A prospective randomized controlled study: early enteral nutrition following gastrointestinal surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20174107Keywords:
Anastomosis, Enteral, GroupsAbstract
Background: The word anastomosis originates from the Greek word (ἀναστόμωσις) meaning communicating opening. Gut anastomosis is one of the frequently performed surgeries in both emergency and elective setup. Anastomosis following gut resections in emergency set up is mostly done due to traumatic rupture, benign or malignant perforation or obstruction and in certain other inflammatory conditions. Anastomosis is also done in some elective conditions like mostly due to malignancy of GI system. As conventional practice following gut anastomosis, patients are kept “NIL BY MOUTH” till bowel sounds return.
Methods: It’s a prospective study, carried out over period of 18 months in Department of General Surgery, Sri Guru Ramdas Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vallah, Amritar. The objective of this study was to whether early enteral feeding within 48 hours of small gut anastomosis is tolerable to the patient. Whether early enteral feeding within 48 hours of small gut anastomosis is beneficial to the patient.
Results: This prospectively conducted comparative study was carried out on 60 patients, meeting inclusion criteria, undergoing gastrointestinal anastomosis either elective or emergency, in the Department of General Surgery, SGRD Medical College, between Jan 2012 to June 2013. Random selection of patients into group A (30) and group B (30) was done after having fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. The group A was fed via enteral route within 48 hrs of enteric anastomosis. The group B was fed via enteral route after 48-72 hours or appearance of full peristaltic sounds following enteric anastomosis. These patients were followed in post-operative period for their drain output, any nausea, vomiting, or significant abdominal distension, prolonged ileus, clinical leakage, infective complications, hospital stay.
Conclusions: The following inferences can therefore be drawn from this study: Appearance of intestinal peristaltic sounds is earlier in early enterally fed group, Mean duration of post-operative hospital stay is lower in early enterally fed group, mean post-operative day 4 albumin level is higher in early enterally fed group. The rate of infective complications (UTI, RTI, wound complications) is equal in both the groups. The rate of clinical leakage, nausea/vomiting are equal in both the groups. The rate of re-exploration for anastomotic leakage is equal in both the groups.
Metrics
References
Wood JH, Erickson LW, Condon RE. Postoperative Ileus: a colonic problem? Surg. 1978;84:527-33.
Catchpole BN. Smooth muscle and the surgeon. Aust N Z J Surg. 1989;59:199-208.
Irvin TT, Hunt TK. Effect of malnutrition on colonic healing. Ann Surg. 1974;180:765-72.
Ward MW, Danzi M, Lewin MR, Rennie MJ, Clark CG. The effects of subclinical malnutrition and refeeding on the healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1982;69:308-10.
Goodlad RA, Al-Mukhtar MY, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Wright NA. Cell proliferation, plasma enteroglucagon and plasma gastrin levels in starved and refed rats. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1983;43:55-62.
Moss G. Maintenance of gastrointestinal function after bowel surgery and immediate enteral full nutrition. II. Clinical experience, with objective demonstration of intestinal absorption and motility. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1981;5:215-20.
McCarter MD, Gomez ME, Daly JM. Early postoperative enteral feeding following major upper gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 1996;1:278-85.
Uden P, Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Impact of long-term relative bowel rest on conditions for colonic surgery. Am J Surg. 1988;156:381-5.
Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA. Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ. 2001;323:773-6.
Moore FA, Feliciano DV, Andrassy RJ. Early enteral feeding compared with parentral reduces postoperative septic complications: the results of a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 1992;216:172-83.
Hoover HC, Ryan JA, Anderson EJ, Fischer JE. Nutritional benefits of immediate postoperative jejunal feeding of an elemental diet. Am J Surg. 1980;139:153-9.
Moore EE, Moore FA. Immediate enteral nutrition following multisystem trauma. J Am Coll Nutr. 1991;10:633-48.
Delany HM, Demetriore AA, Teh E, Che BS, Levenson SM. Effect of early postoperative nutritional support on skin wound and colon anastomosis healing. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 1990;14:357-61.
Kalinina TV. The use of the apparatuses PKS 25 and SK in the Clinic. In Mechanical Sutures in Surgery of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Moscow. 1964.
Deans FN. New process for the healing of intestinal wounds. Received by the Royal Society of Medicine of Marseille. Imprimerie D’Archard, Tome I. 827:127-31.
Murphy JB. Cholecysto-intestinal, gastro-intestinal, entero-intestinal anastomosis and approximation without sutures. Med Rec. 1892:42:665-76.
Hültl H. II Congress of the Hungarian Society of Surgery. Budapest; 1908.