A double blind randomized clinical trial as preemptive and preclosure analgesia using bupivicaine in post operative pain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20163171Keywords:
Preemptive, Preclosure analgesia, Bupivicaine, Post-operative painAbstract
Background: Post-operative pain management has been a constant challenge to many of the surgeons. Effective relief of pain has got physiological and psychological benefits. Because of their side effects most of the analgesic dosage is inadequate. There is need for developing newer modalities which can provide good analgesia with fewer side effects. The aim of the study was to compare preemptive and preclosure infiltration of bupivacaine in reducing post-operative pain and analgesic requirement.
Methods: Double blind randomized clinical trial was done in GIMS Hospital Gadag, Karnataka, India. Total of 40 patients, 10 undergoing open cholecystectomy, 10 undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 20 undergoing elective laparotomy were included in study. Post-operative pain measured using numerical VAS and amount of analgesic use.
Results: In the whole group comparison though the pain score was less in preemptive group but it was not significant. Requirement of rescue analgesia occurred early in preclosure group and also there was significant difference in analgesic requirement at 6th hour and at 10th hour.
Conclusions: Overall, though preemptive infiltration of bupivacaine reduces pain better than preclosure infiltration in common abdominal surgeries but it may be not significant. Preemptive infiltration of bupivacaine delays the time duration for the requirement of first analgesic dose and may also be helpful in reducing the number of analgesic doses in postoperative period when compared to preclosure infiltration in common abdominal surgeries.
References
Coderre TJ, Katz J, Vaccarino AL, Melzack R. Contribution of central neuroplasticity to pathological pain: review of clinical and experimental evidence. Pain. 1993;52:259-85.
Woolf CJ. Evidence for a central component of post-injury pain hypersensitivity. Nature. 1983;306:686-8.
Rockville MD. Acute pain management: operative or medical procedures and trauma. Clinical practice, Guideline No. 1992;1:116-7.
Carr DB, Jacox AK, Capman CR, Ferrell B, Fields HL, Heidrich G. Clinical practice guidelines for acute pain management: operative or medical procedures and trauma. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, DHHS. 1992; Publication no. 95:0034.
Kehlet H. Surgical stress: the role of pain and analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 1989;63(2):189-95.
Gottschaik A, Smith DS. New concepts in pain therapy: preemptive analgesia. American Family Physician. 2001;63(10):1979-85.
Turner GA, Chalkiadis G. Comparison of preoperative with postoperative lignocaine infiltration on postoperative analgesic requirements. British J Anaesthasia. 1994;72:541-3.
Hannibal K, Galatius H, Hansen A, Obel E, Ejlersen E. Preoperative wound infiltration with bupivacaine reduces early and late opioid requirement after hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:376-81.
Raymond KE, Portera SG, Bagous W, Lincon S. A randomized double-blinded trial of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 1998;92(6):972-5.
Bourget JL, Clark J, Joy N. Comparing preincisional with post incisional bupivacaine infiltration in the post-operative pain management. Arch Surg. 1997;132:766-9.
Tverskoy M, Cozacov C, Ayache M, Bradley EL. Kission I. Postoperative pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy with different types of anaesthesia. Anaesthe Analg. 1990;70:29-35.
