A comparative study of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and open thoracotomy in the surgical management of thoracic empyema

Avinash Dal; Venkata Anil Chandra Dronamraju

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263348

Authors

Avinash Dal Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, TX Hospital, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Venkata Anil Chandra Dronamraju Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Gayatri Vidya Parishad Institute of Health Care and Medical Technology, Marikavalasa, Visakhapatnam, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263348

Keywords:

Thoracic empyema, VATS, Open throracotomy, Postoperative pain, Cosmetic Outcome

Abstract

Background: Thoracic empyema represents a challenging clinical condition, particularly in advanced stages requiring surgical intervention. While open thoracotomy has traditionally been the standard approach, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative with potential benefits. To compare postoperative outcomes, safety, and cosmetic results between VATS and open thoracotomy in patients undergoing surgical management for thoracic empyema.

Methods: This comparative study included 50 patients diagnosed with advanced thoracic empyema who underwent surgical management. Patients were equally divided into two groups: VATS (n=25) and open thoracotomy (n=25). Demographic characteristics, postoperative pain scores, duration of hospital stay, cosmetic outcomes, and postoperative complications were assessed and compared.

Results: Both groups were demographically comparable. Patients in the VATS group experienced significantly lower postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, fewer postoperative complications, and superior cosmetic outcomes compared to those undergoing open thoracotomy. The overall safety profile of VATS was favorable, with no increase in perioperative risk.

Conclusion: VATS is a safe and effective surgical approach that offers clear advantages over open thoracotomy in the management of thoracic empyema, supporting its use as the preferred initial surgical modality in appropriately selected patients.

References

Davies HE, Davies RJ, Davies CW; British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65 Suppl 2:ii41-53.

Light RW. Parapneumonic effusions and empyema. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006;3(1):75-80.

Watkins E Jr, Fielder CR. Management of nontuberculous empyema. Surg Clin North Am. 1961;41(3):681-93.

Molnar TF. Current surgical treatment of thoracic empyema in adults. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 Sep;32(3):422-30.

Chambers A, Routledge T, Billè A, Scarci M. Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical decortication superior to open surgery in the management of adults with primary empyema?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;11(2):171-7.

Jindal R, Singh S, Sharma S, Singh S. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thoracotomy in the management of empyema: A comparative study. J Minimal Access Surg. 2021;17(4):470-8.

Waller DA, Rengarajan A. Thoracoscopic decortication: a role for video-assisted surgery in chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(6):1813-6.

Cardillo G, Carleo F, Carbone L, Di Martino M, Salvadori L, Petrella L, Martelli M. Chronic postpneumonic pleural empyema: comparative merits of thoracoscopic versus open decortication. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36(5):914-8.

Tong BC, Hanna J, Garfein ES, Onaitis MW, D'Amico TA, Harpole DH, Berry MF. Outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic decortication. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(1):220-5.

Ahmed AEH, Yacoub TE. Empyema thoracis. Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2010;4:1-8.

Scarci M, Caruana E, Bertolaccini L, Bedetti B, Brunelli A, Casali G, et al. EACTS expert consensus statement for surgical management of pleural empyema. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;48(5):642-53.

Shahin Y, Duffy J, Beggs D, Black E, Majewski A. Surgical management of primary empyema of the pleural cavity: outcome of VATS versus thoracotomy. Chest. 2010;137(3):520-5.