A prospective study of cases of intestinal obstruction and role of conservative expectant management

Authors

  • Yuktansh Pandey Department of Surgery, RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20182220

Keywords:

Acute obstruction, sub-acute obstruction, Conservative management of obstruction, Non-conservative management of intestinal obstruction

Abstract

Background: Intestinal obstruction continues to be a common surgical emergency throughout the world and its management protocol has evolved over years.  In our study we aimed to provide a complete epidemiological description of intestinal obstruction in adult age group patients in a tertiary care hospital in Northern India.

Methods: This is a prospective study of patients belonging to age group more than 12 years admitted in our unit with clinical features suggestive of intestinal obstruction from September 2011 to December 2013 at R. N. T. Medical College, Udaipur. The study comprised of 134 patients.

Results: Intestinal obstruction contributed to 6.5% of all surgical admissions. It was nearly twice more common in males. 43% patients presented with features of acute intestinal obstruction in comparison to 57% who presented with features of sub-acute intestinal obstruction. Most common cause observed was obstruction due to intra-abdominal adhesions followed by abdominal tuberculosis 48 and 29 percent respectively. Features of intestinal obstruction resolved in 60% patients with conservative management. Adhesions, abdominal tuberculosis and malignancy counted for majority of patients with sub-acute obstruction.  Emergency surgery was done in 32% of patients and 36.5 % of patients were discharged non-operatively. Planned Surgery after successful expectant management was done in 24 % patients. Most frequently seen complication was wound site collection (72.5%) followed by respiratory tract infections (49%). Total mortality in our study was 12.6% of which 41% was post-operative mortality and 59% mortality seen in patients who expired during conservative management.   

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that intra-abdominal adhesions and abdominal tuberculosis account for most cases of intestinal obstruction in countries like India. A watchful expectant management can be tried in patients with prior operative history and those with history of tuberculosis.

References

Hill AG. The management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: an update. Int J Surg. 2008;6(1):77-80.

Jeong WK, Lim SB, Choi HS. Conservative management of adhesive small bowel obstructions in patients previously operated on for primary colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(5):926-32.

Attard JA, MacLean AR. Adhesive small bowel obstruction: epidemiology, biology and prevention. Can J Surg. 2007;50(4):291-300.

Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions-how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72(1):60-3.

Markogiannakis H, Messaris E, Dardamanis D, Pararas N, Tzertzemelis D, Giannopoulos P, et al. Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: clinical presentation, etiology, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(3):432.

Jackson PG, Raiji MT. Evaluation and management of intestinal obstruction. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83(2):159-65.

Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Galati M, Smerieri N, Biffl WL, Ansaloni L, et al. Bologna guidelines for diagnosis and management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO): 2013 update of the evidence-based guidelines from the world society of emergency surgery ASBO working group. World J Emerg Surg. 2013;8(1):42.

Gill SS, Eggleston FC. Acute intestinal obstruction Arch Surg. 1965;91:389-92.

Playforth RH, Holloway JB, Griffen Jr WO. Mechanical small bowel obstruction: a plea for earlier surgical intervention. Ann Surg. 1970;171(5):783.

Adhikari S, Hossein MZ, Das A, Mitra N, Ray U. Etiology and outcome of acute intestinal obstruction: a review of 367 patients in Eastern India. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(4):285-7.

Budharaja SN, Govindarajalu S, Perianayagum WJ. Acute intestinal obstruction in Pondicherry. IJS. 1976:111-7.

Fuzan M, Kaymake E, Harmancioglu O, Astarcioglu K. Principal causes of mechanical bowel obstruction in surgically treated adults in Western Turkey. BJS. 1991;78:202-03.

Iwvagwu O, Deans GT. Small bowel volvulus. J Coll Surg EDINS. 1999;44:150-5.

Rocha FG, Theman TA, Matros E, Ledbetter SM, Zinner MJ, Ferzoco SJ. Nonoperative management of patients with a diagnosis of high-grade small bowel obstruction by computed tomography. Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1000-4.

Schwab DP, Blackhurst DW, Sticca RP. Operative acute small bowel obstruction: admitting service impacts outcome. Am Surg. 2001;67(11):1034-8.

Williams SB, Greenspon J, Young HA, Orkin BA. Small bowel obstruction: conservative versus surgical management. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(6):1140-6.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles