Intraoperative transit time flow measurement to predict clinical outcomes in patient undergoing on pump coronary artery bypass graft

Authors

  • Chollada Suwannachod Department of Surgery, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Nakorn Boonme Department of Surgery, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20171129

Keywords:

Coronary artery bypass graft, Ejection fraction, Pulsatility index, Transit time flow measurement

Abstract

Background: Transit time flow measurement (TTFM) is used for intraoperative graft measurement to estimate graft failure. PI≤3 was suggested because it shows lower incidence of early graft failure. Objective of the study was to compare myocardial function and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, between PI≤3 in all grafts (optimal group) and PI >3 in one or more grafts (suboptimal group) by Transit time flow measurement (TTFM).

Methods: 90 patients who underwent CABG since June 2012 to December 2014 were included. Patients were classified into 2 groups: Optimal group (n=32) and Suboptimal group (n=58). CABG with intraoperative TTFM was performed as standard. Postoperative outcomes of both groups were compared.

Results: Patients whose postoperative EF was increased were found in optimal group more than suboptimal group (62.1% vs 25%, p<0.001). The patients whose postoperative EF increased equal or more than 5% was found in optimal group more than suboptimal group (73.2% vs 25%, p=0.002). Suboptimal group found one patient with myocardial infarction but optimal group found none (3.13% and 0%). Postoperative atrial fibrillation and prolong ventilator more than 48 hours were found in suboptimal group more than optimal group (43.75% vs 37.93%, 62.50% vs 37.93%). In midterm, postoperative follow-up, all-cause mortality in suboptimal group was higher than optimal group (3.13% vs 1.72).

Conclusions: Optimal group had patients whose postoperative EF significantly increased more than suboptimal group. Tendency of finding postoperative complications in suboptimal group was more than in optimal group.

References

Nishi H, Miyamoto S, Takanashi S, Minamimura H, Ishikawa T, Shimizu Y. Complete revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;9(2):23-7.

Bax JJ, Visser FC, Poldermans D, Elhendy A, Cornel JH, Boersma E, et al. Relationship between preoperative viability and postoperative improvement in LVEF and heart failure symptoms. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:79-86.

Elhendy A, Cornel JH, Domburg RT, Bax JJ, Roelandt JR. Effect of coronary artery bypass surgery on myocardial perfusion and ejection fraction response to inotropic stimulation in patients without improvement in resting ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(5):490-4.

Becit N, Erkut B, Ceviz M, Unlu Y, Colak A, Kocak H. The impact of intraoperative transit time flow measurement on the results of on-pump coronary surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32:313-8.

Kieser TM, Rose S, Kowalewski R, Belenkie I. Transit-time flow predicts outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft patients: a series of 1000 consecutive arterial grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;38:155-62.

Schmitz C, Ashraf O, Schiller W, Preusse CJ, Esmailzadeh B, Likungu JA, et al. Transit time flow measurement in on-pump and off-pump coronary artery surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:645-50.

Tokuda Y, Song MH, Oshima H, Usui A, Ueda Y. Predicting midterm coronary artery bypass graft failure by intraoperative transit time flow measurement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:532-6.

Ancona GD, Karamanoukian HL, Ricci M, Bergsland J, Salerno TA. Graft patency verification in coronary artery bypass grafting: principles and clinical applications of transit time flow measurement. Angiology. 2000;51:725-31.

Gottdiener, John S. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for use of echocardiography in clinical trials. A report from the American society of echocardiography's guidelines and standards committee and the task force on echocardiography in clinical trials. J Am Society Echocardiography. 2004;10:1086-11.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles