Comparative evaluation of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm renal calculi: a retrospective comparative study

Apoorv Shastri; Pranjal Mohar Jaal

doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263342

Authors

Apoorv Shastri Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, JNU Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Pranjal Mohar Jaal Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, JNU Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20263342

Keywords:

RIRS, PCNL, Renal calculi, Stone-free rate, Urolithiasis

Abstract

Background: Renal calculi measuring 1-2 cm presents a therapeutic dilemma between retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The present study aimed to compare clinical outcomes, complications and stone clearance rates between these two modalities.

Methods: This retrospective comparative study was conducted in the Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, JNU Medical College, Jaipur, from January 2025 to January 2026. A total of 250 patients were included, of whom 80 underwent RIRS and 170 underwent PCNL. Demographic variables, stone characteristics, operative outcomes and postoperative complications were analysed.

Results: The stone-free rate was 95.0% in the RIRS group and 98.2% in the PCNL group. Mean operative time was 1.8 hours in the RIRS group compared to 1.3 hours in the PCNL group. Bleeding complications were more common in the PCNL group (28.8%) whereas fever and sepsis were more frequent following RIRS. Hospital stay was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: Both RIRS and PCNL are effective treatment options for intermediate-sized renal calculi. RIRS offers a minimally invasive alternative, whereas PCNL provides superior stone clearance in selected patients.

Author Biography

Apoorv Shastri, Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, JNU Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Department Of General Surgery, Senior Resident

References

Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2023;84(3):345-56.

Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1190-6.

Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, Ugurlu M, Tekinarslan E, Aslan R, et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and PCNL in moderate-sized kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis. J Endourol. 2012;26(5):508-13.

De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Zargar H, Laydner H, Balsamo R, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):125-37.

Zhang W, Zhou T, Li J, Wang X, Liu Y. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower pole renal stones 1.5–2.5 cm: a prospective randomized study. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(6):563-70.

Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(4):899-906.

Tokas T, Skolarikos A, Herrmann TR, Nagele U. Pressure matters: intrarenal pressure during retrograde intrarenal surgery. World J Urol. 2019;37(12):2633-9.

Skolarikos A, Papatsoris AG. Diagnosis and management of postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy complications. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1757-62.

Resorlu B, Unsal A, Ziypak T, Diri A, Atmaca AF, Oztuna D, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15–20 mm. J Endourol. 2012;26(9):1161-5.

Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, Desai M. Treating renal calculi 1–2 cm in diameter with mini-percutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective randomized study. BJU Int. 2012;110(8):E346-9.

Karakoyunlu N, Goktug HN, Sener NC, Karakoyunlu AN, Nalbant I, Imamoglu MA. Comparison of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower caliceal stones smaller than 2 cm. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(3):283-7.

Giusti G, Proietti S, Villa L, Cloutier J, Rosso M, Gadda GM, et al. Current standard technique for modern flexible ureteroscopy: tips and tricks. Eur Urol Focus. 2016;1(1):27-41.

Tokas T, Skolarikos A, Herrmann TR, Nagele U. Pressure matters: intrarenal pressure during retrograde intrarenal surgery. World J Urol. 2019;37(12):2633-9.

Zeng G, Zhu W, Lam W, Cooperberg MR, Scoffone HM, Zhang X, et al. Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2016;30(1):18-24.

Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(4):899-906.