DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181592

Effect of varicocelectomy on seminogram in patients with clinical varicocele

Tulit Chhabra, Satish Dalal, Sant Prakash, Nityasha Nara, Chisel Bhatia, Jagat Pal Beniwal

Abstract


Background: Despite various studies published in the recent years, efficacy of varicocelectomy and its influence on semen parameters, particularly sperm count, motility and morphology has not yet been determined. Conflicting results obtained in different studies, accounts for sparked interest in varicocele management and its effects on seminal parameters. Therefore, present study was designed in an attempt to evaluate the effect of varicocelectomy on the semen parameters by analyzing reports that included men with varicoceles who had both preoperative and postoperative semen examination done.

Methods: The present prospective study enrolled fifty patients. Varicocele was graded by Dubin grading system by palpation in standing and during Valsalva maneuver under adequate exposure and illumination. Macro and microscopic assessment of semen samples was carried out according to WHO guidelines. The surgical approach used for varicocelectomy was inguinal (Modified Ivanissevich procedure).

Results: Significant improvement in semen parameters viz sperm counts/ml, sperm counts/ejaculate and sperm motility were observed after varicocelectomy. We noted no effect of patient’s age on the degree of improvement in semen parameters post operatively. Preoperatively, men with Grade III varicoceles had lower sperm counts and sperm motility, but significant improvement was observed post-operatively compared to men with Grades I and II varicoceles.

Conclusions: Our study supports the fact that, varicocele exerts a deleterious effect upon sperm motility, concentration and repair of varicocele leads to improvement in these seminal parameters. The repair of larger varicocele seems to be a predictor for better post-repair semen parameters. Varicocele is a treatable cause of male infertility (primary and secondary), so patients undergoing varicocelectomy should have a pre-operative and post-operative semen examination done routinely.


Keywords


Ivanissevich procedure, Seminogram, Varicocele, WHO

Full Text:

PDF

References


Raheem AO. Surgical management of adolescent varicocele: Systematic review of Literature. Urol Ann. 2013;5(3):133-9.

Shabana W, Teleb M, Dawod T, Elsayed E, Desoky E, Shanin A, et al. Predictors of improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy for male subfertility: A prospective study. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(9-10):E579-82.

Brown JS. Varicocelectomy in the sub fertile male: a ten-year experience with 295 cases. Fertil Steril. 1976; 27(9):1046-53.

Naughton CK, Nangia AK, Agarwal A. Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(5):473-81.

Twigg J, Fulton N, Gomez E, Irvine DS, Aitken RJ. Analysis of the impact of intracellular reactive oxygen species generation on the structural and functional integrity of human spermatozoa: lipid peroxidation, DNA fragmentation and effectiveness of antioxidants. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;13(6):1429-36.

Prathami T, Rajani S, Pandiyan S. History of semen analysis. Chettinad Health City Medical Journal. 2015;4(1):63-4.

Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, Agarwal R, Short RA, Sabanegh E, et al. Efficacy of Varicocelectomy in Improving Semen Parameters: New Meta-analytical Approach. Urol. 2007:70(3):533-8.

Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol. 1992;148(6):1808-11.

Marmar JL, Kim Y. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: a technical critique and statistical analysis of semen and pregnancy data. J Urol. 1994;152(4):1127-32.

Krause W, Muller HH, Schafer H, Weidner W. Does treatment of varicocele improve male fertility? Results of the “Deutsche Varikozelenstudie,” a multicentre study of 14 collaborating centres. Andrologia. 2002:34(3);164-71.

Breznik R, Vlaisavljevic V, Borko E. Treatment of varicocele and male fertility. Arch Androl. 1993:30(3);157-60.

Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970;21(8):606-9.

Bodal VK, Malik R, Kaur S, Bal MS, Kaur P, Bhagat R, et al. A seminogram in male partners of infertile couples. Int J Med Dent Sci. 2014;3(1):276-84.

Kass EJ, Belman AB. Reversal of testicular growth failure by varicocele ligation. J Urol. 1987;137(3):475-6.

Samplaski MK, Yu C, Kattan MW, Lo KC, Grober ED. Nomograms for predicting changes in semen parameters in infertile men after varicocele repair. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):68-74.

Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, Dohle G, Jarvi K, Salonia A, et al., Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: A new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):796-808.

Huang HC, Huang ST, Chen Y, Hsu YC, Chang PC, Hsieh ML, et al. Prognostic factors for successful varicocelectomy to treat varicocele‑associated male infertility. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2014;26(3):485-90.

Comhaire, F.H. and Kunnen, M.: Factors affecting the probability of conception after treatment of subfertile men with varicocele by transcatheter embolization with bucrylate. Fertil. Steril. 1985;43(5):781-6.

Reşorlu B, Kara C, Sahin E, Unsal A. The significance of age on success of surgery for patients with varicocele. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010;42(2):351-6.

Liguori G, Ollandini G, Pomara G, Amodeo A, Bertolotto M, Mazzon G, et al. Role of renospermatic basal reflow and age on semen quality improvement after sclerotization of varicocele. Urology. 2010;75(5):1074-8.

Lipshultz L, Corriere J. Progressive testicular atrophy in the varicocele patient. J Urol. 1977;117(2):175-6.

Zini A, Boman J, Jarvi K, Baazeem A. Varicocelectomy for infertile couples with advanced paternal age. Urology. 2008;72(1):109-13.

Steckel J, Dicker AP, Goldstein M. Relationship between varicocele size and response to varicocelectomy. J Urol. 1993;149(4):769-71.

Takahara M, Ichikawa T, Shiseki Y, Nakamura T, Shimazaki J. Relationship between grade of varicocele and the response to varicocelectomy. Int J Urol. 1996;3(4):282-5.

Ishikawa T, Fujisawa M. Effect of age and grade on surgery for patients with varicocele. Urol. 2005;65(4):768-72.