Two eras of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an experience of 3000 cases

Authors

  • Jahangir Sarwar Khan Department of Surgery, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Raheel Ahmad Department of Surgery, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20173871

Keywords:

Common bile duct injury, Complications, LC

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) a minimal invasive procedure is regarded as gold standard for gallstone disease for many years. With increase learning curve of surgeons, the incidence of complications of this procedure decreases significantly. The purpose of study was to compare the experiences of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed.

Methods: It was a retrospective cohort study conducted in Surgical Department, Rawalpindi Medical College and author's surgical clinic. From 1st January 1998 to 31st December 2014. Total 3000 patients of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into 2 groups. First 1500 cases (operated between January 1998 to December 2007) in Group A and next 1500 cases (operated between January 2008 to December 2014) in Group B. Preoperative diagnosis, intraoperative findings and injuries especially incidence of CBD injuries with post-operative complications and their management were evaluated.

Results: Out of 3000 cases 2585 (86.1%) were females and 415 (13.8%) were males. Total 18 (0.6%) cases had CBD injury during LC. 17 cases were in group A which decreased significantly to 1 case in Group B. Mean operative time was 30 minutes. Wound infection remained the most common postoperative complication.

Conclusions: In our setup, the burden of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones have increased with very low incidence of complications.

Author Biographies

Jahangir Sarwar Khan, Department of Surgery, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Professor of Surgery 

Surgical Unit 1

Holy Family Hospital Rawalpindi,Pakistan

Raheel Ahmad, Department of Surgery, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

Poatgraduate Resident General Surgery 

Surgical Unit 1

Holy Family Hospital Rawalpindi,Pakistan

References

Shea JA, Berlin JA. Indications and outcome of cholecystectomy: A comparison of pre-and post-laparoscopic era. Ann Surg. 1998;227(3):343-50.

Acakovschi M. Cholesterol gallstone: from epidemiology to prevention. Postgrad Med J. 2001;77(906):221-9.

Bateson MC. Gallstones and cholecystectomy in modern Britain. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76:700-3.

Raza M, Wasty R. An audit of cholecystectomy. PTS. 2007;23(2):104-8.

Utpal D. Evolution of Cholecystectomy: Attribute to Carl August Langenbuch. Indian J Surg. 2004;66(2):97-100.

Leo J, Filipovic G, Krementsova J, Norblad R, Söderholm M, Nilsson E. Open cholecystectomy for all patients in the era of laparoscopic surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMC Surg. 2006;6:5.

Jain PK, Hayden JD, Sedman PC, Royston CMS, Boyle CO. A prospective study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: training, economic, and patient benefits. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(8):1082-5.

Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the new gold standard. Arch Surg. 1992;127(8):917-23.

Bruce DS, Stephen BE. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann Surg. 1991;213(16):665-77.

Toumi Z, White S, Sharma S, Pursnani K. True day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safety and feasibility in a district general hospital in the UK. Web Med Central Hepatol. 2010;1(10):WMC00886.

Halbert C, Pagkratis S, Yang J, Meng Z, Altieri MS, Parikh P, et al. Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era. Surg Endoscopy. 2016;30(6):2239-43.

Rashid T, Naheed A, Farooq U, Iqbal M, Barkat N. Conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy into open cholecystectomy: an experience in 300 cases. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2016;28(1):116-9.

Ali SA, Soomro AG, Mohammad AT, Jarwar M, Siddique AJ. Experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy during a steep learning curve at a university hospital. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2012;24(1):27-29.

Sanjay KB, Langer JG. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an experience of 200 cases. JK Sci. 2004;6(2):73-6.

Lim SH, Salleh I, Poh BK, Tay KH. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. An audit of our learning programme. ANZ J Surg. 2005;75(4):231-3.

Duca S, Bala O, Al-Hajjar N, lancu C, Puia IC, Munteanu D, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations. HPB (Oxford). 2003;5(3):152-8.

Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, D'Acapito F, Vellone M. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of an Italian National Survey on 56591 Cholecystectomies. Arch Surg. 2005;140:986-92

Pekolj J, Alvarez FA, Palavecino M, Clariá SR, Mazza O, de Santibañes E. Intraoperative management and repair of bile duct injuries sustained during 10,123 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a high-volume referral center. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(5):894-901.

Le VH, Smith DE, Johnson BL. Conversion of Laparoscopic to open Cholecystectomy in the current era of laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg. 2012;78(12):1392-5.

Andrus JV, Smiley GST, Sumi I. The tail of the learning curve for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;182(3):250-3.

Tosun A, Hancerliogullari KO, Serifoglu I, Capan Y, Ozkaya E. Role of preoperative sonography in predicting conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Eu J Radiol. 2015;84(3):346-9.

Csikesz NG, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Trends in surgical management for acute cholecystitis. Surg. 2008;144(2):283-9.

Bunting DM. Port-site hernia following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2010;14(4):490-7.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles