A study of the learning curve of total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia among young laparoscopic surgeons in a tertiary care centre in an urban city

Girish Bakhshi; Rupali Choradia; Samyukta Bhardwaj; Pritesh Joshi

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263346

Authors

Girish Bakhshi Department of General Surgery, J. J. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Rupali Choradia Department of General Surgery, J. J. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Samyukta Bhardwaj Department of General Surgery, J. J. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Pritesh Joshi Department of General Surgery, J. J. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263346

Keywords:

Total extraperitoneal repair, Inguinal hernia, Learning curve, Laparoscopic surgery, Surgical training, Preperitoneal space, Young surgeon

Abstract

Background: Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernia is a technically demanding laparoscopic procedure with a well-recognized steep learning curve. Limited data exist from teaching institutions in developing countries regarding the progression of surgical competence among young laparoscopic surgeons.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted over two years in the Department of General Surgery at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Twenty-five young laparoscopic surgeons with 1–5 years of laparoscopic experience were enrolled. Data on operative time, intraoperative complications, need for senior assistance, mesh fixation method, and surgeon confidence were collected sequentially for each TEP procedure performed. Surgeons were categorized into early (≤10 cases) and late (>10 cases) learning phases. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact test as appropriate.

Results: The majority of surgeons were aged 30–35 years (44%), with 36% having 1–2 years of laparoscopic experience. Mean operative time decreased significantly from 142±28 minutes in the early phase to 78±18 minutes in the late phase (p<0.001). Requirement for senior assistance decreased from 68% to 22% (p=0.002), and mean confidence score improved from 2.8±0.9 to 4.1±0.7 (p<0.001). A statistically significant association was found between number of TEP procedures performed and operative time reduction (p=0.003). Creation of the space of Bogros (24%) and dissection of Cooper's ligament (16%) were identified as the most time-consuming and assistance-requiring steps.

Conclusions: TEP repair has a clearly defined and significant learning curve. Proficiency is progressively achieved with increasing case volume, with substantial improvement observable beyond 10 cases in this cohort. Structured mentorship, targeted training on critical dissection steps, and adequate case exposure are essential for safe and efficient skill acquisition.

References

Rutkow IM. Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83(5):1045-51.

Grant AM. Open mesh versus non-mesh repair. Br J Surg. 2002;89(4):385-6.

McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM; EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD001785.

Köckerling F, Bittner R, Kuthe A, Hukauf M, Mayer F, Fortelny R, et al. TEP or TAPP for recurrent inguinal hernia repair-register-based comparison of the outcome. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(10):3872-82.

Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S. Laparoscopic surgery and the learning curve. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80(5):1369-84.

Belyansky I, Tsirline VB, Klima DA. Prospective, comparative study of TEP vs TAPP. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):464-71.

Ferzli GS, Edwards ED, Khoury GE. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach to inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1993;3(3):223-9.

McKernan JB, Laws HL. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach. Surg Endosc. 1993;7(1):26-8.

Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Yucel O, Nagan RF. Laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia using a preperitoneal approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992;2(1):53-8.

Wauschkuhn CA, Schwarz J, Boekeler U, Bittner R. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: gold standard in the new millennium? Surg Endosc. 2010;24(12):3021-7.

Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, et al. Training and simulation for patient safety. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):845-57.

Bittner R, Schwarz J. Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012;397(2):271-82.

Stoppa RE. The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg. 1989;13(5):545-54.

Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009;13(4):343–403.

Lal P, Philips P, Saxena KN, Kajla RK, Chander J, Ramteke VK. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair under epidural anesthesia: a detailed evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(4):595-601.

Choi YY, Kim Z, Hur KY. Learning curve for total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012;83(4):226-30.

Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK. Learning curve for total extraperitoneal inguinal herniorrhaphy: implications for training in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(7):1074-7.

HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018;22(1):1-165.

Phillips EH, Arregui M, Carroll BJ, Corbitt J, Crafton WB, Fallas MJ, et al. Incidence of complications following laparoscopic hernioplasty. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(1):16-21.

Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100(3):363-406.