DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175890

A comparative study of three-dimensional mesh (3D mesh) and polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs in adults

Tajamul Rashid, Farooq Ahmad Reshi, Iqbal Saleem Mir, Suhail Nazir Bhat, Irfan Nazir, Sheikh Viqar, Mudasir Farooq Hajini, Aftab Akbar

Abstract


Background: Polypropylene mesh gives risk of recurrence, owing to overall decrease in the size of mesh and increased subjective foreign body feeling from contracture and scarring. An anatomically contoured 3D mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair often requires no fixation, with minimal risk of postoperative pain and recurrence rate.

Methods: This was a prospective comparative study conducted over a period of 2.5 years. The study enrolled 60 patients, 30 patients in each group. The end points of the study were mesh fixation time, post-operative pain, seroma formation, hospital stay, chronic groin pain, sensory impairment, and cost and affordability. Follow up period was 18 months.

Results: The mesh fixation time was less in 3D mesh, 10.6±4.31 minutes (p value- 0.0002). The incidence of severe immediate postoperative pain was higher in polypropylene mesh 10% (p value of 0.612). The postoperative seroma was less in 3D mesh, 3.3% (p value of 1.00). The mean hospital stay was shorter in 3D, 1.7±0.69 days (p value–0.005). Postoperative sensory impairment was more in polypropylene mesh, 6.6% (p value-1.00). The incidence of chronic groin pain was less in 3D (p value- 0.612). We found a higher recurrence rate at 18 months in both groups (p-value-1.00).

Conclusions: The use of three-dimensional mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is a safe and viable option. It offers many advantages in terms of less fixation time, shorter hospital stays, decreased chronic groin pain and morbidity. Elimination of tacks and shorter hospital stay may reduce the cost of 3D mesh.


Keywords


Inguinal hernia, Tacks, Three-dimensional mesh

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wantz G.E. Abdominal Wall Hernias; Schwartz SI, ed. Principles of Surgery: 7th Ed. New York, NY: Mc Graw Hill; 1999:1585-1611.

McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Roberts A, Withers H. Evidence-based management of groin hernia in primary care- a systematic review. Family Practice. 2000;17(5):442-7.

Bax T, Sheppard BC, Crass RA. Surgical options in the management of groin hernias. American family physician. 1999;59:143-58.

Gilbert AI, Young J, Graham MF, Divilio LT, Patel B. Combined anterior and posterior inguinal hernia repair: intermediate recurrence rates with three groups of surgeons. Hernia. 2004;8(3):203-7.

Ger R. The Management of certain abdominal hernias by intra-abdominal closure of the neck. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1982;64;342-4.

Kingsnorth A, Wright D, Porter C, Robertson G. Prolene Hernia System compared with Lichtenstein patch: a randomised double-blind study of short-term and medium-term outcomes in primary inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2002;6(3):113-9.

Ferzli G, Sayad P, Huie F, Hallak A, Usal H. Endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy. Surgical endoscopy. 1998;12(11):1311-3.

Usher F. Hernia Repair with Marlex Mesh Arch. Surg. 1962;84:325-8.

Doctor HG. Evolution and Evaluation of Newer Prosthetic Material: Recent Advances in Surgery. 2009(11): 207-224.

Welty G, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Kasperk R, Schumpelick V. Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes. Hernia. 2001;5(3):142-7.

Pajotin P. Laparoscopic groin hernia repair using a curved prosthesis without fixation. Le journal de Coelio-Chirurgie. 1998;28:64-8..

Koch CA, Greenlee SM, Larson DR, Harrington JR, Farley DR. Randomized prospective study of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2006;10(4):457.

Vrijland WW, van Den Tol MP, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Busschbach JJ, De Lange DC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of non‐mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia. British Journal of Surgery. 2002;89(3):293-7.

Eriksen JR, Gögenur I, Rosenberg J. Choice of mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia. 2007;11(6):481-92.

Champault G, Bernard C, Rizk N, Polliand C. Inguinal hernia repair: the choice of prosthesis outweighs that of technique. Hernia. 2007;11(2):125-8.

Shah BC, Goede MR, Bayer R, Buettner SL, Putney SJ, McBride CL, Oleynikov D. Does type of mesh used have an impact on outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia?. The American Journal of Surgery. 2009;198(6):759-64.

Sajid MS, Kalra L, Parampalli U, Sains PS, Baig MK. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of lightweight mesh against heavyweight mesh in influencing the incidence of chronic groin pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The American Journal of Surgery. 2013;205(6):726-36.

Bell RC, Price JG. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using an anatomically contoured three-dimensional mesh. Surgical Endoscopy and other Interventional Techniques. 2003 Nov 1;17(11):1784-8.

Bangash A, Khan N, Sadiq M. Composite polypropylene mesh versus lightweight polypropylene mesh: The TAPP repair for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Journal of the Scientific Society. 2012;39(2):64.

Chalkoo M, Mir MA, Makhdoomi H. Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Mesh Hernioplasty: A Medical College Experience. Surgical Science. 2016;7(02):107.

Mir IS, Nafae AA, Malyar AA, Nafae M, Watali Y, Farooq M, et al. An Experience of Short-Term Results of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty Using 3D Mesh in a Developing Country. International Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2015 Jan 8;6(01):64.

Paajanen H. Do absorbable mesh sutures cause less chronic pain than non-absorbable sutures after Lichtenstein inguinal herniorraphy? Hernia. 2002;6:117-20.

Ayiomamitis, Georgios D, Zaravinos. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy and percutaneous techniques. 2013;(23):150-5.

Brügger L, Bloesch M, Ipaktchi R, Kurmann A, Candinas D, Beldi G. Objective hypoesthesia and pain after transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study comparing tissue adhesive versus spiral tacks. Surgical endoscopy. 2012;26(4):1079-85.

Bowne WB, Morgenthal CB, Castro AE, Shah P, Ferzli GS. The role of endoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy: where do we stand in 2005? Surg Endosc. 2007;21(5):707-12.

Schmedt C-G, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:188-99.

Bittner R, Sauerland S, Schmedt CG. Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open non-mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:605-15.

Chowbey PK, Garg N, Sharma A, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):3073-9.

Agarwal BB, Agarwal KA, Mahajan KC. Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy and lightweight poly-propylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Surg endosc. 2009;23(2):242-7.

Khajanchee YS, Urbach DR, Swanstrom LL, Hansen PD. Outcomes of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy without fixation of mesh to the abdominal wall. Surg endosc. 2001;15(10):1102-7.

Carter J, Duh QY. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias. World J Surg. 2011;35(7):1519-25.