Observational study of small bowel perforation in a tertiary care hospital

Authors

  • Shashank Nahar Department of Surgery, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, MJP Rohilkhand University, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Alok Ranjan Department of Surgery, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, MJP Rohilkhand University, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20173411

Keywords:

Exploratory laparotomy, Pneumoperitoneum, Small bowel perforations

Abstract

Background: Perforation of the small intestine causing peritonitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergency encountered in study region. Late presentations with sepsis and septic shock makes evaluation and management of these patients a formidable surgical challenge. The aim of this study was to identify the etiologies, clinical presentation, diagnostic dilemmas and modalities of treatment of the small bowel perforation of diverse etiology in this study region. Objective was to study the demography, etiology, pathology, clinical presentation and various surgical procedures in treatment of small bowel perforation in hospital.

Methods: This study was a prospective observational study conducted in the department of general surgery Rohilkhand medical college Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India from November 2015 to December 2016. 90 patients admitted in the emergency of this hospital who eventually turned out to be those of small bowel perforation were included in this study and an analysis of the demographic data, clinical presentations, radiological findings, site of perforation, surgical procedure performed, surgical complications and duration of hospital stay was done.

Results: Duodenal perforation was the commonest cause of small bowel perforation, contributing to 51 (56.66%) patients. Peptic ulcer disease accounted for 49 (96.07%) patients and blunt trauma abdomen for 2 (3.9%) of these patients.  Jejunal perforations accounted for 9 (10%) patients and ileal perforations for 30 (33.34%) patients. Typhoid fever was the commonest cause of ileal perforation in 24 (80%) patients Blunt trauma abdomen was the commonest cause in 5 (55.55%) patients of jejunal perforations.

Conclusions: Indiscriminate use of NSAIDS/Steroids accounted for most of the peptic ulcer perforation in our region. The other additive factors include alcohol consumption and smoking.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Rajagopalan AE, Pickleman J. Free perforation of the small intestine. Ann Surg. 1982;196(5):576-9.

Williams NS, Christopher JK, Bulstrode CJ, O’Connell PR. Bailey and love’s short practice of surgery, 26th ed. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group; 2013:1040.

Mahapatra S, Panda C. Retrospective case control study on typhoid and non-typhoid small bowel perforation. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(1):40-5.

Ansari AG, Nagvi SQH, Ghumrao AA, Jamali AH. Management of typhoid ileal perforations: a surgical experience of 44cases. Gomal J Med Sci. 2009;7(1):27-30.

Shah S, Gandhi JP. Role of ileostomy in enteric perforation. IJSS J Surg. 2015;1:10-5.

Atamanalp SS, Aydinli B, Ozturk G, Oren D, Basoglu M, Yildirgan MI. Typhoid intestinal perforations: Twenty-six-years’ experience. World J Surg. 2007;31:1883-8.

Seth S, Agrawal KK. A Review of 51 cases of Duodenal perforation in Rohilkhand region. Int J Contemporary Med Res. 2016;3(6):1806-8.

Shrivastava D, Jain AK, Gharde P, Sharma DB, Verma RS. Typhoid intestinal perforation in Central India- a surgical experience of 155 cases in resource limited setting. IJBAR. 2014;5(12):600-4.

Wang YR, Richter JE, Dempsey DT. Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in the united states. 1993 to 2006. Ann Surg. 2010;251:51.

Goudar BV. Isolated “Bow Out” of jejunal perforation following blunt abdominal trauma-Experience of two cases. J Clin Diag Res. 2011;5(5):1120-2.

Singh JP, Steward MJ, Booth TC, Mukhtar H, Murray D. Evolution for imaging for abdominal perforation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:182-8.

Hebbar AK, Shashidhara TM, Iyanna H, Sudhir BV, BV SK. Prospective study of comparison between the ultrasonography with the plain radiography in the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum of hollow viscus perforation. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;2(1):154-9.

Gupta S, Kaushik R, Sharma R, Attri A. Management of large perforations of duodenal ulcers. BMC Surg. 2005;5:15.

Shah S, Gandhi JP. Role of ileostomy in enteric perforation. IJSS J Surg. 2015;1:10-5.

Aston NO, De Costa AM. Tuberculosis perforation of the small bowel. Postgrad Med J. 1985;61(713):251-2.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-24

How to Cite

Nahar, S., & Ranjan, A. (2017). Observational study of small bowel perforation in a tertiary care hospital. International Surgery Journal, 4(8), 2746–2750. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20173411

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles