Extrauterine migration of an intrauterine device to the right iliac fossa: a rare case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263365Keywords:
Intrauterine device, IUD migration, Extrauterine IUD, Right iliac fossa, Fallopian tube, Laparotomy, Low-resource settingAbstract
Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are highly effective, reversible methods of contraception, but uterine perforation and extrauterine migration are uncommon complications. We report the case of a 32-year-old multiparous woman who presented by self-referral from another healthcare facility with a two-week history of right iliac fossa pain and a history of IUD insertion. Abdominal ultrasonography was unremarkable but demonstrated an empty uterine cavity despite the absence of a history of IUD expulsion. A plain abdominal radiograph was subsequently obtained, which demonstrated the IUD in the right iliac fossa. She underwent open exploratory laparotomy, which revealed the IUD lying freely in the right iliac fossa close to the fimbrial end of the right fallopian tube. There was no identifiable uterine perforation, scar, or defect. However, the right fallopian tube was oedematous, raising the possibility of an unusual route of migration through the right uterine ostium, along the fallopian tube and through the fimbrial end into the peritoneal cavity. The IUD was removed, and bilateral tubal ligation was performed at the patient's request because she had completed her desired family size and declined other contraceptive methods. Her postoperative recovery was uneventful, and subsequent follow-up was satisfactory. This case highlights the importance of careful history taking, appropriate evaluation of a missing IUD, and prompt management, particularly in low-resource settings where advanced imaging and minimally invasive surgery may not be readily available.
References
Kupoluyi JA. Long-acting reversible methods of contraception: trends, levels, and predictors among married women of reproductive age in Nigeria. Contracept Reprod Med. 202;10(1):49.
Al-Darwish AS, Saffaf MK, Bawareth R, AlHawassi S. Intraperitoneal migration of an intrauterine device: a case report. J Surg Case Rep. 2025;2025(7):rjaf579.
Massay CS, Rivenes Lafontan S, Rogathi JJ, Safari US, Sigalla GN. Intrauterine Device Use and Perceptions Among Women in Tanzania-A Mixed Methods Study. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024;10:23779608241305782.
Li Q, Qi D, Bi T, Guo X and Chen H. Case report: Uterine perforation caused by migration of intrauterine devices. Front. Med. 2024;11:1455207.
Lanzola EL, Auber M, Ketvertis K. Intrauterine Device Placement and Removal. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026.
Goswami D, Ravi AK, Sharma A. Missing IUCD Strings: Role of Imaging in Locating the Misplaced Device. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(4):QJ01-2.
Kori A, Meravi J, Thakur S, Sirpurkar M, Surana S, Kumar A. Radiographic presentation (X-ray) of misplaced intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs). Bioinformation. 2025;21(7):1996-2000.
Maebayashi A, Kato K, Hayashi N, Nagaishi M, Kawana K. Importance of abdominal X-ray to confirm the position of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2022 May 26;10(15):4904-10.
Kaplanoğlu M, Bülbül M, Yüce T, Kaplanoğlu D, Aban M. Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: Diagnosis and surgical management. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2015;16(2):91-5.
Kassa N, Malore E, Shalemo YAA, Tsega K, Abode Y. Laparoscopic Management of a Migrated Intrauterine Device Causing a Partial-Thickness Rectal Injury Diagnosed Following Contraceptive Failure: A Case Report. Cureus. 2026;18(1):e101538.
Wangwe PJ, Awadh N, Angelus M. Intrauterine device (IUD) migration to the fallopian tube: a rare location for a translocated IUD with no visceral injury. Contracept Reprod Med. 2024;9(1):36.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Martin A. Nde, Iniobong M. Nde, Reuben O. Iweka

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.