Comparative study of two different procedures for primary hypospadias repair


  • Naser R. Tawfiq Department of Surgery, Al-Karama Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Mahmood J. Saood Department of Surgery, Al-Karama Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Mohanad Hamed Abdulla Department of Surgery, Al-Karama Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq



Hypospadias, Iraq, Mathieu, Repair, Snodgrass


Background: Different modalities of procedures for hypospadial repair have been described in the literature. Data about the outcome of two main different procedure of repair are scares from Iraq. The aim of this study is to compare the results of these two methods of hypospadias repairs. The present study compared two single stage hypospadias repairs, namely, tubularized incised plate (Snodgrass) repair and Mathieu’s repair.

Methods: It involved 50 patients diagnosed with penile hypospadias, from March 2011 to April 2015 at the Department of Surgery, Al-Karama Teaching Hospital. After a detailed history, local examination was performed with reference to the site of meatus, shape of glans, and presence of chordee, patients were randomly assigned as Group A of 26 patients in whom Snodgrass repair was accomplished and Group B having 24 patients in whom Mathieu’s repair was performed. On follow-up, the patients were examined for the position of meatus, shape of meatus, urinary stream, urethra-cutaneous fistula, and stricture formation.

Results: The results showed that the mean age of presentation was 7±6 years (range 1-13years). The mean operative time was 90±15 (75-105) minutes and 60±15 (45-75) minutes in Snodgrass and Mathieu’s repair respectively. Complications after surgery were urethero-cutaneous fistula in 2(7.69%) and 4 (16.67%), meatal stenosis in 1(3.84%) and 2(8.33%), wound infection in 4(15.38%) and 3(12.5%) cases in Snodgrass repair and Mathieu repair, respectively, wound dehiscence was equal in Snodgrass repair and Mathieu repair.

Conclusions: It can be concluded that the cosmetic results were excellent with Snodgrass repair with a normal looking slit like meatus.


Ross MD, David FF. Distal hypospadias repair by the modified Thiersch-Duplay technique with or without hinging the urethral plate: a near ideal way to correct distal hypospadias. J Urol. 1999;162:1156-8.

Minevich E, Pecha BR, Wacksman J, Sheldon CA. Methieu hypospadias repair: experience in 202 patients. J Urol. 1999;162:2141.

Snodgrass WT. Tubularised incised plate hypospadias repair: indications, techniques and complications. Urol. 1999;54:6-11.

Snodgrass WT. Tubularised incised urethral plateurethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol. 1994;151:464-65.

Bath AS, Bhandari PS, Mukherjee MK. Repair of distalhypospadias by the tubularised incised plate urethroplasty: A simple versatile technique. Indian J Plast Surg. 2003;36:23-5.

Erol A, Baskin LS, Li YW. Anatomical analysis of the urethral plate: Why preservation of the urethral plate is import-ant in hypospadias repair. Br J UrolInt. 2000;85:728-39.

Sweet RA, Schrott HG, Kurland R, Culp OS. Study of the incidence of hypospadias in Rochester, Minnesota 1940 - 70, and a case control comparison of possible etiologic factors. Mayo Clin Proc. 1974:49:52-8.

Mathieu P. Traitementenun temps de l'hypospadiasbalaniqueoujuxtabalanique. J Chir. 1932;39:481-9.

Wacksman J. Modification of the one-stage flip-flap procedure for repair of distal penile hypospadias. Urol Clin N Am. 1981;8:527-33.

Rabinowitz R. Outpatient catheterless modified Mathieu hypospadias repair. J Urol. 1987;138:1074-82.

Hakim S, Merguerian PA, Rabinowitz R., Shortliffe LD, McKenna PH. Outcome analysis of the modified Mathieu hypospadias repair: comparison of stented and unstented repairs. J Urol. 1996;156:836-43.

Rich MA, Keating MA, Snyder H, Mc C III, Duckett JW. Hinging the urethral plate in hypospadias meatoplasty. J Urol. 1989:142:1551-3.

Bleustein CB, Esposito MP, Soslow RA. Mechanism of healing following the Snodgrass repair. J Urol. 2001;165:277-89.

Snodgrass WT, Lorenzo A. Tubularised incised plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias. BJUInt. 2002;89:90-3.

Cheng EY, Vemulapalli SN, Kropp BP. Snodgrass hypospadias repair with vascularised dartos flap: The perfect repair for virgin cases of hypospadias? J Urol. 2002:168:1723-6.

Buson H, Smiley D, Reinberg Y, Gonzalez R. Distal hypospadias repair without stents: is it better? J Urol. 1994;151:1059-64.

Imamuglu MA, Bakirta H. Comparison of two methods- Mathieu and Snodgrass- in hypospadias repair. UrolInt. 2003;71:251-4.

Oswald J, Komer LI, Riccabona M. Comparison of the perimeatal-based flap (Mathieu) and the tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty (Snodgrass) in primary distal.

Kiss A, Nyirady P, Pirot L, Merksz M. Combined use of perimeatal based flap urethroplasty. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2003;13:383-5.

Tonvichien L, Niramis R. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty in hypospadias repair. Experience at Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health. J Med Ass Thailand. 2003;86(3):S522-30.

Singh N, Sharma E, Sharaf R, Goswamy HL. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (Snodgrass procedure) for distal penile hypospadias: a regional centre experience. Ind J Urol. 2005;21(2):109-11.

EL-Saket HM. Primary distal hypospadias repair: tubularised incised plate urethroplasty (Snodgrass) versus the perimeatal based flape (Mathieu’s) Egypt. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2004;28(1):56-61.

Guo Y, Ma G, Ge Z. Comparison of the Mathieu and the Snodgrass urethroplasty in distal hypospadias repair. Zhonghua Nan KeXue. 2004;10(12):916-18.

Anwar-Ul-Haq AU, Akhter N, Nilofer N, Samiullah S, Javeria J. Comparative study of Mathieu and Snodgrass repair for anterior hypospadias. J Ayub Med Col Abbottabad. 2006;18(2):50-2.






Original Research Articles