Clinical utility of the clinical abdominal scoring system in predicting the need for laparotomy following blunt abdominal trauma

Ruchi Choudhary; B. K. Arora; H. R. Ranga; Anuradha Mishra; Ruchika Kumari; Kanika Mani

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263840

Authors

Ruchi Choudhary Department of Department of General Surgery, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
B. K. Arora Department of Department of General Surgery, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3650-8415
H. R. Ranga Department of Department of General Surgery, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
Anuradha Mishra Department of Neonatology, ABVIMS and RML Hospital, New Delhi, India
Ruchika Kumari Department of Department of General Surgery, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India
Kanika Mani Department of Department of General Surgery, PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263840

Keywords:

Blunt abdominal trauma, Laparotomy, CASS, Trauma scoring system, Emergency surgery

Abstract

Background: Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in emergency surgical practice. Early identification of patients requiring laparotomy is essential to reduce complications and improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Clinical Abdominal Scoring System (CASS) in predicting the necessity of laparotomy and clinical outcomes in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, from May 2024 to May 2025. A total of 70 patients with blunt abdominal trauma were included. Clinical parameters including pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, abdominal findings, and time of presentation were used to calculate the CASS score. Radiological investigations including eFAST, X-ray abdomen, and contrast-enhanced CT were performed. Patients were managed conservatively or surgically based on clinical findings and scoring.

Results: The mean age of patients was 27.60±13.69 years, with male predominance (82.85%). Road traffic accidents were the most common mechanism of injury (81.42%). Conservative management was successful in 78.57% of patients, whereas 21.42% required surgery. Patients requiring surgical intervention had significantly higher mean CASS scores compared to conservatively managed patients (12.40±0.63 vs. 7.84±1.34, p<0.001). Mortality was significantly associated with higher CASS scores (12.50±0.71 vs. 8.71±2.19, p=0.017).

Conclusion: CASS is a simple, rapid, cost-effective, and reliable bedside scoring system that correlates significantly with operative requirement and clinical outcomes in blunt abdominal trauma patients.

References

van der Vlies CH, Olthof DC, Gaakeer M, et al. Changing patterns in diagnostic strategies and the treatment of blunt injury to solid abdominal organs. Int J Emerg Med. 2011;4:47.

Mehta N, Babu S, Venugopal K. An experience with blunt abdominal trauma: evaluation, management and outcome. Clin Pract. 2014;4(2):599.

Karamercan A, Yilmaz TU, Karamercan MA, Aytac B. Blunt abdominal trauma: evaluation of diagnostic options and surgical outcomes. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2008;14(3):205-10.

Celso B, Tepas J, Langland-Orban B, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma. 2006;60(2):371-8.

van Olden GD, Meeuwis JD, Bolhuis HW, Boxma H, Goris RJA. Advanced trauma life support study: quality of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. J Trauma. 2004;57(2):381-4.

Amuthan J, Vijay A, Pradeep C, Anandan H. A clinical study of blunt injury abdomen in a tertiary care hospital Tamil Nadu. Int J Sci Stud. 2017;5(1):108-12.

El Arini AMH, Abdellatif T, Sallam AM, Ebrahim A. Clinical abdominal scoring system in predicting the necessity of laparotomy in blunt abdominal trauma. Zagazig Univ Med J. 2023;29(1):56-63.

Taylor RB. White coat tales: medicine's heroes, heritage, and misadventures. Cham: Springer; 2016.

Qamar SR, Evans D, Gibney B, Redmond CE, Nasir MU, Wong K, et al. Emergent comprehensive imaging of the major trauma patient: a new paradigm for improved clinical decision-making. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2021;72(2):293-310.

Alam A, Gupta A, Gupta N, Yelamanchi R, Bansal L, Durga C. Ewaluacja skal ISS, RTS, CASS i TRISS w ocenie rokowania u pacjentów po urazie tępym jamy brzusznej. Pol J Surg. 2021;93(2):9-15.

Raghuveer MN, Dinesh HN, Bagdalkar A. CASS—a cost-effective strategy in the management of blunt trauma abdomen. Asian J Med Sci. 2023;14(8):238-43.

Kumar R, Singh V, Gupta A, Shukla VK. Clinical abdominal scoring system for blunt abdominal trauma in rural setup. Int Surg J. 2021;8(7):2089-93.

BATSS in blunt trauma abdomen. MedPulse Int J Surg. 2019;19(2):77-81.