BLEED: a classification tool to predict outcomes in patients with upper and lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20173212Keywords:
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage, Risk factorsAbstract
Background: Acute gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage is a common clinical problem with diverse manifestations. Such bleeding may range from trivial to massive and can originate from virtually any region of the GI tract, including the pancreas, liver, and biliary tree. Several risk scoring systems have also been proposed to classify patients into high and low risk groups for complications, like re-bleeding or mortality, based on multivariate analyses. Kollef and colleagues identified the BLEED criteria: (a) ongoing Bleeding, (b) Low systolic blood pressure (BP), (c) Elevated prothrombin time (PT), (d) Erratic mental status, and (e) unstable comorbid Disease as risk factors for complication of GIH at any time during hospitalization after an initial 24 hours of stabilization. The objective of this study was to predict outcome according to a risk stratification BLEED criterion, independent of endoscopic findings.
Methods: We studied all patients who presented with acute gastrointestinal bleeding to emergency department. patients with epistaxis, paranasal sinuses bleed, upper GI bleed secondary to endoscopic procedure, patients with chronic Anemia and those patients which admitted with Primary diagnosis other than UGIB were excluded. Patients meeting the BLEED criteria at their initial assessment were classified as high risk (66) and all others were categorized as low-risk (10). In-hospital complications were defined as recurrent UGIB, surgery to control the source of hemorrhage, hospital mortality, length of hospital stay and units of blood transfused.
Results: There were 76 patients, with mean age of 46.37 years, 56 patients (73.3%) were case of Upper gastrointestinal bleeding, 20 patients (26.7%) were case of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. 66 (86.84%) of patients were categorized as high-risk patients and 10(13.2%) of patients were categorized as low risk patients. 14(21.1%) of patients were admitted in ICU ,13 Patients had undergone surgery (17.10%), 1 (1.5%) of patient had Re bleeding, nine (13%) had died. Stastical analysis showed significant association between components like low SBP (P=0.008), elevated prothrombin time (P=0.04), erratic mental status(P=0.001) and in hospital complications. All nine deaths were found in high risk group.
Conclusions: BLEED criteria can be used as triage tool for stratifying the patients of acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage into high risk and low risk category without endoscopic findings and useful in predicting outcome in such patients and plan the treatment accordingly.
Metrics
References
Afessa B. Triage of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding for intensive care unit admission based on risk factors for poor outcome. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30:281-5.
Kollef MH, O'Brien JD, Zuckerman GR, Shannon W. BLEED: a classification tool to predict outcomes in patients with acute upper and lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1125-32.
Bordley DR, Mushlin AI, Dolan JG, Richardson WS, Barry M, Polio J, et al. Early clinical signs identify low-risk patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. JAMA. 1985;253:3282-5.
Corley DA, Stefan AM, Wolf M, Cook EF, Lee TH. Early indicators of prognosis in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:336-40.
Rapoport J, Teres D, Barnett R, Jacobs P, Shustack A, Lemeshow S, et al. A comparison of intensive care unit utilization in Alberta and western Massachusetts. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1336-46.
Salimi J, Salimzadesh A, Yazdani V. Outcome of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage according to BLEED risk classification. Baharain Med Bullet. 2007;29(1).
Saeed ZA, Ramirez FC, Hepps KS. Prospective validation of the Baylor bleeding score for predicting the likelihood of re-bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis of peptic ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:561-5.
Rockall TA, Logan RFA, Devlin HB. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut. 1996;38:316-21.
Bordley DR, Mushlin AI, Dolan JG. Early clinical signs identify low-risk patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. JAMA. 1985253:3282-5.
Schein M, Gecelter G. APACHE II score in massive upper gastro intestinal haemorrhge from peptic ulcer: prognostic value and potential clinical applications. Br J Surg. 1989;76:733-6.
Pimpl W, Boeckl O, Waclawiczek HW. Estimation of the mortality rate ofpatients with severe gastro duodenal hemorrhage with the aid of a new scoringsystem. Endoscop. 1987;19:101-6.
Clason AE, Macleod DAD, Elton RA. Clinical factors in the prediction of further hemorrhage or mortality in acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Br J Surg. 1986;73:985-7.
Morgan AG, McAdam WA, Walmsley GL. Clinical findings, early endoscopy, and multivariate analysis in patients bleeding from upper gastrointestinal tract. Br Med J. 1977;2:237-40.
Hay JA, Maldonado L, Weingarten SR, Ellrodt AG. Prospective evaluation of a clinical guideline recommending hospital length of stay in upper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage. JAMA. 1997;278:2151-6.
Lee JG, Turnipseed S, Romano PS, Vigil H, Azari R, Melnikoff N, et al. Endoscopy-based triage significantly reduces hospitalization rates and costs of treating upper GI bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Gastro intest Endosc. 1999;50:755-61.
Stoltzing H, Ohmann C, Krick M, Thon K. Diagnostic emergency endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding - do we have any decision aids for patient selection? Hepato Gastro Enterol. 1991;38:224-7.
Saeed ZA, Winchester CB, Michaletz PA, Woods KL, Graham DY. A scoring system to predict re bleeding after endoscopic therapy of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, with a comparison of heat probe and ethanol injection. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:1842-9.
Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut. 1996;38:316-21.
Bordley DR, Mushlin AI, Dolan JG, Richardson WS, Barry M, Polio J, et al. Early clinical signs identify low-risk patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. JAMA. 1985;253:3282-5.
Corley DA, Stefan AM, Wolf M, Cook EF, Lee TH. Early indicators of prognosis in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:336-40.
Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet. 2000;356:1318-21.
Strate LL, Saltzman JR, Ookubo R, Mutinga ML, Syngal S. Validation of a clinical prediction rule for severe acute lower intestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1821-7.
Das A, Ben-Menachem T, Cooper GS, Chak A, Sivak MV, Gonet JA, et al. Prediction of outcome in acute lower-gastrointestinal haemorrhage based on an artificial neural network: internal and external validation of a predictive model. Lancet. 2003;362:1261-6.
Laine L, Peterson WL. Bleeding peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:717-26.
Longstreth GF, Feitelberg SP. Outpatient care of selected patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Lancet. 1995;3345:108-11.