VAAFT versus fistulectomy in the management of anorectal fistulae: a comparative study?

Authors

  • Mahidhar Reddy Venkatapuram Department of General Surgery, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Sreeram Sateesh Department of General Surgery, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175153

Keywords:

Anorectal fistulae, Fistula-in-ano, Fistulectomy, Video assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT), Visual analogue scale (VAS)

Abstract

Background: Among the perianal diseases Fistula in ano is a very common condition bringing lot of discomfort to the patient with a high rate of recurrence as well. Conventionally fistulectomy has been the treatment of choice for fistula-in-ano. But the procedure is associated with lot of recurrence, morbidity and sphincter incontinence. Among several recent procedures VAAFT-video assisted anal fistula treatment is gaining popularity. So, we conducted this study to know the effectiveness of VAAFT over conventional fistulectomy.

Methods: This prospective comparative study was undertaken to compare VAAFT and fistulectomy in the management of fistula-in-ano. A one-year study was carried out on 50 patients from mid-2015 to 2016. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess pain in the postoperative period. All patients were observed for one-year period for any recurrence of disease. Results were statistically analysed by SPSS 15.0 software.

Results: two groups were formed among the 50 patients selected for study. There was male preponderance in both the groups. majority of patients belonged to 31-40 years of age group. Majority of the patients had low anal fistulae followed by patients with high anal fistulae and anorectal fistulae in that order. There was recurrence of disease in 12% of people operated by fistulectomy whereas it was only 1% in group who underwent VAAFT.

Conclusions: VAAFT procedure offered significantly less recurrence rates in comparison with fistulectomy. There was less postoperative pain and nil complications after surgery. Patient satisfaction was high. Our study concluded VAAFT as a safe and effective procedure alternative to conventional fistulectomy.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Keighley MRB, Williams NS. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 3rd Edition. London: W. B. Saunders company Ltd, 1993.

Kronborg O. To lay open or excise a fistula‐inano: a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1985;72(12):970.

Buchanan GN, Bartram CI, Phillips RK, Gould SW, Halligan S, Rockall TA, et al. Efficacy of fibrin sealant in the management of complex anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(9):1167-74.

Meinero P, Mori L. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol. 2011;15(4):417-22.

Farquahasan EL. Operations in rectum and anal canal: Fistula-in-ano. In: Rintoul HF, editor. Textbook of operative surgery. 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1971:732-733.

García-Aguilar J, Davey CS, Le CT, Lowry AC, Rothenberger DA. Patient satisfaction after surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(9):1206-12.

Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13(4):227-36.

Williams JG, Farrands PA, Williams AB, Taylor BA, Lunniss PJ, et al. The treatment of anal fistula: ACPGBI position statement. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(4):18-50.

Malik AI, Nelson RL. Surgical management of anal fistulae: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(5):420-30.

Grolich T, Skricka T, Robek O, Kala Z, Hemmelová B, Hrivnák R. Role of Video Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment in our management of fistula-in-ano. Acta Chirurgica Iugoslavica. 2014;61(2):83-5.

Schwandner O. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) combined with advancement flap repair in Crohn’s disease. Tech Coloproctology. 2013;17(2):221-5. [PubMed]

Walega P, Romaniszyn M, Nowak W. VAAFT: a new minimally invasive method in the diagnostics and treatment of anal fistulas - initial results. Pol Przegl Chir. 2014;86:7-10. [PubMed]

Mendes C, Ferriera L, Sapocaia R, Lima M, Araujo S. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment: technical considerations and preliminary results of the first Brazilian experience. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27(1):77-81. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Bubbers EJ, Cologne KG. Management of complex anal fistulas. Clinics in Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;2991):43-9.

Steele SR, Kumar R, Feingold DL, Rafferty JL, Buie WD. Practice parameters for the management of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano. Dise Colon Rectum. 2011;54(12):1465-74.

Dudukgian H, Abcarian H. Why do we have so much trouble treating anal fistula?. WJG. 2011;17(28):3292-6.

Wałęga P, Romaniszyn M, Nowak W. VAAFT: a new minimally invasive method in the diagnostics and treatment of anal fistulas-initial results. Polish J Surg. 2014;86(1):7-10.

Garcia‐Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong W, Goldberg DW, Madoff RD. Cutting seton versus two‐stage seton fistulotomy in the surgical management of high anal fistula. Br J Surg. 1998;85(2):243-5.

Mohite JD, Gawai RS, Rohondia OS, Bapat RD. K-sharsootra (medicated seton) treatment for fistula-in-ano. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1997;16(3):96-7.

Chowbey PK, Khullar R, Sharma A, Soni V, Najma K, Baijal M. Minimally invasive anal fistula treatment (MAFT)- an appraisal of early results in 416 patients. Indian J Surg. 2015;77(2):716-21.

Herold A, Ommer A, Fürst A, Pakravan F, Hahnloser D, Strittmatter B, et al. Results of the Gore Bio-A fistula plug implantation in the treatment of anal fistula: a multicentre study. Techniques in Coloproctol. 2016;20(8):585-90.

Wallin UG, Mellgren AF, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM. Does ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract raise the bar in fistula surgery?. Dise Colon Rectum. 2012;55(11):1173-8.

Shanwani A, Nor AM, Amri N. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter-saving technique for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 201;53(1):39-42.

Lange EO, Ferrari L, Krane M, Fichera A. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract: a sphincter-sparing option for complex fistula-in-ano. J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2016;20(2):439-44.

Seow-En I, Seow-Choen F, Koh PK. An experience with video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) with new insights into the treatment of anal fistulae. Techniques Coloproctol. 2016;20(6):389-93.

Kochhar G, Saha S, Andley M, Kumar A, Saurabh G, Pusuluri R, Bhise V, Kumar A. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment. JSLS. 2014;18(3).

Liu H, Xiao Y, Zhang Y, Pan Z, Peng J, Tang W, et al. Preliminary efficacy of video-assisted anal fistula treatment for complex anal fistula. Chinese J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2015;18(12):1207-10.

Parks AG, Stitz RW. The treatment of high fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 1976;19(6):487-99.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-25

How to Cite

Venkatapuram, M. R., & Sateesh, S. (2017). VAAFT versus fistulectomy in the management of anorectal fistulae: a comparative study?. International Surgery Journal, 4(12), 3895–3898. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175153

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles