Common sites and causes of chronic cervical lymphadenopathy among a sample of Iraqi patients

Authors

  • Hussein Ali Alkumasi Department of Surgery, Al-Karama, Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Mohammed Reda Al Ghadhban Department of Surgery, Al-Karama, Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Faris Talib Mohammed Department of Surgery, Al-Karama, Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180798

Keywords:

Cervical, Diagnosis, Lymphadenopathy, Site

Abstract

Background: Chronic cervical lymphadenopathy may result from a variety of different underlying diseases. It could be a sign of inflammation, metastatic tumor or lymphoma.

Methods: This is a prospective study of 60 patients with cervical lymphadenopathy who attended Al Karama Teaching Hospital for the period (1/12/2008 to 1/2/2010). Data includes their demographic information, clinical presentation, investigations and histopathological results.

Results: Twenty six patients were males (43.3%) and 34 were females (56.7%). The male to female ratio was 1:1.3. Age distribution had shown that the highest incidence occurred in those between (11-20) years old (15 patients, 25%), followed by those between (1-10) years old. The mean age was 31.2±21.5 SD. The most common cause of cervical lymphadenopathy was reactive hyperplasia (23 patients, 38.3%) followed by Tuberculous lymphadenopathy (15patients, 25%). Lymphomas (13 patients, 21.7%) and metastatic deposits (7 patients, 11.7%).

Conclusions: The most common cause of cervical lymphadenopathy was reactive hyperplasia followed by tuberculous lymphadenopathy. Tuberculous lymphadenopathy continues to be a major health problem, and this may be explained by situation in this country in the last few decades that affected the socio-economic, health care and the living standard of population.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Farquharson, Moran. Farquharson’s textbook of operative surgery, surgery of the neck, 9th Ed. Hodder Arnold; 2005:159-160.

Pangalis GA, Vassilakopoulos TP, Boussiotis VA. Clinical approach to lymphadenopathy. Semin Oncol. 1993;20:570-82.

Fijten GH, Blijham GH. Unexplained lymphadenopathy in family practice. an evaluation of the probability of malignant causes and the effectiveness of physicians’ workup. J Fam Pract. 1988;27:373-6.

Moore KL, Agur AM, Dalley AF. Essential clinical anatomy: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia; 2002.

Chau I, Kelleher MT, Cunningham D. Rapid access multidisciplinary lymph node diagnostic clinic: analysis of 550 patients. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:354-61.

Abba AA, Bamgboye AE, Afzal M. Lymphadenopathy in adults: a clinicopathological analysis. Saudi Med J. 2002;23:282-6.

Al-Sohaibani MO, Satti MB, Ibrahim E, Al-Sowayan S. Histologic patterns of lymphadenopathy in the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 1990;10:516-20.

Morad N, Malatani T, Khan AR, Hussain N. Peripheral Lymphadenopathy as a primary presenting sign. A study of 324 cases from Asir Region. Annals of Saudi Medicine. 1990;12:72-5.

Reddy MP, Moorchung N, Chaudhary A. Clinico-pathological profile of pediatric lymphadenopathy. Indian J Pediatr. 2002;69(12):1047-51.

Josefine S. Cytological diagnosis of reactive lymphadenopathy. Actacytological. 1987;31:8-13.

Suskind DL. Nonbacterial Non tuberculous Mycobacterial cervicaladenitis, Clinical Pediatrics Journal. 1997;36(7):403-9.

Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL. Pathologic Basis of Disease, 6th Ed. Philadelphia, Saunders; 1999:649-650.

Rubbin E, Farber JL. Pathology 3rd Ed. Philadelphia Lippincott; 1999:1095-1099.

Martin DA, James OA, Allen SL, John EN. Clinical Oncology. 2nded. London (UK): Churchill Livingstone Inc; 2000:2620-2629.

Al-Doori, Al-Ani. role of FNAC in the diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy. A thesis submitted to the Iraqi Commission for medical specialization in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of fellowship in general surgery. 1998.

Gonshal AG. Diagnosis of Tuberculosis, Journal of Indian Medical Association. 2005;98(3).

Ibrahim M, Sayed AA. Cervical lymph node biopsy: Clinical and histological significance; Saudi Medical Journal. 2002;23(10):1291-2.

Martin DA, James OA, Allen SL, John EN. Clinical Oncology. 2nded. London (UK): Churchill Livingstone Inc; 2000:2620-2629.

Abba AA, Bamgboye AE, Afzal M, Rahmatullah RA. Lymphadenopathy in adults. A clinicopathological analysis. Saudi medical journal. 2002;23(3):282-6.

Freidig EE, McClure SP, Wilson WR, Banks PM, Washington JA. Clinical-histologic-microbiologic analysis of 419 lymph node biopsy specimens. Rev Infect Dis. 1986;8:322-8.

Sriwatanawongsa V, Cardoso R, Chang P Incidence of malignancy in peripheral lymph node biopsy. Amer Surg. 1985;51:587-90.

Tiwari M, Maharjan S, Ranabhat S. Histopathological diagnosis of lymph node biopsies Postgraduate Med J. 2005;77:185-7.

Pangalis GA, Vassilakopoulos TP, Boussiotis VA, Fessas P. Clinical approach to lymphadenopathy. In Seminars in Oncology. 1993 Dec;20(6):570.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-26

How to Cite

Alkumasi, H. A., Al Ghadhban, M. R., & Mohammed, F. T. (2018). Common sites and causes of chronic cervical lymphadenopathy among a sample of Iraqi patients. International Surgery Journal, 5(3), 892–896. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180798

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles