Keywords


Enteric fever, Ileal perforation, Ileostomy, Resection anastomosis, Typhoid fever

Full Text:

PDF

References


Crump JA, Luby SP, Mintz ED: The global burden of typhoid fever. World Health Organ Bull 2004, 82:346-53.

Siddiqui FJ, Rabbani F, Hasan R, Nizami SQ, Bhutta ZA. Typhoid fever in children: some epidemiological considerations from Karachi, Pakistan. Int J Infect Dis. 2006;10(3):215-22.

Govt. of India (2010), National health profile 2009, DGHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi. Available at http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/index2.asp?slid=1068&sublinkid=721

WHO. Weekly Epidemiological Record, No. 6, 8th Feb, 2008. Available at www.who.int/wer/2008/wer8306/en/

Osifo OD, Ogiemwonyi SO. Typhoid ileal perforation in children in Benin city. Afr J Paed Surg. 2010;7(2):96.

Hosoglu S, Aldemir M, Akalin S, Geyik MF, Tacyildiz IH, Loeb M: Risk factors for enteric perforation in patients with typhoid Fever. Am J Epidemiol. 2004,160(1):46-50.

Kotan C, Kosem M, Tuncer I, Kisli E, Sonmez R, Cikman O, Soylemez O, Arslanturk H: Typhoid intestinal perforation: Review of 11 cases. Kolon Rektum Hast Derg. 2000;11(12):6-10.

Atamanalp SS, Aydinli B, Ozturk G, Oren D, Basoglu M, Yildirgan MI: Typhoid intestinal perforations: twenty-six year experience. World J Surg. 2007,31(9):1883-8.

Huckstep RL. Recent advanced in surgery of typhoid fever. Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl. 1960;26(4): 207-80.

Kim JP, Oh SK, Jarret F. Management of ideal perforation due to typhoid fever. Ann surg. 1975;181(1):88-91.

Singh S, Singh K, Grover AS, Kumar P, Singh G, Gupta DK. Two-layer closure of typhoid ileal perforations: a prospective study of 46 cases. Br J Surg. 1995;82(9):1253.

Olurin EO, Ajavi OO, Bohrer SP. Typhoid perforations. J Roy Coll Surg Edinb. 1972;17(253):353-63.

Swadia ND, Trivedi PM, Thakkar AM. Problem of enteric ileal perforation. Indian J Surg. 1979;41:643-51.

Adesunkanmi ARK, Ajao OG. Prognostic factors in Typhoid ileal perforation: a prospective study in 50 patients.’ R Coll Surg Edinb. 1997;42(6):395-9.

Adesunkanmi ARK, Badmas TA, Fadiora FO. Generalised peritonitis secondary to typhoid ileal perforation: assessment of severity using modified APACHE II score. Indian J Surg. 2005;67(1):29-33.

Chatterjee H, Jagdish S, Pai D, Satish N, Jayadev D, Reddy PS. Changing trends in outcome of typhoid ileal perforations over three decades in Pondicherry. Trop Gastroentoral. 2001;22(3):155-8.

Khan SH, Aziz SA, Ul-Haq MI. Perforated peptic ulcers: A review of 36 Cases. Professional Med J. 2011;18(1):124-7.

Lee CW, Yip AW, Lam KH. Pneumogastrogram in the diagnosis of Perforated peptic ulcer. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993;63:459-61.

Chen SC, Yen ZS, Wang HP, Lin FY, Hsu CY, Chen WJ. Ultrasonography is superior to plain radiography in the diagnosis of pneumoperitonium. Br J Surg. 2002;89:351-4.

Santillana M. Surgical complications of typhoid fever: enteric perforation. World J Surg. 1991;15(2):170-5.

Kaul BK. Operative management of typhoid perforation in children. Int Surg. 1975;60(8):407-10.

Vaidyanathan S. Surgical management of typhoid ileal perforation. Ind J Surg. 1986;335-41.

Beniwal US, Jindal D, Sharma J, Jain S, Shyam G. Comparative study of operative procedures in typhoid perforation. Indian J Surg. 2003;65(2):172-77.

Talwar S, Sharma RK, Mittal DK, Prasad P. Typhoid enteric perforation. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997;67:351-3.

Singh KP, Singh K, Kohli JS. Choice of surgical procedure in typhoid perforation: Experience in 42 cases. J Indian Med Assoc. 1991; 89(9):255-6.