Perioperative adverse events in neurosurgery – incidence, pattern and associated factors in a Nigerian tertiary hospital

Oluwamuyiwa A. Dada; Mercy O. Adetoye; Abiodun  I. Okunlola; Jide M. Michael

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263336

Authors

Oluwamuyiwa A. Dada Department of Surgery, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria
Mercy O. Adetoye Department of Surgery, Neurosurgery Unit, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria
Abiodun I. Okunlola Department of Surgery, Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria
Jide M. Michael Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263336

Keywords:

Perioperative safety, Neurosurgery, Adverse events, Surgical safety, WHO, WHO surgical safety checklist, Nigeria, Postoperative complications

Abstract

Background: Perioperative adverse events remain important causes of morbidity and mortality after neurosurgery, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluated their frequency, pattern and associated factors at a Nigerian tertiary hospital.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted among patients undergoing cranial or spinal neurosurgical procedures at Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria, from January 2022 to December 2024. Demographic, clinical, operative and outcome data were extracted from hospital records. Associations were assessed using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, followed by multivariable logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported.

Results: Of 126 identified cases, 103 met eligibility criteria. Mean age was 46.9±18.3 years and 65.0% were male. Cranial procedures accounted for 68.9% and emergency procedures for 57.3%. Thirty-four patients (33.0%) experienced at least one perioperative adverse event. The most frequent events were intraoperative hypotension, electrolyte disturbances, excessive blood loss, surgical site infection and reoperation. Neurological improvement occurred in 67.0%, while mortality was 8.7%. Emergency surgery (AOR 2.63, 95% CI 1.10–6.31), ASA III–IV (AOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.01–5.72), blood loss >500 ml (AOR 3.78, 95% CI 1.48–9.67), surgery >4 hours (AOR 2.92, 95% CI 1.19–7.15) and incomplete checklist completion (AOR 3.46, 95% CI 1.01–11.88) were independently associated with adverse events.

Conclusions: Perioperative adverse events were common. Strengthened risk assessment, haemostatic management, operative efficiency and complete checklist implementation may support safer neurosurgical care.

References

Rolston JD, Bernstein M. Errors in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015;26(2):149-55.

Wong JM, Bader AM, Laws ER, Popp AJ, Gawande AA. Patterns in neurosurgical adverse events and proposed strategies for reduction. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(5):E1.

Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491-9.

Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJ. Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(3):229-35.

Hariharan D, Lobo DN. Retained surgical sponges, needles and instruments. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(2):87-92.

Devine J, Chutkan N, Norvell DC, Dettori JR. Avoiding wrong site surgery: a systematic review. Spine. 2010;35(9 Suppl):S28-36.

Haugen AS, Softeland E, Almeland SK, Sevdalis N, Vonen B, Eide GE, et al. Effect of the World Health Organization checklist on patient outcomes: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;261(5):821-8.

Patel J, Ahmed K, Guru KA, Khan F, Marsh H, Khan MS, et al. An overview of the use and implementation of checklists in surgical specialities: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1317-23.

McConnell DJ, Fargen KM, Mocco J. Surgical checklists: a detailed review of their emergence, development and relevance to neurosurgical practice. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:2.

Westman M, Takala R, Rahi M, Ikonen TS. The need for surgical safety checklists in neurosurgery now and in the future: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:614-28.

Lyons MK. Eight-year experience with a neurosurgical checklist. Am J Med Qual. 2010;25(4):285-8.

Hill MR, Roberts MJ, Alderson ML, Gale TC. Safety culture and the five steps to safer surgery: an intervention study. Br J Anaesth. 2015;114(6):958-62.

Ong AP, Devcich DA, Hannam J, Lee T, Merry AF, Mitchell SJ. A paperless wall-mounted surgical safety checklist with migrated leadership can improve compliance and team engagement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):971-6.

Pearse RM, Beattie S, Clavien PA, Demartines N, Fleisher LA, Grocott MPW, et al. Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(5):601-9.

Adeleye AO. Low rates of post-craniotomy surgical site infections in a developing country: surgical technique and results. Br J Neurosurg. 2018;32(2):136-40.

Adeleye AO, Ogun GO. Clinically diagnosed postoperative venous thromboembolism in a neurosurgery practice in Nigeria. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:259-65.

Adeleye AO, Fasunla JA, Young PH. Skull base surgery in a large, resource-poor, developing country with few neurosurgeons: prospects, challenges and needs. World Neurosurg. 2012;78(1-2):35-43.

Robertson FC, Esene IN, Kolias AG, Khan T, Rosseau G, Gormley WB, et al. Global perspectives on task-shifting and task-sharing in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg X. 2019;6:100060.

Zuckerman SL, Fargen KM, Mocco J. Neurosurgical checklists: a growing need. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015;26(2):219-29.

Enchev Y. Checklists in neurosurgery to decrease preventable medical errors: a review. Balkan Med J. 2015;32(4):337-46.