Comparative study of mean operating time and hospital stay in sutures and cyanoacrylate glue mesh fixation in inguinal hernia repair

Authors

  • Ashrith Iyanahally Department of Surgery, Mount Zion medical college, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
  • Abhilash Gautham Ramesh Department of Surgery, Shimoga institute of medical sciences, Shimoga, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180990

Keywords:

Cyanoacrylate glue, Hospital stay, Operating time

Abstract

Background: Hernia is a protrusion of a viscus or part of a viscus through an abnormal opening in the walls of its containing cavity. A hernia is the bulging of part of contents of the abdominal cavity through a weakness in the abdominal wall. Inguinal hernia repair is the most frequently performed operation in any general surgical unit. To compare the mean operating time and total duration of hospital stay between sutures and cyanoacrylate glue mesh fixation in inguinal hernia repair in a medical college setup.

Methods: All patients presenting to B.L.D. E. U’s Shri B. M. Patil Medical College Hospital and Research Centre Bijapur and admitted patients in whom the diagnosis of primary inguinal hernia is considered from October 2013 to June 2015.

Results: Operating time was significantly less that is 36.52 min in cyanoacrylate group and 48.32 in suture fixation group. Hospital stay in cyanoacrylate group was 4.82 days and in suture fixation group was 6.48 days. Two days is considered as preoperative work up period in both the groups as it is a medical college setup.

Conclusions: Lichtenstein tension free hernioplasty is always better option if mesh fixation done with N-butyl cyanoacrylate when compared with Lichtenstein’s tension free hernia repair with standard prolene suture fixation.

 

References

Mark A, Malangoni, Rosen MJ. Sabiston textbook of surgery 2, 19th Ed. Saunders;2012:1114-5.

Nixon SJ, Bruce T. Abdominal wall, hernia and umbilicus. Bailey and love’s 26th Edition. 2013:948.

Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. Demographic, classificatory, and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surgical Clinics of North America. 1993 Jun 1;73(3):413-26.

Sherman V, Macho JR, Brunicardi FC. Inguinal hernias. Schwartz’s principles of surgery. 9th Edition. McGraw-Hill Professional; 9 ed;2009:1339-40.

Kim-Fuchs C, Angst E, Vorburger S, Helbling C, Candinas D, Schlumpf R. Prospective randomized trial comparing sutured with sutureless mesh fixation for Lichtenstein hernia repair: long-term results. Hernia. 2012 Feb 1;16(1):21-7.

Wound Adhesives, 2 Octylcyanoacrylate. Available at: www.emedicine.com. Accessed 12 April 2005.

Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Strobbe L, Rosman C, Groenewoud H, Bleichrodt R. Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systemic review. Am J Surg. 2007;194:394-400.

Hetzer FH, Hotz T, Steinke W, Schlumpf R, Decurtins M, Largiader F. Gold standard for inguinal hernia repair: shouldice or Lichtenstein? Hernia. 1999;3:117-20.

Testini M, Lissidini G, Poli E, Gurrado A, Lardo D, Piccinni G. A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing sutures, N-butyl-2 cyanoacrylate and human fibrin glue for mesh fixation during primary inguinal hernia repair. Can J Surg. 2010;53(3):155.

Kim-Fuchs C, Angst E, Vorburger S, Helbling C, Candinas D, Schlumpf R. Prospective randomized trial comparing sutured with sutureless mesh fixation for Lichtenstein hernia repair: long-term results. Hernia. 2012 Feb 1;16(1):21-7.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles