Evaluation of the use of subcutaneous drains to prevent wound complications in abdominal surgeries

G. V. Manoharan; T. Sivakumar; M. Ashok Kumar

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181112

Authors

G. V. Manoharan Department of General Surgery, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
T. Sivakumar Department of General Surgery, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
M. Ashok Kumar Department of General Surgery, Government Stanley Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20181112

Keywords:

SSI, Suction drain, Wound dehiscence, Wound infection

Abstract

Background: Wound complications like surgical site infections (SSI) and wound dehiscence are common following abdominal surgery for peritonitis. Drains have been used to remove collections from the early days of surgery. The use of drains to remove subcutaneous collections to prevent wound complications needs to be studied.

Methods: Sixty patients who underwent surgery for peritonitis were selected for the study. 30 patients underwent conventional abdominal wall closure while the other 30 had suction drains inserted in the subcutaneous tissue. Wounds were observed for complications and time for healing.

Results: The incidence of SSI was significantly less in Group A (23%) than in Group B (60%). Similarly, wound dehiscence occurred in 43% of SSI cases in Group A as against 89% of SSI cases in Group B, the difference of which was statistically significant. The mean duration of hospital stay was significantly less when subcutaneous suction drain was placed (9 days).

Conclusions: Subcutaneous suction drainage tube is an effective method of abdominal wall closure in cases of peritonitis when compared to conventional primary skin closure as it significantly reduces the incidence of SSI, wound dehiscence, wound secondary suturing and duration of hospital stay.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Vashist M, Singla A, Malik V, Verma M. Abdominal wall closure in the presence of sepsis: role of negative suction. Internet J Surg. 2013;29(1):5.

Fujii T, Tabe Y, Yajima R, Yamaguchi S, Tsutsumi S, Asao T, et al. Effects of subcutaneous drain for the prevention of incisional SSI in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26(9):1151-5.

Sumi Y, Yamashita K, Kanemitsu K, Kanaji S, Yamamoto M, Imanishi T, et al. Effects of subcutaneous closed suction drain for the prevention of incisional SSI in patients with colorectal perforation. Surg Sci. 2014;05(03):122-7.

Cruse P. A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg. 1973;107(2):206.

Chowdri N, Qadri S, Parray F, Gagloo M. Role of subcutaneous drains in obese patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy: a cohort study. Int J Surg. 2007;5(6):404-7.

Kim Y, Cho S, Kim R. Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthopaedics Related Res. 1998;347:188-93.

Gallup D, Gallup D, Nolan T, Smith R, Messing M, Kline K. Use of a subcutaneous closed drainage system and antibiotics in obese gynecologic patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(2):358-62.

Cardosi R, Drake J, Holmes S, Tebes S, Hoffman M, Fiorica J, et al. Subcutaneous management of vertical incisions with 3 or more centimetres of subcutaneous fat. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(2):607-14.

Zhen Z, Lai E, Lee Q, Chen H, Lau W, Wang F. Conventional wound management versus a closed suction irrigation method for infected laparotomy wound: a comparative study. Int J Surg. 2011;9(5):378-81.