Simultaneous surgery for primary and nodes in carcinoma penis: a rural tertiary medical centre experience and results

Authors

  • Senthil Kumar A. C. Department of Surgical Oncology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Rajesh S. Department of General Surgery, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20174517

Keywords:

Carcinoma, Dissection, Nodes, Primary, Prophylactic, Therapeutic

Abstract

Background: Historically surgery for nodes in carcinoma penis was done as staged procedure due to fear of higher morbidity and longer hospital stay. However, in view of the established safety of the simultaneous procedure, very few centres do simultaneous surgery for nodes and primary in cancer penis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of all the simultaneous surgeries for nodes and primary for carcinoma penis done at our hospital, during the period April 2015 to March 2017 were done and various parameters were calculated and compared with historical standards of various series.

Results: The various parameters namely wound morbidity, hospital stay and complications were analysed and compared with historical standards. A total of 15 patients during the above mentioned were found to be suitable for the analysis after having excluded patients who had previous therapy and inoperable tumours. The mean follows up period was 12 months (ranging from 8 to 20 months). The mean hospital stay was 15 days (range from 12 days to 25 days). The skin margin necrosis rate was 6.67%, wound infection rate was 6.67% and there were no perioperative deaths. The same was compared with historical standards.

Conclusions: Simultaneous surgery for primary and nodes in carcinoma penis is safe and the standard results are reproducible in a rural tertiary medical centre like ours.

References

Horenblas S, Graafland NM. Lymph nodal status as a prognostic factor in carcinoma penis. Eu Urol Review. 2009;4(1):31-4.

Nelson BA, Cookson MS, Smith JA, Chanc SS. Department of Urologic surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical centre, Nashville, Tenesse. J Urol. 2004;172: 494-97.

Spratt J. Review article on Groin dissection. J Surg Oncol. 2000;73:243-62.

McDougal WS. Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol. 1995;154:1364.

Fraley EE, Vhang G, Manivel C, Niehans GA. The role of ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy and the significance of histological differentiation in treatment of carcinoma of the penis. J Urol. 1989;142:1478.

Johnson DE, Lo RK. Management of regional lymph nodes in penile carcinoma: five-year results following therapeutic groin dissections. Urol. 1984;24:308.

Skinner DG, Leadbetter WF, Kelley SB. The surgical management of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol. 1972;107:273.

Crawford Ed, Daneshgari F. Management of regional lymphatic drainage in carcinoma of the penis. Urol Clin North Am. 1992;19:305-17.

Horenblas S. Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection. BJU Int. 2001;88:473-83.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-27

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles