Magnetic resonance imaging classification of perianal fistula and its surgical correlation: a prospective observational study

Partha Pratim Mandal; Subhasish Sarker; Kakali Mandal

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263848

Authors

Partha Pratim Mandal Department of Surgery College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Medical College and Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Subhasish Sarker Department of Surgery College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Medical College and Hospital Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Kakali Mandal Deputy Nursing Superintendent, R. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263848

Keywords:

Perianal fistula, Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI classification, Parks classification, St James's grading, Surgical correlation

Abstract

Background: Perianal fistula is a common anorectal disorder characterized by chronic infection and abnormal communication between the anal canal and perianal skin. Successful treatment depends on complete identification of the primary tract, secondary extensions, internal opening, and associated abscesses before surgery. Clinical examination alone often underestimates the complexity of disease, particularly in recurrent and complex fistulas. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has emerged as the imaging modality of choice because of its excellent soft tissue contrast and multiplanar capability. The aim is to evaluate the MRI classification of perianal fistula according to anatomical type and MRI grading system and to correlate these findings with intraoperative observations.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months at two surgical centers in West Bengal, India.

Results: The study included 50 patients with a mean age of 48.44±12.45 years. Males constituted 56% of the study population. Intersphincteric fistulas were the most common anatomical type (54%), followed by transsphincteric (20%), suprasphincteric (18%), and extrasphincteric (8%). Grade I fistulas represented 46% of all cases. MRI accurately demonstrated the primary tract in all patients and showed excellent agreement with operative findings regarding fistula classification and anatomical extent.

Conclusions: MRI provides accurate anatomical classification of perianal fistulas and correlates closely with operative findings. Routine preoperative MRI improves surgical planning, assists in identifying complex disease, and may reduce postoperative recurrence.

References

Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976;63(1):1-12.

Morris J, Spencer JA, Ambrose NS. MR imaging classification of perianal fistulas and its implications for patient management. Radiographics. 2000;20(3):623-35.

Spencer JA, Chapple K, Wilson D, Ward J, Windsor AC, Ambrose NS. Outcome after surgery for perianal fistula: predictive value of MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(2):403-6.

Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Williams AB, Cohen CR, Tarroni D, Phillips RK, et al. Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano. Lancet. 2002;360(9346):1661-2.

Buchanan GN, Halligan S, Bartram CI, Williams AB, Tarroni D, Cohen CRG. Clinical examination, endosonography, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of fistula in ano: comparison with outcome-based reference standard. Radiology. 2004;233(3):674-81.

Halligan S, Stoker J. Imaging of fistula in ano. Radiology. 2006;239(1):18-33.

Dwarkasing S, Hussain SM, Krestin GP. Magnetic resonance imaging of perianal fistulas. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2005;26(4):247-58.

de Miguel Criado J, García del Salto L, Fraga Rivas P, Aguilera del Hoyo LF, Gutiérrez Velasco L, Díez Pérez de las Vacas MI, et al. MR imaging evaluation of perianal fistulas: spectrum of imaging features. Radiographics. 2012;32(1):175-194.

Sahni VA, Ahmad R, Burling D. Which method is best for imaging of perianal fistula? Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(1):26-30.

West RL, Zimmerman DDE, Dwarkasing RS, Hussain SM, Hop WCJ, Schouten WR, et al. Prospective comparison of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging of perianal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(10):1407-15.

Schwartz DA, Wiersema MJ, Dudiak KM, Fletcher JG, Clain JE, Tremaine WJ, et al. A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and exam under anesthesia for evaluation of Crohn's perianal fistulas. Gastroenterology. 2001;121(5):1064-72.

Siddiqui MRS, Ashrafian H, Tozer P, Daulatzai N, Burling D, Hart A, et al. A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for perianal fistula assessment. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(5):576-85.