Comparison of total abdominal, vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20163183Keywords:
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, Total abdominal hysterectomy, Vaginal hysterectomyAbstract
Background: Open abdominal hysterectomies was one of the most common and traditional surgical procedure for the removal of uterus in women for the treatment of benign gynecological disease. Vaginal hysterectomy, on the other hand is one of the minimally invasive surgeries which provides less post operative pain and more rapid recovery with lesser number of days of hospital stay. Laparoscopic hysterectomy results in less blood loss than either vaginal or abdominal surgeries and is also more achievable in nulliparous and obese women.
Methods: 198 women who had total abdominal, vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy were included into the study. The route of hysterectomy is guided by the surgical indication for hysterectomy, patient anatomy, data that support the selected procedure, informed patient preference, and the surgeon’s expertise. All the surgeries were done under general anaethesia and cefotaxim was given as the prophylactic antibiotic prior to the surgery.
Results: Most of the women who had come to the hospital for hysterectomy were above the age of 40 years. Most of the women had come for hysterectomy due to dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB), followed by Endometriosis and pelvic pain. Most of the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were in the hospital for less than 5 days while the maximum duration of hospital stay was in the patients who had abdominal surgery. The number of patients who received blood transfusion among all the cases was minimal, though the least requirement was seen among the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. 2 patients who had abdominal surgery had to be readmitted due to complications.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgeries result in a faster recovery time and lesser hospital stay and minimal pain and complications compared to abdominal and even vaginal hysterectomy. However, this type of a surgery requires surgeon’s experience and expertise.
References
Keshavarz H, Hillis SD, Kiele BA, Marchbanks PA. Hysterectomy Surveillance-United States, 1994-1999. MMWR CDC Surveillance Sum. 2002;51(5):1-8.
The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The management of menorrhagia in secondary care. The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 2004. National Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines. Available at www.rcog.org.uk. Accessed on 12 February 2016.
Clinch J. Length of hospital stay after vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(3):253-4.
Wattiez A, Goldchmit R, Durruty G. Minilaparoscopic hysterectomy J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc. 1999;6:97-100.
Montefiore DE, Rouzier R, Chapron C, Darai E. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:260-5.
Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD003677.
Semm K. Endoscopic methods in gastroenterology and gynecology. Completion of diagnostic pelviscopy by endoscopic abdominal surgery. Fortschr Med. 1984;102:534-7.
Scribner DR, Walker JL, Johnson GA, Mcmeekin SD, Gold MA, Mannel RS. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:498-503.
Possover M, Krause N, Plaul K, Heid KR, Schneider A. Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: experience with 150 patients and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 1998;71:19-28.
Kulkarni MM, Rogers RG. Vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease without prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53:5-16.
Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD003677.
Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. Int J Obst Gyn. 2009;116:492-500.
Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, Nervo P, Canis M, Botchorishvili R, et al. The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:339-45.
Cho HY, Choi KJ, Lee YL, Chang KH, Kim HB, Park SH. Comparison of two bipolar systems in laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Society Laparoendo Surg. 2012;16:456-60.
Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Mol BW, Bongers MY, Bremer GL, Vet HC, et al. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:145-52.
Donnez O, Donnez J. A series of 400 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease: a single centre, single surgeon prospective study of complications confirming previous retrospective study Int J Obst Gyn. 2010;117:752-5.
Karaman Y, Bingol B, Gunenç Z. Prevention of complications in laparoscopic hysterectomy: experience with 1120 cases performed by a single surgeon. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:78-84.
Bojahr B, Raatz D, Schonleber G, Abri C, Ohlinger R. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:183-9.
Mccracken G, Hunter D, Morgan D, Price JH. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Ulster Med J. 2006;75(1):54-8.
Hanlan KA, Huang GS, Lopez L, Garnier AC. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for oncological indications with outcomes stratified by age. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95(1):196-203.
O'Hanlan KA, Huang GS, Lopez L, Garnier AC. Selective incorporation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for adnexal pathology and body mass index. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93(1):137-43.
Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:199-205.
Silva CN, Ribeiro SS, Barata S, Alho C, Osório F, Jorge CC. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: retrospective analysis of 262 cases. Acta Med Port. 2014:27:73-81.
Warren L, Ladapo JA, Gunnarsson CL. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;5:581-8.
Malzoni M, Perniola G, Perniola F, Imperato F. Optimizing the total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure for benign uterine pathology. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:211-8.
