DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180976

Clinicopathological study and management of biliary stones

Dasari Naresh, Darshan A. Manjunath, S. R. Harwal, Veerabhadra Radhakrishna

Abstract


Background: Biliary calculi are one of the most common problems affecting the digestive tract. Need for the study is to evaluate age, sex, incidence, most common etiopathological factors for the formation of biliary calculi and to illustrate varying clinical presentation with various modes of management adopted in the institution as well as to analyse biochemical types of stones prevalent in the region.

Methods: A prospective study of 50 patients with clinical diagnosis of biliary colic was conducted in a tertiary center for a period of one year. Clinical presentation, etiology, and management of biliary calculi were studied.

Results: Biliary calculi affect most commonly in fourth to the fifth decade with a higher preponderance in females (72%). Right hypochondriac pain is the commonest presentation (84%). Ultrasonography is sensitive and specific, and hence considered the investigation of choice. Open surgical procedures such as cholecystectomy, choledochotomy with T-tube drainage, choledochoduodenostomy were done in these subjects. Postoperative complications such as wound infection noted in 8% of the subjects. Most of the histopathological specimens (90%) revealed chronic cholecystitis.

Conclusions: Biliary calculus disease is multifactorial in origin with slight female preponderance. The most common presentation is a right hypochondriac pain. This can be diagnosed accurately with the aid of ultrasonography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-pancreatography. Biliary calculus is managed according to the location of the calculus, whether intrahepatic or extrahepatic. Most of the patients presented with chronic cholecystitis. 


Keywords


Biliary calculi, Cholecystitis, Cholecystectomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JB, et al. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 9th Ed. USA: McGraw Hill; 2010.

Brett M, Barker DJ. The world distribution of gallstones. Int J Epidemiol. 1976;5(4):335-41.

Brasca A, Berli D, Pezzotto SM, Gianguzzo MP, Villavicencio R, Fray O, et al. Morphological and demographic associations of biliary symptoms in subjects with gallstones: findings from a population-based survey in Rosario, Argentina. Dig Liver Dis. 2002;34:577-81.

Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Sabiston textbook of surgery, 19th Edition, Philadelphia. Elsevier: Saunders; 2012.

Ganey JB, Johnson PA Jr, Prillaman PE, McSwain GR. Cholecystectomy: Clinical experience with a large series. Am J Surg. 1986;352-7.

Moreaux J. Prospective study of open cholecystectomy for calculus biliary disease. Br J Surg. 1994;81:116-9.

Raza MH, Khan MA, Naim M. Gallstone disease, Ind J Surg. 1990:415-20.

Su CH, Pleng FK, Lui WY. Factors affecting morbidity and mortality in biliary tract surgery. World J Surg. 1992;16536-40.

Goswitz JT. Bacteria and biliary tract disease. Am J Surg. 1974;128(5):644-6.

Hansell DT, Millar MA, Murray WR, Gray GR, Gillespie G. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients with intact gallbladders. Br J Surg. 1989;76(8):856-8.

Saxena R, Kumar P. Spectrum of benign biliary disease as seen in Chandigarh. Ind J Surg. 1991;53:347-58.

Kullman E, Borch K, Dahlin LG, Liedberg G. Long-term follow-up of patients with gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Eur J Surg. 1991;157(2):131-5.

Braghetto I, Csendes A, de la Cuadra R, Schutte H, Diaz JC, Burdiles P, et al. Treatment of residual common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterol. 1989;36(3):123-7.

Lygidakis NJ. Hazards following T-tube removal after choledochotomy. Surg Gyn obstet. 1986;163(2):153-5.

Pappas TN, Slimane TB, Brooks DC. Hundred consecutive common duct explorations without mortality. Ann Surg. 1990;211(3):260-2.