Open mesh repair, is still a standard technique for incisional hernia: a comparision study between sublay and onlay technique in the era of laparoscopy

Authors

  • Yamanur P. Lamani Department of General Surgery, SN Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India
  • Subhash N. Halbhavi Department of General Surgery, SN Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India
  • Bheemangowda V. Goudar Department of General Surgery, SN Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India
  • Eshwar B. Kalaburgi Department of General Surgery, SN Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India
  • Veerabhadra Gowd Y. C. Department of General Surgery, SN Medical College, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180489

Keywords:

Incisional hernia, Laparoscopy, Onlay mesh, Sublay mesh

Abstract

Background: Incisional hernia (IH) remains a very frequent postoperative complication and common hernias in middle aged population more commonly in females. The two techniques most frequently used are the onlay repair and sublay repair. Various studies have been conducted to compare the advantages and disadvantages of sublay and onlay mesh repair in incisional hernia and the superiority of sublay mesh repair. These studies whether they hold good for the population is a pertinent question. In view of this, author need to study the appropriate surgical techniques sublay versus onlay repair in the set up.

Methods: Author conducted randomized comparative study of 100 patients having incisional hernia admitted to various surgical units of SNMC and HSK Hospital, Bagalkot during the period December 2014 to June 2016.

Results: In present study of 100 cases, females have more incidence of incisional hernias than males. In onlay technique seroma formation was found in 72% of patients postoperatively and 4% in sublay technique. Surgical site infection (SSIN) was noticed in 8% of sublay technique whereas 12% in onlay technique. There is no recurrence in sublay group whereas onlay had 12% recurrence.

Conclusions: Sublay technique is superior to onlay concerning the hospital stay, complications and recurrence.

References

Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10 years prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg. 1985;72:70-1.

Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Einflussfaktoren der Narbenhernienentstehung Retrospektive Untersuchung an 2.983 laparotomierten Patienten über einen Zeitraum von 10 Jahren. Der Chirurg. 2002 May 1;73(5):474-80.

Berger RL, Li LT, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Kao LS, Liang MK. Development and validation of a risk-stratification score for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surgeons. 2013;217(6):974-82.

Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Vick CC, Hawn MT. Effect of mesh type and position on subsequent abdominal operations after incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surgeons. 2011 Apr 1;212(4):496-502.

Bencini L, Sanchez LJ. Learning curve for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg. 2004;187:378-82.

Binnebösel M, Klink CD, Otto J, Conze J, Jansen PL, Anurov M, et al. Impact of mesh positioning on foreign body reaction and collagenous ingrowth in a rabbit model of open incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2010 Feb 1;14(1):71-7.

Johansson M, Gunnarsson U, Strigard K. Different techniques for mesh application give the same abdominal muscle strength. Hernia. 2011;15:65-8.

Ko R, Kazacos EA, Snyder S. Tensile strength comparison ofsmall intestinal submucosa body wall repair. J Surg Res. 2006;135:9-17.

Rohrich RJ, Lowe JB, Hackney FL, Bowman JL, Hobar PC. An algorithm for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 2000;105:202-16.

Condon RE. Prosthetic repair of abdominal hernia. In: Nyhus L, Condon RE (eds). 3rd Ed. London: Lippincott; 1989:559-583.

Kumar V, Rodrigues G, Ravi C. A comparative analysis on various techniques of incisional hernia repair dexperience from a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Indian J Surg. 2012;75:1-3.

Venclauskas L, Maleckas A, Kiudelis M. One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study. Hernia 2010;14:575-82.

Weber G, Baracs J, Horvath OP. Onlay mesh provides significantly better results than sublay reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh-results of a five-years follow-up. Magy Seb. 2010;63(5):302-311.

Abdollahi A, Maddah GH, Mehrabi BM. Prosthetic incisional hernioplasty: clinical experience with 354 cases. Hernia. 2010;14:569-73.

Kharde K, Dogra BB, Panchabhai S, Rana KV, Sridharan S, Kalyan S. A comparative study of onlay and retrorectus mesh placement in incisional hernia repair. Med J Dr. DY Patil Vidyapeeth. 2013 Jul 1;6(3):258.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles