Preoperative predictive factors for difficult laparoscopic appendectomy

Authors

  • Anubhav Goel Department of Surgery, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Ankur Bansal Department of Surgery, S. R. Hospital, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Anil Baliyan Department of Surgery, Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20174522

Keywords:

Difficult appendectomy, Laparoscopic appendectomy, Predictors

Abstract

Background: An appendectomy is the surgical removal of the appendix. Appendectomy may be performed laparoscopically or as an open operation. Laparoscopy is now often used as patient resumed normal activity within a shorter period than had been experienced with open appendectomy. Patients had a superior cosmetic result and experienced significantly less postoperative discomfort. In this study, we attempted to determine the predictors for difficult appendectomy using history and clinical examinations, preoperative laboratory data, ultrasonography findings and intraoperative finding.

Methods: The study was conducted in Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra. All patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from 1st January 2016 to 30th June 2017 were included in the study. A detailed performa was developed to record information regarding patient history, physical examination, laboratory parameters, ultrasonography (USG) findings and intra-operative details. Laparoscopic appendectomy done in more than 120 minutes, converted into open due to difficulty in surgery and not due to complications, severe adhesions were considered to be a case of difficult appendectomy.

Results: We found that the difficult laparoscopic appendectomy can be predicted preoperatively based on age >60 years, history of previous lower abdominal surgery, time of onset to surgery >24 hours, acute appendicitis and peri appendicular collection.

Conclusions: There are very few reports to determine the predictors of difficult appendectomy and more research is required to establish it.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Saye WB, Rives DA, Cochran EB. Laparoscopic appendectomy: three years' experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1991;1:109-15.

Tarnoff M, Atabek U, Goodman M, Alexander JB, Chrzanowski F, Mortman K, Camishon R, Pello M. A comparison of laparoscopic and open appendectomy. JSLS. 1998;2(2):153-8.

Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Enochsson L, Gudbjartsson T, Wenner J, Kullman E, et al. Conversion from laparoscopic to open appendicectomy: a possible drawback of the laparoscopic technique? Eur J Surg. 2001;167(3):209-13.

Ferrarese AG, Martino V, Enrico S, Falcone A, Catalano S, Pozzi G, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly: our experience. BMC Surg. 2013;13(2):S22.

Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;132(5):910-25.

Ciarrocchi A, Amicucci G. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in obese patients: a meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10(1):4-9.

Corneille MG, Steigelman MB, Myers JG, Jundt J, Dent DL, Lopez PP, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy in obese patients. Am J Surg. 2007;194:877-80

Shen Z, Ye Y, Yin M, Wang S. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis versus chronic appendicitis. J Invest Surg. 2012;25(4):209-13.

Wu JM, Lin HF, Chen KH, Tseng LM, Tsai MS, Huang SH. Impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2006;21(4):570-3.

Kim M, Kim SJ, Cho HJ. Effect of surgical timing and outcomes for appendicitis severity. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016;91(2):85-9.

Mostbeck G, Adam SJ, Nielsen MB, Claudon M, Clevert D, Nicolau C, et al. How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first. Insights Imaging. 2016;7(2):255-63.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-27

How to Cite

Goel, A., Bansal, A., & Baliyan, A. (2017). Preoperative predictive factors for difficult laparoscopic appendectomy. International Surgery Journal, 4(10), 3488–3491. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20174522

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles