A study of prostatic fossa packing: a modified technique in Freyer’s prostatectomy for achieving hemostasis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180379Keywords:
Benign prostatic hypertrophy, Complications, Hemorrhage, Supra-pubic prostatectomyAbstract
Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is one of the most common old age related benign tumor of urinary tract of men. Though now a day the gold standard treatment is only TURP, but this facility is still out of reach for majority of rural population of India. The rate of complications has come down heavily but still complete hemostasis remains a major concern for these patients.
Methods: This present study was conducted at the center from March 2014 to December 2016, the aim of present study was to see the effectiveness of bladder packing on blood loss, complications and comfort of patient in the cases of Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) admitted at in patient department of surgery.
Results: A Total of 90 cases of BPH (Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy) were operated by Freyer’s suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy. All the patients presented with symptoms of BPH. A detailed clinical history and examination of all patients was recorded and AUA (American Urological Association), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was calculated. On table clear urine was confirmed with naked eyes and no Foley’s traction was given. After 72 hours of the surgery, pack was removed, saline irrigation was continued for 5 days. The patient was discharged on the 8th post-operative day after removal of stitches.
Conclusions: The prostatic fossa packing technique without any traction is effective in control of postoperative bleed, it is an acceptable option where transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) is not available.
Metrics
References
Presti JC. Neoplasms of the prostate gland. In: Tanagho EA, McAnnich JW, editors. Smith's general Urology. International Ed. McGraw-Hill: 2000:399-442.
Schatzl G, Madersbacher S, Djavan B. Two-year results of transurethral resection of the prostate versus four “less invasive” treatment options. Eur Urol. 2000;37:695-701.
Wang W, Guo Y, Zhang D, Tian Y, Zhang X. The prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in mainland China: evidence from epidemiological surveys. Scientific reports. 2015;5.
Goh HJ, Kim SA, Nam JW, Choi BY, Moon HS. Community-based research on the benign prostatic hyperplasia prevalence rate in Korean rural area. Korean J Urol. 2015;56(1):68-75.
Huh JS, Kim YJ, Kim SD. Prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia on Jeju Island: analysis from a cross-sectional community-based survey. World J Men Health. 2012 Aug 1;30(2):131-7.
Shahapurkar VV, Khare N, Deshmukh AV. Modified technique in Freyer's prostatectomy to achieve hemostasis. Indian J Urol. 2009;25(3):332.
Stutzman RE, Walsh PC. In: Suprapubic and retropubik prostatectomy. 6th Ed. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED Jr, editors. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co; 1992:2851-2856.
Meier DE, Tarpley JL, Obioha O. The outcome of suprapubic prostatectomy: A contemporary series in the developing world. Urol. 1995;46:40-4.
Naninga JB, Vicent J. O'Conor Suprapubic prostactomy: A review. J Urol. 1972;108:453-4.
Shaheen A, Quinlan D. Feasibility of open simple prostatectomy with early vascular control. BJU Int. 2004;93:349-52.
Moon HJ, Kim CK, Yoon JB. Clinical study of prostatectomy. Korean J Urol. 1970;2:57-62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
