Factors influencing the outcome of double valve replacement surgery

Authors

  • Manju Gupta Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Mohd Shoeb Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Pankaj Kumar Mishra Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Sunil Dhar Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Jagdish Prasad Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171994

Keywords:

Double valve surgery, Hospital mortality

Abstract

Background: Data on the influence of surgical variables in mortality and morbidity of patients undergoing double valve replacement (DVR) surgery are scarce. Objective of this study was to identify preoperative, intra operative and post operative factors associated with mortality and morbidity of patients undergoing DVR surgery.

Methods: Between 2010 and 2016, patients who underwent double (Mitral and Aortic) valve replacement at our institution were analyzed. These patients were studied retrospectively for preoperative data and postoperative outcome including causes of deaths and the data was analyzed statistically.

Results: There were 150 patients, 107 were male (71.3%) and 43 were female (28.6%) Present study revealed a high mortality rate among female patient undergoing DVR surgery than males, which is statically significant at p<0.05.  Pre operatively 100 patients (66.6%) were class IV NYHA symptoms. This study finds a significant correlation between preoperative NYHA and hospital mortality with higher mortality rate in NYHA class IV patients with p-value <0.00001 which is significant at p<0.05. Long-term survival was also seen to be significantly dependent on the preoperative LVEF. Among intra operative parameter average total surgical time was 197.70 minutes (3.29 hours); average total cardio pulmonary bypass time was 82.67 minutes (1.37 hours) and average cross clamp time was 67.28 minutes (1.12 hours). Outcome groups (in-hospital death vs. hospital discharge) had a significant statistical difference in relation to variables, respectively: aortic cross clamp time (in minutes) of 77.66 and 67.40 (p=0.001); CPB 95.66 and 84.63 (p=0.006); and total surgical time 208.75 and 186.04 (p=0.002). Among the post operative complications, immediate complications occurring within 7 days of surgery were; low cardiac output syndrome in 9.3% (n=14), bleeding leading to exploration was 8% (n=12), refractory arrhythmias in 3% (n=5), sepsis in 4% (n=6) and acute renal failure in 2% (n=3). Inter mediate post-operative complications (7 to 30 days of surgery) were wound infection in 26 patients (17.3%). There was no incidence of stuck valve or pulmonary thrombo embolism Overall mortality was 8% (12 patients) all within 30 days of operation. There was no statistical difference between the outcome and the types of prostheses used, either biological or metallic (p=0.219).

Conclusions: The study results have demonstrated a favourable survival outcome after DVR surgery. An advance age, female sex, a higher NYHA class, poor left ventricular function are associated with poor outcome. The operative mortality in patients undergoing DVR also depends on intra operative factors like total surgical time, CPB time and aortic cross clamped time and has improved remarkably over time, with the improvisation of extracorporeal circulation methods, myocardial protection techniques and postoperative management.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Manju Gupta, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

asso prof

dept CTVS

Mohd Shoeb, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

mch student

Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

mch student

Sunil Dhar, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

mch student

References

Nowicki ER, Birkmeyer NJ, Weintraub RW, Leavitt BJ, Sanders JH, Dacey LJ, et al. Multivariable prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with aortic and mitral valve surgery in Northern New England. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1966-77.

Birkmeyer NJ, Marrin CA, Morton JR, Leavitt BJ, Lahey SJ, Charlesworth DC, et al. Decreasing mortality for aortic and mitral valve surgery in Northern New England. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:432-7.

Cartwright RS, Giacobine JW, Rattan RS, Ford WB, polish WE. Combined aortic and mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1963;45:35-40.

Multivalvular heart disease. In; Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 5th edn. Saunders. 1997;2:1060-1061.

Stephenson LW, Edie RN, Harken AH, Edmunds LH. Combined aortic and mitral valve replacement: changes in practice and prognosis. Circulation. 1984;69:640-4.

Teoh KH, Christakis GT, Weisel RD, Tong CP, Mickleborough LL, Scully HE, et al. The determinants of mortality and morbidity after multiple-valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;43:353-60.

Arom KV, Nicoloff DM, Kersten TE, Northrup WF, Lindsay WG, Emery RW. Ten-year follow-up study of patients who had double valve replacement with the St Jude Medical prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;98:1008-16.

Schaff HV, Marsh DH. Multiple valve disease. In: Cohn LH, ed. Cardiac surgery in the adult. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill; USA: 2003:425-4302.

Jamieson WR, Edwards FH, Schwartz, M, Bero JW, Clark RE, Grover FL. Risk stratification for valve replacement. National Cardiac Surgery Database. Database Committee of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67(4):943-51.

Talwar S, Mathur A, Choudhary SK, Singh R, Kumar AS. Aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair compared with combined aortic and mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(4):1219-25.

Bortolotti U, Milano A, Testolin L, Tursi V, Mazzucco A, Gallucci V. Influence of type of prosthesis on late results after combined mitral-aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52:84-91.

Litmathe J, Boeken U, Kurt M, Feindt P, Gams E. Predictive risk factors in double-valve replacement (AVR and MVR) compared to isolated aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54:459-63.

Teoh KH, Christakis GT, Weisel RD, Tong CP, Mickleborough LL, Scully HE, et al. The determinants of mortality and morbidity after multiple-valve Operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;43:353-8.

Karp RB, Cyrus RJ, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, Kouchoukos NT, Pacifico AD. The Björk-Shiley valve: intermediate-term follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981;81:602-14.

Bernal JM, Rabasa JM, Gutierrez-Garcia F, Morales C, Nistal J, Revuelta JM. The CarboMedics valve: experience with 1,049 implants. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:137-43.

Talwar S, Jayanthkumar HV, Kumar AS. Chordal preservation during mitral valve replacement: basis, techniques and results. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;21:45-52.

Kopf GS, Hammond GL, Geha AS, Elefteriades J, Hashim SW. Long-term performance of the St. Jude Medical valve: low incidence of thromboembolism and hemorrhagic complications with modest doses of warfarin. Circulation. 1987;76:(3):132-6.

John S, Ravikumar E, John CN, Bashi VV. 25-year experience with 456 combined mitral and aortic valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1167-72.

Sethia B, Turner MA, Lewis S, Rodger RA, Bain WH. Fourteen years experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;91:350-61.

Bortolotti U, Milano A, Testolin L, Tursi V, Mazucci A, Gallucci V. Influence of type of prostheses on late results after combined mitral and aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;52:84-9.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-24

How to Cite

Gupta, M., Shoeb, M., Mishra, P. K., Dhar, S., & Prasad, J. (2017). Factors influencing the outcome of double valve replacement surgery. International Surgery Journal, 4(6), 1913–1917. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171994

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles