Ergonomics in laparoscopy: a questionnaire survey of physical discomfort and symptoms in surgeons following laparoscopic surgery

Madhu Shankar K. C.; Manjunath K.; Rohit Krishnappa

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175151

Authors

Madhu Shankar K. C. Department of General Surgery, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Manjunath K. Department of General Surgery, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Rohit Krishnappa Department of General Surgery, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175151

Keywords:

Ergonomics, Laparoscopy, Physical discomforts

Abstract

Background: The prolonged and frequent use of laparoscopic equipment raises ergonomic risks that may cause physical distress for surgeons. We aimed to assess the prevalence of laparoscopic surgeons’ physical distress associated with ergonomic problems in the operating room (OR) and their awareness of the ergonomic guidelines in laparoscopy.

Methods: A sample of 150 laparoscopic surgeons was assessed using a questionnaire on demographic information, ergonomic issues in the OR, musculoskeletal symptoms, and awareness of the ergonomic guidelines for the OR.

Results: There were 112 survey respondents (74.3%) with valid questionnaires. Among the respondents 50% had completed laparoscopic training programs while 39.2% had no laparoscopic training. 61.5% respondents placed the operating table at umbilicus height during the actual operation. The majority of the respondents used only one monitor during the procedure. Only 4.3% placed the monitor below the eye level. 3% of the respondents attributed pain due to foot pedal design. The respondents experienced discomfort in the following regions in descending order: right shoulder (87.2%), left shoulder (78.3%), neck (67.4%), back (46.8%), hand (30.3%), leg (21.6%), and wrist (15.8%). The respondents with more than 5yrs of experience complained less discomfort than those with less than 5yrs. Only 54.6% of respondents were aware of the ergonomic guidelines. However, almost all of the respondents (100%) regarded the ergonomic guidelines to be important in the OR.

Conclusions: Most of the laparoscopic surgeons were not aware of the ergonomic guidelines for the laproscopic OR; especially, junior laparoscopic surgeons and surgeons with <5 years of laparoscopic surgical experience were more affected. They have been suffering from varying degrees of physical discomfort caused by ergonomic issues. There is an urgent need for education regarding ergonomic guidelines in the OR for laparoscopic surgeons.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Miller K, Benden M, Pickens A, Shipp E, Zheng Q. Ergonomics principles associated with laparoscopic surgeon injury/illness. Hum Factors. 2012;54:1087-92.

Wauben LS, Van Veelen MA, Gossot D, Goossens RH. Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Surgical Endoscopy Other Interventional Techniques. 2006;20(8):1268-74.

Berguer R, Smith W. An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res. 2006;134:87-92.

Veelen V, Kazemier J. Improved physical ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2004;13:161-6.

Stylopoulos N, Rattner D. Robotics and ergonomics. SCNA. 2003;83:1321-37. [PubMed]

van Veelen MA, Meijer DW, Uijttewaal I, Goossens RH, Snijders CJ, et al. Improvement of the laparoscopic needle holder based on new ergonomic guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:699-703.

Hanson DL. Evaluation of the Hawthorne effect on physical education research. Res Q. 1967;38:723-4. [PubMed]

Van Det MJ, Meijerink WJ, Hoff C, Totte ER, Pierie JP. Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surgical Endoscopy. 2009;23(6):1279-85.

Manasnayakorn S, Cuschieri A, Hanna GB. Ergonomic assessment of optimum operating table height for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:783-9.

van Veelen, Meijer DW, Goossens RH, Snijders CJ. New ergonomic design criteria for handles of laparoscopic dissection forceps. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2001;11:17-26.

Sari V, Nieboer TE, Vierhout ME, Stegeman DF, Kluivers KB. The operation room as a hostile environment for surgeons: physical complaints during and after laparoscopy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19:105-9.

Hemal AK, Srinivas M, Charles AR. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. J Endourol. 2001;15:499-503.

Uhrich ML, Underwood RA, Standeven JW, Soper NJ, Engsberg JR. Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:635-9.

Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD. Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:466-8.

van Veelen MA, Kazemier G, Koopman J, Goossens RH, Meijer DW. Assessment of the ergonomically optimal operating surface height for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2002;12:47-52.

van Veelen MA, Snijders CJ, van Leeuwen E, Goossens RH, Kazemier G. Improvement of foot pedals used during surgery based on new ergonomic guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1086-91.

Bagrodia A, Raman JD. Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques. J Endourol. 2009;23:627-33.

Xiao DJ, Jakimowicz JJ, Albayrak A, Goossens RH. Ergonomic factors on task performance in laparoscopic surgery training. Appl Ergon. 2012;43:548-53.