DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181577

Indications and safety of plastibell circumcision in children

Chimaobi G. Ofoha, Sankey J. Babangida, Lemech E. Nabasu, Nuhu K. Dakum

Abstract


Background: Circumcision is the surgical excision of the prepuce. It is an ancient practice with roots in religion and cultural practices. Indications for circumcision include phimosis, paraphimosis, balanoposthitis, balanitis, Balanitis xerotica obliterans and trauma to the prepuce. Various methods of circumcision have been described; Flap method, Gomco, Smartklamp and Plastibell etc. The Plastibell works by the clamp principle. The aim of this study is to determine the indications and safety of circumcision using the Plastibell device.

Methods: This was a prospective study carried out in two hospitals for a period of one year. The parents were counselled on the procedure. The children were assessed to identify conditions that might adversely affect the outcome. The age of the babies, indication, size of Plastibel and complications were recorded.

Results: Two hundred and forty-five infants were enrolled into the study. The age range was seven to one hundred and sixty-eight days. Majority of the circumcision was done in the first thirty days of life (63.8%). Indication for circumcision was religion (n=245, 100%) in all cases. The range of the Plastibel size used was 1.1 to 1.5. Ten of the children had complications representing 4.1%. The commonest complication was retained Plastibel, constituting 50% of the overall complications followed by bleeding (30%).

Conclusions: Religion was the indication for the circumcisions and most of the circumcisions were done in the neonatal period. The Plastibell method of circumcision is associated with minor remediable complications when performed by trained personal.


Keywords


Complication, Circumcision, Indication, Plastibell, Safety

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kaplan GW. Circumcision-an overview. Curr Probl Pediatr. 1977;7(5):1-33.

Warner E, Strashin E. Benefits and risks of circumcision. Can Med Assoc J. 1981;125(9):967-76

Holman JR, Lewis EL, Ringler RL. Neonatal circumcision techniques. Am Fam Physician. 1995; 52(2):511-8.

Pinto K. Circumcision controversies. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012;59(4):977-86.

Lukong CS. Circumcision: Controversies and Prospects. J Surg Technique Case Report. 2011;3(2):65-6.

Halioua B, Lobel B. Actual controversies about circumcision. Presse Med. 2014;43(11):1168-73.

Senkul T, IşerI C, şen B, KarademIr K, Saraçoglu F, Erden D. Circumcision in adults: effect on sexual function. Urology. 2004;63(1):155-8

Kim D, Pang MG. The effect of male circumcision on sexuality. BJU Int. 2007; 99(3):619-22.

Al-Marhoon MS, Jaboub SM. Plastibell Circumcision: How Safe is it? Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal. 2006;6(1):17-20.

Bioku M, Ikuerowo SO, Igwilo C, Omisanjo OA, Adewumi O, Esho JO. Plastibell circumcision of 2,276 male infants: a multi-centre study. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;23:35-40.

Drain PK, Halperin DT, Hughes JP, Klausner JD, Bailey RC. Male circumcision, religion, and infectious diseases: an ecologic analysis of 118 developing countries. BMC Infectious Diseases.2006; 6(1):172-10.

Singh-Grewal D, Macdessi J, Craig J. Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies.Arch Dis Child. 2005; 90(8):853-8.

Malone P, Steinbrecher H. Medical aspects of male circumcision. BMJ. 2007;335(7631):1206-9.

Lazarus J, Alexander A, Rode H. Circumcision complications associated with the Plastibell device. S Afr Med J. 2007;97(3):192-3.

Bode CO, Ikhisemojie S, Ademuyiwa AO. Penile injuries from proximal migration of the Plastibell circumcision ring. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6(1):23-7.

Manji KP. Circumcision of the young infant in a developing country using the Plastibell. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2000;20(2):101-4.

Palit V, Menebhi DK, Taylor I, Young M, Elmasry Y, Shah T. A unique service in UK delivering Plastibell circumcision: review of 9-year results. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23(1):45-8.

Moosa FA, Khan FW, Rao MH. Comparison of complications of circumcision by 'Plastibell device technique' in male neonates and infants. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010; 60(8):664-7.

Fraser IA, Allen MJ, Bagshaw PF, Johnstone M. A randomized trial to assess childhood circumcision with the Plastibell device compared to a conventional dissection technique. Br J Surg. 1981;68(8):593-5.