Is it time to write obituary for open choledocholithotomy in the present era of endoscopic management? Outcome of surgery for failed endoscopic extraction, retrospective study

Authors

  • Rajkumar Sharma Department of Surgery, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra at Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Vipan Kumar Department of Surgery, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra at Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Niraj Gupta Department of Surgery, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra at Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Kirti Rana Department of Surgery, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra at Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Amit Dogra Department of Surgery, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra at Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Anupam Nanda Department of Surgery, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra at Tanda, Himachal Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171140

Keywords:

CBD stones, Choledocholithiasis, Choledocholithotomy, ERCP

Abstract

Background: Between 05 to 20 percent of patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstones, have choledocholithiasis. Treatment of the common bile duct (CBD) stones can be conducted as open cholecystectomy and open CBD exploration or laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic CBD exploration (LC + LCBDE) versus pre- or post-cholecystectomy endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in two stages, usually combined with either sphincterotomy or sphincteroplasty (papillary dilatation) for CBD clearance. The merits and demerits of individual techniques are yet to be settled.

Methods: We reviewed the outcome of patients operated at our centre after failed endoscopic clearance of CBD stones. Over a period of 03 years, total 2145 laparoscopic/open cholecystectomies were performed at our institute. In the same time period, 14 patients (06 males and 08 females) presented with choledocholithiasis after failed ERCP extraction (median age 59 years, range 29-62 years). All the patients had undergone ERCP and ± sphincterotomy/sphincteroplasty with failed clearance. None of the patient had undergone a cholecystectomy previously.

Results: We performed open choledocholithotomy with T-tube drainage plus cholecystectomy in all the patients. There were no deaths and only one major complication. Surgery resulted in complete duct clearance in 93% of patients.

Conclusions: Open surgery can be performed safely and effectively in patients with retained bile duct stones and surgery can be offered as primary modality of treatment over combined endoscopic management after appropriated patient selection.

References

Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O’Sullivan GC. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg. 2004;239:28-33.

Petelin JB. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg. Endosc. 2003;17:1705-15.

O’Neill CJ, Gillies DM, Gani JS. Choledocholithiasis: overdiagnosed endoscopically and undertreated laparoscopically. ANZ J. Surg. 2008;78:487-91.

Prat F, Meduri B, Ducot B, Chiche R, Salimbeni-Bartolini R, Pelletier G. Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests. Ann Surg. 1999;229:362-8.

Dasari BVM, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3;(9):CD003327.

Janssen J, Halboos A, Greiner L. EUS accurately predicts the need for therapeutic ERCP in patients with a low probability of biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:470-6.

Singhal A, Rowe G, Faizallah R. Pulse fluoroscopy in ERCP: Reducing radiation exposure. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:AB300.

Horton RC, Lauri A, Dooley JS. Endoscopic removal of common duct stones; current indications and controversies. Postgrad Med J. 1991;67:107-11.

Vaira D, D'Anna I, Ainley C. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet. 1989;2:431-4.

Lauri A, Horton RC, Davidson BR, Burroughs AK, Dooley JS. Endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones: management related to stone size. Gut. 1993;34:1718-21.

Persson B. Relation of size and number of common duct calculi to success of sphincterotomy and stone extraction. Gastrointest Radiol. 1991;16:212-4.

Neoptolemos JP, Davidson BR, Shaw DE, Lloyd D, Garr-Locke DL, Fossard DP. Study of common bile duct exploration and endoscopic sphincterotomy in a consecutive series of 438 patients. Br J Surg. 1987;74:916-21.

Garlett PC, McGinn FP. Choledochoscopy: are stones missed? A controlled study. Br J Surg. 1984;71:767-70.

Neuhaus N, Hoffmann W, Zillinger C, Classen M. Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones under direct visual control. Gut. 1993;34:415-21.

Lindstrom E, Borch K, Kullman EP, Tiselius HG, Ihse I. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of bile duct stones: a single institution experience. Gut. 1992;33:1416-20.

Neoptolemos JP, Hall C, O'Connor HJ, Murray WR, Carr- Locke DL. Methyl tert butyl ether for treating bile duct stones: the British experience. Br J Surg. 1990;77:32-5.

Schneider MU, Matek W, Bauer R, Domschke W. Mechanical lithotripsy of bile duct stones in 209 patients. Effect of technical advances. Endoscopy. 1988;20:248-53.

Siegel JH, Ben Zui JS, Pullano WE. Mechanical lithotripsy of common duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;36:351-6.

Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, Siperstein AE, Schecter WP, Campbell AR, et al. Prospective randomised trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):28-33.

Bansal VK, Misra MC, Garg P, Prabhu M. A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1986-9.

Coelho-Prabhu N, Shah ND, Van Houten H, Kamath PS, Baron TH. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: utilisation and outcomes in a 10-year population-based cohort. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5):e002689.

Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP. Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet. 1998;351(9097):159-61.

Nathanson LK, O’Rourke NA, Martin IJ, Fielding GA, Cowen AE, Roberts RK, et al. Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(2):188-92.

Csendes A, Diaz JC, Burdiles P, Maluenda F, Mirales E. Risk factors and classification of acute suppurative cholangitis. Br J Surg. 1992;79:655-8.

Hammarström LE, Holmin T, Stridbeck H, Ihse I. Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized study of endoscopic versus surgical treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg.1995;82:1516-21.

Targarona EM, Perez Ayuso RM, Bordas JM. Randomised trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with gallbladder left in situ versus open surgery for common bile duct calculi in high-risk patients. Lancet. 1996;347:926-9.

Stiegmann GV, Goff JS, Mansour A, Pearlmann N, Reveille RM, Norton L. Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography and common duct exploration. Am J Surg. 1992;163:227-30.

European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES); Ductal Stone Co-operative Group, Cushieri A, Croce E, Faggioni A. EAES Ductal Stone Study: preliminary findings of multi-center prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:1130-5.

Suc B, Escat J, Cherqui D, Fourtanier G, Hay J, Fingerhut A, et al. Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones. A multicenter randomized trial. Arch Surg. 1998;133(7):702-8.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles