DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175903

Incidence, clinical manifestations and outcome of TUR (transurethral resection) syndrome in patients undergoing TURP under spinal anaesthesia: results from clinical observations in a cohort of 50 patients at a tertiary care centre in North India

Christina George, Parvez David Haque, Kim J. Mammen

Abstract


Background: ‘TUR syndrome’ is clinically detectable in 2% of patients undergoing an otherwise safe operation. Currently, spinal anaesthesia is the most widely anaesthetic technique for TURP as it is easier to detect signs of TUR syndrome in an awake patient. This study aimed at looking at the clinical spectrum and outcomes of TUR syndrome in patients undergoing TURP under spinal anaesthesia.

Methods: This clinical study was conducted over a period of 6 months in the departments of anesthesiology and urology at the Christian medical college and hospital Ludhiana in a cohort of 50 male patients electively admitted for TURP under spinal block belonging to ASA I or II groups. Patients received intermittent irrigation with 1.5% glycine, and monitored for TUR symptoms and electrolyte estimations perioperatively.

Results: In our study the incidence of TURP syndrome was 10 %. Under spinal block clinical manifestations along with serum sodium values monitored perioperatively helped diagnose and manage the patients. All patients successfully completed resection, with no mortality related to TURP syndrome.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate under spinal anaesthesia, monitoring clinical symptoms for the rare TURP syndrome and additional serum sodium levels act as an adjunct in diagnosis. In both situations diagnosis and early intervention prevents extreme neurological symptoms and reduces mortality.


Keywords


Spinal anesthesia, TURP (Transurethral resection of prostate), TUR (transurethral resection) syndrome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Okeke AA, Lodge R, Hinchliffe A, Walker A, Dickerson D, Gillatt DA. Ethanol-glycine irrigating fluid for transurethral resection of the prostate in practice. Br J Urol. 2000;86:43-6.

McGowan-Smyth S, Vasdev N, Gowrie-Mohan S. Spinal anesthesia facilitates the early recognition of TUR syndrome. Current Urol. 2016;9(2):57-61.

O’Donnell AM. Anaesthesia for transurethral resection of the prostate. Continuing Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2009;9:92-6.

Gravenstein D. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) syndrome: a review of the pathophysiology and management. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:438-46.

Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT, Peters PC. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications: operative study 13 participating institutions evaluating 3885 patients. J Urol. 1989;142:243-7.

Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of prostate (TURP)-incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006;50:969-80.

Rao PN. Fluid absorption during urological endoscopy. Br J Urol. 1987;60:93-9.

Clemente RL, Ramasco RF, Platas SA, Archilla EJ, Romero CI, Corbacho FC, et al. Reabsorption syndrome after transurethral resection (TUR) of the prostate: review of physiologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic features. Actas Urol Esp. 2001;25:14-31.

Gray RA, Lynch C, Hehir M, Worsley M. Intravesical pressure and the TUR syndrome. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:461-5.

Hahn RG. The volumetric fluid balance as a measure of fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000;17:559-65.

Hahn RG, Essén P. ECG and cardiac enzymes after glycine absorption in transurethral prostatic resection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38:550-6.

Demirel I, Ozer AB, Bayar MK, Erhan OL. TURP syndrome and severe hyponatremia under general anaesthesia. BMJ Case Reports; 2012.