Gracilis muscle flap reconstruction as a surgical alternative in anorectal pathology: a report of three cases at ISSEMYM Medical Center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20262797Keywords:
Gracilis muscle flap, Rectovaginal fistula, Rectovesical fistula, Rectal prolapse, Graciloplasty, Perineal reconstruction, Case seriesAbstract
Recurrent anovaginal and rectovesical fistulas, and recurrent rectal prolapse, remain challenging for colorectal and reconstructive surgeons because of high recurrence rates, fibrosis from prior surgery, impaired sphincter function, and poor local tissue quality. The pedicled gracilis muscle flap is a versatile option, used as an interposition flap for complex fistulas or as static graciloplasty to support the sphincter complex and pelvic floor in selected prolapse cases. We describe the characteristics, management, and early outcomes of three patients who underwent gracilis reconstruction at ISSEMYM Medical Center between 2025 and 2026: two with complex fistulas and one with recurrent rectal prolapse. The first, with a history of radical prostatectomy, developed a persistent rectovesical fistula treated by fistula takedown and gracilis interposition after failed primary repair. The second, a 59-year-old woman with a recurrent low rectovaginal fistula, underwent resection of fibrotic tissue and gracilis interposition after failed fistulectomy and sphincter repair, later showing persistent recurrence. The third, an 81-year-old woman with recurrent rectal prolapse after prior rectopexy, underwent static graciloplasty with a Thiersch ring; her course was complicated by wound dehiscence, intestinal obstruction requiring colostomy, and hospital-acquired pneumonia, but she achieved a favorable outcome with no recurrence. The pedicled gracilis flap is a safe, reproducible option for complex fistulas and static graciloplasty in recurrent rectal prolapse, particularly after failed conventional treatment. It delivers well-vascularized tissue, reinforces tissue barriers, and supports the sphincter complex, though success depends on lesion etiology, fibrosis, prior surgeries, tissue quality, and patient selection.
References
Maspero M, Otero Piñeiro A, Steele SR, Hull TL. Gracilis Muscle Interposition for the Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66(5):631-45.
Hotouras A, Ribas Y, Zakeri S, Murphy J, Bhan C, Chan CL. Gracilis muscle interposition for rectovaginal and anovaginal fistula repair: a systematic literature review. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17(2):104-10.
Samplaski MK, Wood HM, Lane BR, Remzi FH, Lucas A, Angermeier KW. Functional and quality-of-life outcomes in patients undergoing transperineal repair with gracilis muscle interposition for complex rectourethral fistula. Urology. 2011;77(3):736-41.
Emile SH, Wignakumar A, Horesh N, Garoufalia Z, Strassmann V, Boutros M, et al. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of surgical treatment of complete rectal prolapse in male patients. Tech Coloproctol. 2024;28(1):158.
Tsunoda A. Surgical Treatment of Rectal Prolapse in the Laparoscopic Era; A Review of the Literature. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2020;4(3):89-99.
McNevin MS. Evaluation and Management of Rectal Prolapse. Surg Clin North Am. 2024;104(3):557-64.
Baeten CGMI, Konsten J, Spaans F, Visser R, Habets AMMC, et al. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. The Lancet. 1991;338(8776):1166-9.
Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM, Heineman E, Konsten J, Engel GL, et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(24):1600-5.
Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P, Young J, Eyers T, Kiroff G, et al. Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 2002;89(2):138-53.
Garoufalia Z, Gefen R, Emile SH, Silva-Alvarenga E, Horesh N, Freund MR, et al. Gracilis muscle interposition for complex perineal fistulas: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Colorectal Dis. 2023;25(4):549-61.
Zmora O, Potenti FM, Wexner SD, Pikarsky AJ, Efron JE, Nogueras JJ, et al. Gracilis muscle transposition for iatrogenic rectourethral fistula. Ann Surg. 2003;237(4):483-7.
Chessin DB, Hartley J, Cohen AM, Mazumdar M, Cordeiro P, Disa J, et al. Rectus flap reconstruction decreases perineal wound complications after pelvic chemoradiation and surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(2):104-10.
Lyons ME, Goldman JJ. Gracilis Tissue Transfer. 2023. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026.
Cera SM, Wexner SD. Muscle transposition: does it still have a role? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005;18(1):46-54.
Strassmann V, Silva-Alvarenga E, Emile SH, Garoufalia Z, DaSilva G, Wexner SD. Gracilis muscle interposition: a valuable tool for the treatment of failed repair of post-partum rectovaginal fistulas—a single-center experience. Am Surg. 2023;89(12):6366-9.
Gagnier JJ, Riley D, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Kienle G; CARE Group. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013;110(37):603-8.
Corman M, Nicholls RJ, Fazio VW, Bergamaschi R. Corman's colon and rectal surgery (6th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
Abbas MA, Jackson CH, Haigh PI. Predictors of outcome for anal fistula surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146(9):1011-6.
Hull TL, Fazio VW. Surgical approaches to low anovaginal fistula in Crohn's disease. Am J Surg. 1997;173(2):95-8.
Pinto RA, Peterson TV, Shawki S, Davila GW, Wexner SD. Are there predictors of outcome following rectovaginal fistula repair? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(9):1240-7.