Clinical study of perforative peritonitis and the role of mannheim peritonitis index in predicting its mortality
Keywords:Multi organ failure, MPI scoring system, Peritoneum, Perforation peritonitis
Background: A scoring system which can compare patient populations and severity of illness, objectively predict mortality, morbidity and can help to evaluate the treatment strategy is the dire need for evaluative research of intensive care.
Methods: The study is done after obtaining a detailed history, complete general physical examination and systemic examination. The patients are subjected to relevant investigations like X-ray erect abdomen, CXR, USG and routine investigations like Hb, TC, urea, creatinine, serum electrolytes.
Results: The study was conducted in a population of 50 patients who had been diagnosed as having peritonitis secondary to hollow viscous perforation. It was observed that perforated appendix was most common cause of peritonitis in our study accounting for 26 percent of the cases.
Conclusions: Despite advancements in the realm of medical science, the management of patients with peritonitis continues to be demanding. In our study it was found that appendicular perforation was the most common cause followed by gastro duodenal perforation.
Dorairajan LN, Gupta S, Deo SVS, Chumber S, Sharma L. Peritonitis in India - a decades experience. Tropical Gastroenterology. 1995;16(1):33-8.
Sharma L, Gupta S, Soin AS, Sikora S, Kapoor V. Generalised peritonitis in India-The tropical spectrum. Japanese J Surg. 1991;2:272-7.
Altemeier WA, Culbeston WR, Fulln W, Shock C. Intra-abdominal abscess. American Journal of Surgery. 1973;125:70-9.
Blot S, De Waele JJ. Critical issues in the clinical management of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Drugs. 2005;65(12):1611-20.
Bohnen J, Boulenger M, Mackin JL. Prognosis in generalized peritonitis, relation to cause and risk factors. Arch Surg. 1983;118:285-90.
Wacha H, Linder MM. Mannheim peritonitis index - prediction of risk of death from peritonitis; construction of a static and validation of an empirically based index. Theoritical Surg. 1987;1:169-77.
Durham H. The mechanism of reaction to peritoneal infection. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1897;4:338-82.
Kaltarentzos FE, Dougenis DV, Cristopolus DC. Prognostic criteria in intra-abdominal sepsis. International Surg J. 1987;72:185-7.
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP. Prognosis in acute organ - system failure. Annals Surg. 1985;202:685-93.
Notash AY. Evaluation of Mannheim peritonitis index and multiple organ failure score in patients with peritonitis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2005;24(5):197.
Fugger R, Rogy M. Validation study of the Mannheim peritonitis index. Chirurg. 1988;59:598-601.
Hiyama DT, Bennion R. Peritonitis and intraperitoneal abscess. Zinner MJ, Schwartz CS. Maingot’s abdominal operations, 1, 10th edition, USA, New York: Appleton and Lange; 2001:663-651.
Verma GR. Gastro-intestinal injuries in abdominal trauma. Tropical Gastroenterol. 1990;11(4):206-10.
Vincent JL, Weil MH, Puri V, Carlson RW. Circulatory shock associated with purulent peritonitis. American J Surg. 1981;142:262-70.
Goris RJ, Te Boekhorst TP, Gimbrere JS, Nuytinck JK. Multiple organ failure: generalized auto destructive inflammation. Archives of Surg. 1985;120:1109-15.
Kohli V. Evaluation of prognostic factors in perforated peptic ulcer. Indian J Surg. 1988;50:184.
Melaney FL, Olip J. Peritonitis: II. Synergism of bacteria commonly found in peritoneal exudates. Archives Surg. 1932;25:709.
Last M, Kutz L, Stein TA. Effect of PEEP on the rate of thoracic duct lymph flow and clearance of bacteria from peritoneal cavity. American J Surg. 1983;145:126.
Rodolfo L, Bracho-Riquelme MC, M en C, Armando Melero-Vela MC, Aidee Torres-Ramírez MC. Mannheim peritonitis index validation study at the hospital general de durango (Mexico). Cirugía y Cirujanos. 2002;70:217-25.
Farquharson M, Moren B. Emergency laparotomy, Farquharson’s Text Book of Operative General Surgery, 9th edition, Edward Arnold Publishers, London, England; 2005:233.