DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181403

Loop transverse colostomy versus loop ileostomy after low and ultralow anterior resection

Ayman M. A. Ali

Abstract


Background: Since the introduction of sphincter saving procedures for low and mid-rectal carcinoma and the associated high anastomotic leakage rate is a matter of troublesome. There is a consensus between surgeons that diverting proximal stoma decreases the incidence of clinical leakage. But the choice between loop transverse colostomy (LTC) and loop ileostomy (LI) still a matter of debate. In this study we tried to compare both methods and evaluate the outcome of each.

Methods: This is a prospective observational study included 28 patients suffering from mid- or low-rectal cancer who underwent elective low anterior resection (LARs), admitted to Sohag University Hospital between July 2013 to July 2017. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups; group (A) included 15 patients and managed with LTC, and group (B) included 13 patients and managed with LI. The data of the patients were collected, tabulated and analyzed, with special consideration of the general outcome measures related to stoma construction, special outcome measures related to stoma construction, and the outcome measures related to stoma closure. All of the patients were followed up for 6 months.

Results: Author found a significantly higher incidence rate of skin excoriation (p<0.001), leaks from the appliance (p<0.005), in the LI group than in the LTC group and higher incidence of parastomal hernia (p=0.042) in the LTC than in the LI. Also, author found a significantly higher incidence rate of intestinal obstruction in the LI group (p<0.001), also we found a significantly higher incidence of wound infection after stoma closure (p=0.006) in the LTC group than in the LI group. The mean time to first bowel movement (days) was earlier in the LI than LTC group and showing also a significant value (p<0.001). The mean cumulative total hospital stay was significantly longer in the LTC group than in the LI group (p<0.001).

Conclusions: LTC and LI; both have advantages and disadvantages and the use of any for fecal diversion after low and mid-rectal carcinoma should be considered for every patient individually according to his circumstances.

 


Keywords


Colostomy, Ileostomy, Low rectal carcinoma, Stoma

Full Text:

PDF

References


Williams NS. The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1984;71:575-81.

Moore HG, Riedel E, Minsky BD, Saltz L, Paty P, Wong D, et al. Adequacy of 1-cm distal margin after restorative rectal cancer resection with sharp mesorectal excision and preoperative combinedmodality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:80-5.

Bordeianou L, Maguire LH, Alavi K, Sudan R, Wise PE, Kaiser AM. Sphincter-sparing surgery in patients with low-lying rectal cancer: techniques, oncologic outcomes, and functional results. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1358-72.

Belalla D, Kacani N, Gjata A. Evaluation of protective stoma in rectal cancer surgery. Merit Res. J Med Med Sci. 2016;4:21-4.

Seo SI, Yu CS, Kim GS, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Kim CW, et al. Characteristics and risk factors associated with permanent stomas after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2013;37:2490-6.

Xun J, Zhou XH, Zhou X and Guan X. Anastomotic leakage prevention in elderly patients with lower colorectal cancer total mesorectal excision and anal sphincter preservation surgery. Chinese J Surg Oncol. 2012;4:375-6.

Wang S, Zhang Z, Liu M, Li S and Jiang C. Efficacy of transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:92.

Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, Rullier A, Vendrely V, Zerbib F. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg. 2005;241:465-9.

Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, Barberini F, Guerrisi A, Izzo L, et al. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:479-88.

Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:211-6.

Shiomi A, Ito M, Saito N, Hirai T, Ohue M, Kubo Y, et al. The indications for a diverting stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective multicentre study of 222 patients from Japanese cancer centers. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:1384-9.

Qu H, Liu Y, Bi DS. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:3608-17.

Liu L, Huang Q, Wang J, Chen Q, Lin R, Ge B. Protection of low rectal anastomosis with a new tube ileostomy using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring. A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:45(e5345).

Wu SW, Ma CC, Yang Y. Role of protective stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:18031-7.

Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 4th ed. London: Balliere Tindall 1984:759-62.

Alexander-Williams J. Loop ileostomy and colostomy for faecal diversion. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1974;54:141-8.

Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg. 2000;179:92-6.

Sakai Y, Nelson H, Larson D, Maidl L, Young-Fadok T, Ilstrup D. Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy in diversion: a case-matched study. Arch Surg. 2001;136:338-42.

Khoury GA, Lewis MC, Meleagros L, Lewis AA. Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomized trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987;69:5-7.

Mattei P‏، Nichol‏ P F, Rollins M D, Muratore CS (eds.). Fundamentals of Pediatric Surgery: Second Edition, Springer International Publishing AG; 2017:479-485.

Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG. Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg. 1998;85:76-9.

García-Botello SA, García-Armengol J, García-Granero E, Espí A, Juan C, López-Mozos F et al. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg. 2004;21:440-6.

Kaidar-Person O, Person B, Wexner SD. Complications of Construction and Closure of Temporary Loop ileostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:759-73.

O’Leary DP, Fide CJ, Foy C, Lucarotti ME. Quality of life after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and temporary loop illeostomy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1216-20.

Lindgren R, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R, Matthiessen P. What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:41-7.

Klink CD, Lioupis K, Binnebösel M, Kaemmer D, Kozubek I, Grommes J et al. Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy?. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:431-6.

Kumar V L, Sathyanarayana K V. A Comparative Study between Santulli Ileostomy and Loop Ileostomy. (IOSR-JDMS). 2016;15:36-40.

Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2001;88:360-3.

Güenaga KF, Silva Lustosa SA, Saad SS, Saconato H, Matos D. Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Cirúrgica Brasilia. 2008;23:294-303.

Fasth S, Hulten L, Palselius I. Loop ileostomy: an attractive alternative to a temporary transverse colostomy. Acta Chir Scand. 1980;146:203.

Afridi SS, Ahmed N, Zarin M, Muslim M, Aurangzeb M. Outcome of Loop Ileostomy Reversal: A Prospective Study. KMUJ 2013;5:3.

Bradley JG. Pelvic adhesions. Ob Gyn. net 2011. Available at: http://www.obgyn.net/laparoscopy/pelvic-adhesions.

Tang CL, Seow-Choen F, Fook-Chong S, Eu KW. Bioresorbable adhesion barrier facilitates early closure of the defunctioning ileostomy after rectal excision: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1200-7.

Akesson O, Syk I, Lindmark G, Buchwald P. Morbidity related to defunctioning loop ileostomy in low anterior resection. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:1619-23.

Riesener KP, Lehnen W, Höfer M, Kasperk R, Braun JC, and Schumpelick V. Morbidity of ileostomy and colostomy closure: impact of surgical technique and perioperative treatment. World J Surg. 1997;21:103-8.

Metcalf MA, Dozois RR, Beart RW Jr, Wolff BG. Temporary ileostomyfor ileal pouch anal anastomosis: Functions and complications. Dis Colon Rect. 1986;29:300-3.

Feinberg SM, Macleod RS and Cohen Z. Complications of loop ileostomy. Am J Surg. 1987;153:102-7.

Rullier E, Letoux N, Laurant C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J. Loop ileostomy vs loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomosis during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2001;25:274-7.

Fazekas B, Fazekas B, Hendricks J, Smart N, Arulampalam T. The incidence of incisional hernias following ileostomy reversal in colorectal cancer patients treated with anterior resection. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017;99:319-24.